Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I heard about the new .WWF format this morning. It is an initiative of the World Wildlife Fund to prevent people printing .PDF files. As a matter of fact, it is a .PDF format, but slightly modified and with the "no printing" flag enabled. But I don't like it when people are forbidding me something. It is sending the wrong message. So I set out to crack it.
Good job, but it's not really a hack, I mean it's just 'click to print' or 'export to ps/pdf'. These are features that are already implemented.
It is quite stupid to make a format that will not print. If I want to print it, I will print it. Heck I could even take a screenshot and print that if I wanted to.
EDIT: Just for that WWF, I'm printing another printer test page ... screw you and all the BS reasons you make up and say you're saving the planet !
Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 12-04-2010 at 10:50 AM.
I don't see why you can't have a PDF reader that can simply ignore any kind of security features in the first place. The way I see it, if it is on MY computer, I should be able to open it, modify it, bork it if I want, print it, etc.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.