LXer: User Familiarity != Software Superiority
Published at LXer:
Many FOSS projects are on-par with their closed source counter parts when it comes to the number of features and functionality. Why is it then that FOS softwares are less commonly used by the general public? Simple: User Familiarity Read More... |
Completely agreed with this article. The whole point of Linux is change, which people are phobic of on the computer, thinking that "change" really means "hacking" when it doesn't. They have absolutely no idea that there are other things to browse the Web besides the big 'E' and there are other things to perform office work besides the big 'W' or big 'X'. If there was no change, how could we possibly have gotten into this economic me$$? It's the same thing with Linux: U$er$ are the real idiots, not Microsoft necessarily. That's why we need users educated about Linux.
Which brings me right back to Windows 7 Sin #1. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Anyway, here's my vision of the future of FOSS:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...neration-3115/ |
Despite the "user familiarity" argument, Google is working to change people's opinions about FOSS if you consider Chrome OS being out there.
The reason why I'm so excited about Google's entrance into the OS market is that Google is trying to bring FOSS to the masses, which is why they released Android and then Chrome OS. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Google:
Get the picture? |
Quote:
You mustn't be blind to the reasons why Google does all those positive actions. Definitely not to promote FOSS for the sake of it or because they believe in the ideology. That's probably at the bottom of their priority list. Their reasons are less noble than you'd think. As any company they want to grab a bigger and bigger market share, bring more profits, etc. If/when they reach the position that MS had a few years back, they are quite likely to start playing dirty to eradicate any competitors. They don't charge money, their currency is your privacy (which can then be turned into money as you can see from their annual income) |
I am a big fan of linux and FOSS/FSF
But, I think Google Chrome is not going to be much accepted by the majority of linux users. I've seen many polls on Google Chrome OS and the results were always negative. If Google wants to win these people over, they have to do alot of work or do something remarkable for the linux community. |
Quote:
The average user doesn't care, if it is FOSS or proprietary stuff, as long as it is cheap. |
And free is cheap, isn't it?
|
Of course, but they see the free as in beer, they don't care about the free as in speech. They would also use any proprietary system, as long as it is free or cheap. Like they use the Windows that comes "for free" (in their mind) with the new computer or the Internet.
By the way, how free or cheap is a system that costs your privacy? |
Quote:
About the "free" that's in users' minds: Haven't they already seen the Windows upgrade disks in the store and seen how much they cost? Haven't they seen the full Windows licenses and seen how much more they cost? That should be enough to get the fact that Windows is proprietary, expensive, privacy-compromising, and freedom-compromising through their thick skulls. |
Quote:
Yet, for some strange reason, MS is the ultimate evil for you, whereas Google, according to you, is a perfect example of a noble organisation. Doesn't that make you think about it just a little bit? |
Quote:
It is as simple as this: Microsoft writes proprietary Software. Does that make them evil? I don't think so. Where they become evil is their business practices. Google writes FOSS. Does this make them good, regardless of their business practices? I also don't think so. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM. |