LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2015, 04:48 PM   #1
Gregg Bell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,034

Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
I'm xfce and have the choice between kde, gnome and root. Which is the best choice?


I'm running Xubuntu 15.04 and I've been looking at backups in the Ubuntu Software Center. There's one backup called backintime and there's three choices (see screenshot) and none are xfce. Which is the best choice?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Selection_001.png
Views:	68
Size:	15.7 KB
ID:	18518  
 
Old 05-19-2015, 05:31 PM   #2
Philip Lacroix
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 441

Rep: Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574Reputation: 574
Backintime is a front end to rsync, diff and cp (see the man pages of these commands to have an idea of what they do). According to the project's website, three versions (interfaces) are available, exactly as you can see on the list provided by your package manager: KDE (which will need some dependencies from the KDE desktop environment), GNOME (which will need some dependencies from GNOME) and a command-line version (no GUI) if I get it right. There's only one source tarball on the official web site, hence I guess that Xubuntu's packagers decided to create one different version for each interface. Anyway, you can run either one on Xfce: the difference will be in which dependencies are going to be pulled in by Xubuntu's package manager. Which one is "best" will depend on your tastes: the difference will be cosmetic. The GNOME version will be probably more consistent with Xfce than the KDE version, which is based on the Qt library. Before installing you might want to look at which packages are pulled in by the PM when you select one of the versions.

Here's the website, which includes documentation:

Back In Time: a simple backup tool for Linux

Last edited by Philip Lacroix; 05-19-2015 at 06:54 PM. Reason: clarification; brackets
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-20-2015, 12:25 AM   #3
Gregg Bell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,034

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Lacroix View Post
Backintime is a front end to rsync, diff and cp (see the man pages of these commands to have an idea of what they do). According to the project's website, three versions (interfaces) are available, exactly as you can see on the list provided by your package manager: KDE (which will need some dependencies from the KDE desktop environment), GNOME (which will need some dependencies from GNOME) and a command-line version (no GUI) if I get it right. There's only one source tarball on the official web site, hence I guess that Xubuntu's packagers decided to create one different version for each interface. Anyway, you can run either one on Xfce: the difference will be in which dependencies are going to be pulled in by Xubuntu's package manager. Which one is "best" will depend on your tastes: the difference will be cosmetic. The GNOME version will be probably more consistent with Xfce than the KDE version, which is based on the Qt library. Before installing you might want to look at which packages are pulled in by the PM when you select one of the versions.

Here's the website, which includes documentation:

Back In Time: a simple backup tool for Linux
Thanks so much, Phillip. I think I'll just go with the GUI that looks more appealing then. Appreciate it.
 
Old 05-20-2015, 07:04 PM   #4
S0M30N3
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Bell View Post
Which is the best choice?
None of those

With Version 1.1.0 I moved from two GUIs for KDE and Gnome based Desktop to only one GUI using QT4 (backintime-qt4) which will run on all Desktops. I'd suppose to use the current version (1.1.4 at time of writing) from our stable repository

Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install backintime-qt4
Regards,
Germar, BIT Dev-Team
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-20-2015, 10:53 PM   #5
Gregg Bell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,034

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by S0M30N3 View Post
None of those

With Version 1.1.0 I moved from two GUIs for KDE and Gnome based Desktop to only one GUI using QT4 (backintime-qt4) which will run on all Desktops. I'd suppose to use the current version (1.1.4 at time of writing) from our stable repository

Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install backintime-qt4
Regards,
Germar, BIT Dev-Team
Thanks. I couldn't find it either in Linux Mint 17.1's software center or its Synaptic.
 
Old 05-27-2015, 12:57 AM   #6
Gregg Bell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,034

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by S0M30N3 View Post
None of those

With Version 1.1.0 I moved from two GUIs for KDE and Gnome based Desktop to only one GUI using QT4 (backintime-qt4) which will run on all Desktops. I'd suppose to use the current version (1.1.4 at time of writing) from our stable repository

Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bit-team/stable
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install backintime-qt4
Regards,
Germar, BIT Dev-Team
Hey, backintime is really awesome! Thank you!
 
Old 05-27-2015, 08:07 AM   #7
Habitual
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Abingdon, VA
Distribution: Catalina
Posts: 9,374
Blog Entries: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
for the next poor ol' sod...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Bell View Post
Thanks. I couldn't find it either in Linux Mint 17.1's software center or its Synaptic.
open a terminal and issue:
Code:
mintsources
Click on PPAs and add this string "ppa:bit-team/stable" w\out quotes. Hit the OK Button. Then :Update the cache" button. Exit.
Run synaptic and search for backintime.

I received this dialog:
Code:
ppa:bit-team/stable

This repository contains stable releases for Back In Time.

https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/ubuntu/stable
See https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/ubuntu/stable for additional details.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-27-2015, 02:24 PM   #8
Gregg Bell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,034

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habitual View Post
for the next poor ol' sod...


open a terminal and issue:
Code:
mintsources
Click on PPAs and add this string "ppa:bit-team/stable" w\out quotes. Hit the OK Button. Then :Update the cache" button. Exit.
Run synaptic and search for backintime.

I received this dialog:
Code:
ppa:bit-team/stable

This repository contains stable releases for Back In Time.

https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/ubuntu/stable


See https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/ubuntu/stable for additional details.
A question from the current ol' sod: any advantage to doing it your way? I've got to install backintime on two more computers. Doing it with SOM30N3's commands worked great.

Last edited by Gregg Bell; 05-27-2015 at 02:25 PM.
 
Old 05-31-2015, 07:39 AM   #9
S0M30N3
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregg Bell View Post
A question from the current ol' sod: any advantage to doing it your way?
There is no difference between both ways. Except Habitual's way provides some fancy buttons to click on ;D
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-31-2015, 01:37 PM   #10
Gregg Bell
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2014
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 2,034

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by S0M30N3 View Post
There is no difference between both ways. Except Habitual's way provides some fancy buttons to click on ;D
oooo! Fancy buttons! (How could I resist those!) Thanks for responding.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KDE - Gnome choice in SUSE10 jknedlik SUSE / openSUSE 1 11-21-2005 11:29 AM
KDE, Gnome Choice BooDa72 Linux - Newbie 6 03-04-2005 12:11 PM
Gnome/KDE choice for Palm-sync nielchiano Linux - Software 2 02-16-2004 11:43 PM
Gnome/KDE choice Andy@DP Linux - Newbie 3 08-16-2003 01:49 PM
KDE or Gnome Choice at Login bongski55 Slackware 13 08-15-2003 10:18 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration