LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-29-2008, 04:29 PM   #1
eoinrua
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Lurgan, Northern Ireland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Puppy
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 15
How low can Xubuntu go?


Quick question on using Xubuntu for a (very) old machine.

I'm trying to revitalise my daughter's laptop which, at the moment, is running Windows 98. I gave it to her when I upgraded my own. It's an ancient Compaq Notebook 100 series, with a 475MHz AMD processor, 5Gb hard drive and 64Mb RAM.

If I used the alternate CD, would I be able to install Xubuntu on it? I already use Xubuntu on one of my older boxes, but it's neither processor nor memory-challenged in the same way as the laptop.

I know I could easily use DSL, but it'd be a bit grim for my daughter, as she likes bright colours, cheerful point-and-click icons and so on. And Puppy - much as I love it myself for rescuing old hardware - is not as intuitive as she'd need.

And then, assuming I can install it on the box, would I be able to run some of the "cutesy-ier" games like Tuxcart and Supertux? I'm afraid Sokoban and Mahjong just wouldn't cut it for her.

She's great with ubuntu, because that's what we all use in my house, so Xubuntu wouldn't mean any shocks.

Would Xubuntu do the job? If not, are there any alternatives (preferably ubuntu-based) that could?

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Last edited by eoinrua; 02-29-2008 at 04:30 PM. Reason: additional information
 
Old 02-29-2008, 05:37 PM   #2
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Xubuntu will run with 64MB of RAM but at least 128 is recommended. Maybe FluxBuntu suits you better?
 
Old 02-29-2008, 05:49 PM   #3
eoinrua
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Lurgan, Northern Ireland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Puppy
Posts: 121

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks Jay, I've heard of Fluxbuntu, but I've never tried it. I'll check it out.

How would it be with games like supertux etc?
 
Old 03-01-2008, 08:59 AM   #4
IndyGunFreak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indpls
Distribution: Laptops: Debian Jessie XFCE, NAS: OpenMediaVault 3.0
Posts: 1,355

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by eoinrua View Post
Thanks Jay, I've heard of Fluxbuntu, but I've never tried it. I'll check it out.

How would it be with games like supertux etc?
Flux, or that system? I imagine Flux will run games as well as any other GUI. That system? Eh, I wouldn't put much hope into it running much of anything.

Unfortunately Flux isn't very intuitive either, as its very bare-bones, but it will run on almost anything.

IGF
 
Old 03-05-2008, 04:15 PM   #5
eoinrua
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Lurgan, Northern Ireland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Puppy
Posts: 121

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Fraid you're right IndyGunFreak. I've given up hope on trying to do anything constructive with the system.

Xubuntu's out of the question for when I actually started working on the machine I realised that it had less memory than I thought. Fluxbuntu seems a bit dodgy and even Puppy Linux is struggling to run.

I guess some machines are so outdated as to be irredeemable by any OS.

Thanks anyway.
 
Old 12-09-2008, 09:31 PM   #6
eoinrua
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Lurgan, Northern Ireland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Puppy
Posts: 121

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Just upgraded machine to 156Mb. Xubuntu still won't run but seems to make all the right moves at the start.

Would the "Alternate CD" help?
 
Old 12-09-2008, 10:44 PM   #7
siliconpie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 44

Rep: Reputation: 15
I've tried. 64MB is too low =\
 
Old 12-09-2008, 10:59 PM   #8
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Quote:
Would the "Alternate CD" help?
The alternate CD requires fewer resources to install but in the end it is the same system so if that is your problem - it installs but it runs way too slow - I do not think that it will make any real difference in the end.

Maybe you should get the server edition, which installs as 100% command line based system. This should install and run just fine. Once you have it up and running, you can add on graphical applications. But obviously, this means you will have to be very picky about what to install.
 
Old 12-10-2008, 05:04 AM   #9
IndyGunFreak
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indpls
Distribution: Laptops: Debian Jessie XFCE, NAS: OpenMediaVault 3.0
Posts: 1,355

Rep: Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by eoinrua View Post
Just upgraded machine to 156Mb. Xubuntu still won't run but seems to make all the right moves at the start.

Would the "Alternate CD" help?
What jay said.

If its slow running from the CD, crashing during install, etc, then the Alt. install cd might help. If however, you're actually getting installed, and its slow.. then its still gonna be slow.

One would think Puppy would fly with 156mb of RAM, but I have little experience with Puppy.

IGF
 
Old 12-10-2008, 07:49 PM   #10
siliconpie
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 44

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyGunFreak View Post
What jay said.

If its slow running from the CD, crashing during install, etc, then the Alt. install cd might help. If however, you're actually getting installed, and its slow.. then its still gonna be slow.

One would think Puppy would fly with 156mb of RAM, but I have little experience with Puppy.

IGF
Puppy is good, but if you want Debian, go for Damn Small Linux. Puppy is in my opinion, better, but I'm a Debian guy, so it's DSL all the way.
 
Old 12-12-2008, 07:19 PM   #11
shane25119
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Illinois
Distribution: Linux Mint XFCE
Posts: 654

Rep: Reputation: 53
I recomend using E-Live, which is a live CD but can be installed to the hard drive- it uses the Enlightenment window manager (version 17) which looks absolutely amazing with a very small memory footprint.

If you want to keep something approaching the Synaptic manager- use Vector- which IIRC is geared toward the older hardware.
 
Old 12-14-2008, 01:34 AM   #12
eoinrua
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Lurgan, Northern Ireland
Distribution: Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Puppy
Posts: 121

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks guys,

I will try out your suggestions - when I can get my hands on my daughter's machine again.

She loves experimenting...but only when it's her who's doing the experimenting.

I'm so pleased she's a Linux child, though. "Make the doggy come on" means she wants Puppy.

Thanks again but Ill be back to the thread when I've sussed out some of your suggestions.
 
Old 12-14-2008, 07:23 AM   #13
Hern_28
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: North Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 12.0, Gentoo, LFS, Debian, Kubuntu.
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 38
Middle Ground.

Think Debian custom built from the net-inst cd might be worth a try. Slackware runs ok on my AMD K6-2 400mhz with 196 Megs Ram.
 
Old 12-25-2008, 10:49 PM   #14
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
puppy linux 4.11 retro will do fine brought my computer back to life 64 mb 400 mhz. used to run mandrake 8.1 on it but things got to advanced now days. I did a frugal install on mine so I could just make a back up by coppying a file. it is fast and stable great gui. if you have problems with 4.11 then go to the 2.16. i used that for a long time.
 
  


Reply

Tags
lightweightdistros, ubuntu, xubuntu


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xubuntu 6 or 7 for old pc dinow Ubuntu 1 11-08-2007 03:12 PM
Xubuntu phantom_cyph Linux - Distributions 3 04-20-2007 01:58 AM
towards xubuntu 6.10?? pjo Ubuntu 3 11-11-2006 05:13 AM
Xubuntu brianthegreat Ubuntu 4 06-04-2006 10:49 PM
LXer: NCS Introduces Ultra-Compact, Low-Cost, Low-Power and Super-Quiet Set-top Server Appliance Platforms LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-29-2006 08:01 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration