Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
09-23-2006, 02:25 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 111
Rep:
|
Noob install and partition question
I searched for this but no hit answered my questions. I have a secondary hard drive to install Ubuntu (my primary is my main XP install). The drive is a 250 Gb drive, and I've partitioned 20 Gb for Ubuntu. The remaining ~230 Gb is filespace for my Windows drive.
I started the live CD and then clicked on install. When it got to the partitioning, I was presented with 3 options:
1. Wipe the 250 Gb drive and install Ubuntu (No!)
2. Install onto the largest free space
3. Manually partition.
I have more than 20 Gb free on the 230 Gb partition, so I wasn't sure if option 2 would automatically find the unconfigured 20 Gb partition or would it install onto the ~ 50 Gb free space on the 230 Gb partition.
When I chose option 3, it told me to allocate minimum 2Gb for / and minimum 256 Mb for swap. I did that, and that left ~ 18 Gb for the install. But there was no way to choose that - after selecting the 2 Gb partition for / and the ~ 512 Mb partition I created for swap, I was asked to select the remaining space for either /home, /var, /boot, etc. How many partitions do I need to create?? I figured I'd just want it to automatically decide for the remaining.
Or would it option 2 ignore the 230 Gb partition even though it has more than 20 Gb of space?
On another note, anyone know why the installer did not correctly pick up the system time from BIOS? Even though I had the time zone correctly, it was showing 5 hours behind.
|
|
|
09-23-2006, 02:36 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Seymour, Indiana
Distribution: Distribution: RHEL 5 with Pieces of this and that.
Kernel 2.6.23.1, KDE 3.5.8 and KDE 4.0 beta, Plu
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
This is confusing. I essence everything works from / so if you create no othr partitions then say for /home will be part of / partition. If you create a /home partition then it is seperate.. Most files will be in /usr so I would say if you left / as 2 gig you will run out of romm quickly. If it was me I would do it like this.
/ =2gig
/home = 2 gig
/usr = 8gig
/boot = 100mb
/var = 2gig
swap can be anything you wish. With 512meg of ram I doubt you will get into much. 256meg would be suffeniecent.
I would use remaining space as fat32 if you have none now. Then you can swap between both OSes easy any data.
Brian1
|
|
|
09-23-2006, 04:35 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,390
|
Let it install into the free space - it comes up with what I consider some wacky sizes, but let it go. It will use the unallocated space, not free space in that Windoze partition.
The (probable) reason you got into strife was only allocating the minimum 2 Gig for the root. If you want to manually configure, give it say 10 Gig (for the root), some swap, and a separate /home (a good option BTW). Should be sufficient.
The (extra) fat32 partition suggestion above is also a good one for exchanging data between the two operating environments - both will have native read/write support. Not necessary, but handy.
|
|
|
09-23-2006, 04:47 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Lubbock, Tx.
Distribution: Ubuntu Dapper Drake
Posts: 184
Rep:
|
another reccomendation is make your swap twice your physical memory.
|
|
|
09-23-2006, 09:03 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 111
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Perfect - thanks for the answers all! I'll try installing again.
Does anyone know why the install screwed up the system time?
Last edited by NickC; 09-23-2006 at 10:10 PM.
|
|
|
09-24-2006, 01:13 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,390
|
Probably the default UTC offset doesn't agree with your location.
Never noticed, wouldn't care. You set your own location when you do the install.
|
|
|
09-24-2006, 11:48 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 111
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I let it install on the free space and it seems to have worked!  I also edited the menu.lst file so that I can dual boot.
Regarding the time, I found another thread where you edit a file to say UTC=no. Before this, even after the install it kept screwing up the system time, and the next time I booted into Windows the time would be a few hours off (even though both were set to Pacific US timezone). I'll see now if that fixed it.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|