Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-16-2007, 08:45 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 46
Rep:
|
long fsck.fat on bootup
I installed ubuntu 6.06.1 on my desktop machine that has two drives and partitions for dual booting Windows ME and Debian. When I first booted via grub into Ubuntu, I got a message that there was a difference between the original and backup on /dev/hda1 (the Windows ME partition).
Based on a recommendation here, I did a fsck.fat -arv /dev/hda1. This asked me what to do and I chose to copy the original to the backup. That seemed to difference error on bootup. Now what I am facing is a tremendously long wait while the bootup script does a fsck.fat on the /dev/hda1. Eventually, it boots into Ubuntu.
Why is it doing this fsck? Can I modify the boot script to avoid it?
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 07:07 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I solved the problem (or at least made it go away). I commented out in /etc/fstab the line that triggered the mounting of /dev/hda1. It boots straight through now.
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 08:03 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2005
Posts: 1,565
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by datasink
I solved the problem (or at least made it go away). I commented out in /etc/fstab the line that triggered the mounting of /dev/hda1. It boots straight through now.
|
Yeah you can just mount it manually by typing:
sudo mount -t <filesystemformat, i.e. ext3> /dev/hda1 /mountpoint
Maybe make an icon on your desktop or something.
|
|
|
01-18-2007, 08:36 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,647
Rep: 
|
The numbers in the last two columns in /etc/fstab decide which partitions are checked an in what order Just change them to 0 0 and your fat partition is never checked again but can be mounted automatically.
|
|
|
01-18-2007, 03:07 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JZL240I-U
The numbers in the last two columns in /etc/fstab decide which partitions are checked an in what order Just change them to 0 0 and your fat partition is never checked again but can be mounted automatically.
|
I didn't know that about the 0 0. I'll try it.
Thanks
|
|
|
01-20-2007, 02:33 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
|
Side question: Why are you using Windows ME? LOL I can understand Windows 98 or Windows 2000, but ME was the worst!
|
|
|
01-20-2007, 07:57 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 46
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Windows ME was the operating system that my machine came with and I was too cheap to upgrade. So I switched to Linux...the Windows partition is just sitting there dormant with data files that I access occasionally.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|