Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.


  Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2005, 10:00 PM   #1
Rory in Toronto
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 136

Rep: Reputation: 15
loading Ubuntu on a separate drive


About to load Kubuntu on a separate drive from SuSE 9.2. When I've done this in the past, I've run in to problems with the OS going on to the desired drive but the bootloader overwriting the bootloader of the other OS on the other drive. With SuSE and Fedora, on install there are settings that let you confirm where the bootloader will go.

Does Ubuntu allow you to confirm where the bootloader will go during the install? I want to keep the OS's and bootloaders completely separate, only switching between them but flipping the drive that will boot in the bios.

I've looked at the OSDir screenshots of Ubuntu, but that didn't help me.

Anyone know?

Old 04-09-2005, 12:56 AM   #2
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.6.4 "Snow Leopard", Win 7, Ubuntu 10.04
Posts: 322

Rep: Reputation: 31
It's been awhile since I installed Ubuntu, but I am pretty sure you can. You can manually type in where you want it to write the BL to, just like in debian install.
Old 04-09-2005, 08:20 AM   #3
Rory in Toronto
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Hmm... manual type destination of bootloader.

Can anyone confirm?
Old 04-10-2005, 03:53 AM   #4
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Dual booting Mandrake 10 and SUSE 9.1
Posts: 44

Rep: Reputation: 15
If you disconect the drive with SUSE9.2 on it and connect the other drive and load Ubuntu on that and then have both drives connected will that get you what you want?
Old 04-10-2005, 07:41 AM   #5
Rory in Toronto
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Yes, disconnecting drives is the cleanest method for this, as it ensures the bootloader can't get thrown on the other drive.

In my case, it worked out. I had SuSE 9.2 and the bootloader on my hdb drive. So, I was loading Ubuntu on the hda drive. It automatically wants to put the bootloader on the MBR of hda. So, it was fine to let it do that. Ubuntu also recognized I had SuSE 9.2 and added it to the hda bootloader, as well, which is handy.

I can confirm there was an option to reject putting the bootloader on the mbr of hda. But, I did not select 'no' so I didn't see options beyond that.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wierd Messages while loading Ubuntu crash_override_me Ubuntu 2 09-06-2005 07:23 AM
Separate Partitions for Separate User groups volvic Slackware - Installation 2 09-16-2004 02:42 AM
just installed Gentoo on separate hard drive, dual boot question Gates1026 Linux - Newbie 10 05-04-2004 03:11 AM
Booting from a Separate Hard Drive sneakers Linux - Laptop and Netbook 7 10-29-2003 12:13 PM
Installing linux on a separate hard-drive Hawkboy Linux - Newbie 4 08-16-2002 12:04 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration