UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Rep:
Firefox installation error
I downloaded Mozilla Firefox 1.0.6 from mozilla.org. I extracted it using
tar -xf filename.tar
I then went into the firefox-installer directory and typed:
./firefox-install and I got this error:
/firefox-installer-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Now what do I do? This is in my /home directory. I even tried as root and I got the same error.
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Original Poster
Rep:
I heard there is this thing in Debian called Apt-get. Could I just apt-get mozilla firefox 1.0.6 in Kubuntu? But I do have my reservations about apt-get doing everything for me automatically.
Originally posted by Micro420
I heard there is this thing in Debian called Apt-get. Could I just apt-get mozilla firefox 1.0.6 in Kubuntu?
Yeah, just sudo apt-get update and sudo apt-get install mozilla-firefox
Quote:
But I do have my reservations about apt-get doing everything for me automatically.
What are your reservations?
You know, you can just install Firefox graphically (no terminal) from the .tar.gz from Mozilla. Just follow this tutorial (it's a little different for Kubuntu, but the same principle applies):
Oh, and if you do use apt-get to install Firefox, you can use this script to take back the normal Firefox icon. Just don't answer "yes" to the refresh Gnome panel if you're using Kubuntu. And instead of gedit, use kwrite.
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by aysiu Yeah, just sudo apt-get update and sudo apt-get install mozilla-firefox
What are your reservations?
You know, you can just install Firefox graphically (no terminal) from the .tar.gz from Mozilla. Just follow this tutorial (it's a little different for Kubuntu, but the same principle applies):
Oh, and if you do use apt-get to install Firefox, you can use this script to take back the normal Firefox icon. Just don't answer "yes" to the refresh Gnome panel if you're using Kubuntu. And instead of gedit, use kwrite.
Thanks for the graphical images.... too bad I can't get to them because that's the same thing as what I did. it's supposed to give me the graphical installer but I get that problem I stated earlier. I had no problems doing this in Mandriva, though. I thought this was weird that I could not do it in Kubuntu.
About my reservations, it's because I was used to Mandriva URPMI system and it auto installed software and packages just like apt-get. The onlly problem was that URPMI never told you where it installed it to and you never knew what kind of configurations it gave you. Plus you'd run into conflicts with packages and it could be a nightmare. I don't want the same thing with apt-get.
Distribution: Mac OS X Leopard 10.6.2, Windows 2003 Server/Vista/7/XP/2000/NT/98, Ubuntux64, CentOS4.8/5.4
Posts: 2,986
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by snarkout Sounds like you might be better off using slackware then.
I checked out the official Slackware website and it's pretty plain. No screenshots or graphics on the website. Seems very plain and it kind of turns me off. Is Slackware easy to use?
No, not particularly, but you mentioned an aversion to using package managemant. I figured this meant you'd rather compile your own packages, and that's more or less the slack way. Slack is very sweet if you are into doing most things yourself - very fast, thin, and has some pretty good documentation.
Maybe Gentoo might be more your cup of tea.
I've heard it's really easy, fully customizable and doesn't hide anything from you, but you have to follow the instructions very closely.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.