LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Syndicated Linux News (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/syndicated-linux-news-67/)
-   -   LXer: Windows 7's virtual 'XP mode' could mean support nightmares (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/syndicated-linux-news-67/lxer-windows-7s-virtual-xp-mode-could-mean-support-nightmares-722157/)

LXer 04-28-2009 01:30 AM

LXer: Windows 7's virtual 'XP mode' could mean support nightmares
 
Published at LXer:

Michael Silver, an analyst at Gartner Inc., echoed Cherry's take on what motivated Microsoft to offer XPM. "It shows the extent to [which] Microsoft wants to get people who use XP onto Windows 7," he said.

But Silver sees some big downsides. "You'll have to support two versions of Windows," he said. "Each needs to be secured, antivirused, firewalled and patched. Businesses don't want to support two instances of Windows on each machine. If a company has 10,000 PCs, that's 20,000 instances of Windows."

The other big problem Silver foresees with XPM is that it may cause some companies to neglect the real task: making sure the software they run is compatible with Windows 7. "This is a great Band-Aid, but companies need to heal their applications," Silver said. "They'll be doing themselves a disservice if, because of XPM, they're not making sure that all their apps support Windows 7."

Read More...

rkelsen 04-28-2009 05:17 AM

Ya gotta love Microsoft, don'cha? :D

This is probably a smart business move, but geez what a ridiculous situation!

Does this mean that Windows XP won't be EOLed for eternity??

Hangdog42 04-28-2009 05:25 AM

To be honest, Microsoft needs to take a page from the Apple playbook and simply develop a new OS that doesn't have backward compatibility. Apple has done this several times, the latest being OS X, when the cost of maintaining backward compatibility was simply getting in the way.

rkelsen 04-28-2009 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hangdog42 (Post 3523361)
To be honest, Microsoft needs to take a page from the Apple playbook and simply develop a new OS that doesn't have backward compatibility.

They tried that with Vista. My understanding was that it was a complete re-write from the ground up.

Hangdog42 04-28-2009 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkelsen (Post 3523380)
They tried that with Vista. My understanding was that it was a complete re-write from the ground up.

Good point. Let me try to rephrase my previous statement:

To be honest, Microsoft needs to take a page from the Apple playbook and simply develop a new OS that doesn't have backward compatibility and actually does something useful. Apple has done this several times, the latest being OS X, when the cost of maintaining backward compatibility was simply getting in the way.

H_TeXMeX_H 04-28-2009 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkelsen (Post 3523380)
They tried that with Vista. My understanding was that it was a complete re-write from the ground up.

Impossible, all window$ versions (including Vi$ta) will fit on a single compressed DVD, this means they all have plenty in common.

rkelsen 04-28-2009 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H (Post 3523796)
Impossible, all window$ versions (including Vi$ta) will fit on a single compressed DVD, this means they all have plenty in common.

And you know this how??

Yarr harr... ;)

H_TeXMeX_H 04-29-2009 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkelsen (Post 3524146)
And you know this how??

Yarr harr... ;)

Well, no, I don't actually have that DVD ... someone told me about it :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.