Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
02-11-2012, 05:32 AM
|
#1
|
LXer NewsBot
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 135,089
Rep: 
|
LXer: Ubuntu Means Business: Announces Business Desktop Remix
Published at LXer:
Ubuntu is making inroads into the enterprise segments in various markets. Recently The Supreme Court of India ordered all courts across India to switch to Ubuntu. Prior to this move the courts across India were using the Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which is mainly targeted at servers. More than 17,000 courts around India will now be switching over to Ubuntu from RHEL.
Read More...
|
|
|
02-11-2012, 06:17 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753
|
Thats lame.
Moving from a public company (RHEL) to a private company based in a tax haven (ubuntu/canonical), that is something I cannot understand, or support.
Quote:
Mark clears such doubts, "No secret sauce for customers only; we're not creating a RHEL, we already have an enterprise-quality release cadence called LTS and we like it just the way it is."
|
Not that RHEL has 'secrect sauce' (or 'secret souce', the wording is either a pun or more likely a way to dirty REHLs name without actually legally saying what they are impling).
If we all ran on the sauce/source that canonical provides, linux in general would be years behind where we are thanks to RHEL. How much does canonical contribute back to linux? Sod-all compared to RHEL.
|
|
|
02-11-2012, 06:29 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
|
Slowly but surely Ubuntu's original mantra is being pushed aside. A company who once said there will be no enterprise edition suddenly has one, a company who started preaching, and still does preach, open source is actually going in the opposite direction of its stated philosophy (both past and present).
I remember back in the 9.10 development days a group of extremely dedicated users (just me actually lol) at Ubuntu Forums suggested a "business edition" and we were howled down and told it would never happen because everyone wants games etc and if you didn't want games or wanted more business software them all you had to do was apt-get remove and apt-get install. Nearly 3 years later it seems Mr Shuttleworth is starting to have "original ideas". Don't go thinking it wasn't suggested earlier either I just can't find the older threads.
Well done Mark.
Last edited by k3lt01; 02-11-2012 at 07:11 AM.
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 02:51 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01
Slowly but surely Ubuntu's original mantra is being pushed aside. A company who once said there will be no enterprise edition suddenly has one, a company who started preaching, and still does preach, open source is actually going in the opposite direction of its stated philosophy (both past and present).
|
You didnt really believe the hype, did you? Ubuntu was always a canonical vehicle. Canonical has always been about profit.
As for the suggestion of a business edition, I'm not that suprised. IIRC at least one other person at the foums thought it was a good idea, I'm sure I've seen someone that wasnt you suggesting the same thing. I'm not even going to try to find it, the ubuntu forums tend to bury/lock inconvenient posts, threads and ideas.
The whole ubutnu ecosystem is broken IMO. Shuttleworth goes on about meritocracy, that IMO its used a way to ignore the 'community' and deflection of potentially good ideas.
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 03:12 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
You didnt really believe the hype, did you? Ubuntu was always a canonical vehicle. Canonical has always been about profit.
|
I believed it for about 6 months. The only things that kept me with Ubuntu was the fact I was so green and Ubuntu was very easy to learn, was being the operative word. How many businesses after 8 years of running at a loss are still worth keeping? Kubuntu has been dropped after 7 years. Why is Canonical which has never made a profit yet still operating? Mark has money, good on him I acknowledge self made people, but I doubt Canonical would still be able to operate if it wasn't for the fact he planted it on the Isle of Man.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
As for the suggestion of a business edition, I'm not that suprised. IIRC at least one other person at the foums thought it was a good idea, I'm sure I've seen someone that wasnt you suggesting the same thing. I'm not even going to try to find it, the ubuntu forums tend to bury/lock inconvenient posts, threads and ideas.
|
Yes there were a group of us who suggested it back when 8.04 was being developed, BUT, as you have said, inconvenient topics/threads cannot be found and I can't find them in my own thread list  . To be fair they did say they were going to "archive" old material.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
The whole ubutnu ecosystem is broken IMO. Shuttleworth goes on about meritocracy, that IMO its used a way to ignore the 'community' and deflection of potentially good ideas.
|
I agree totally, and this will probably get me in alot of strife but I found nothing but brick walls in various Ubuntu "teams". If you don't tow the line you don't get a chance to be involved and a heap of political correctness crap gets thrown at you. There is nothing about "team work".
You got me ranting, lol.
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 03:59 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01
I believed it for about 6 months. The only things that kept me with Ubuntu was the fact I was so green and Ubuntu was very easy to learn, was being the operative word. How many businesses after 8 years of running at a loss are still worth keeping? Kubuntu has been dropped after 7 years. Why is Canonical which has never made a profit yet still operating? Mark has money, good on him I acknowledge self made people, but I doubt Canonical would still be able to operate if it wasn't for the fact he planted it on the Isle of Man.
|
I dont think that the isle of Man location would have much impact on a business running at a loss. IF its running at a loss..private company, based in a tax haven...try finding the financial statements for companies in that situaton.
So you can see I'm not convinced that canonical is running at a loss. If they are, its because it suits Shuttleworth for it to do so (canoncial keeps its 'underdog' status, it gets more sympathy from end users and other distros). There were reports from several years ago that 'canonical is close to breakign even', and the company has expanded since then.
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01
Yes there were a group of us who suggested it back when 8.04 was being developed, BUT, as you have said, inconvenient topics/threads cannot be found and I can't find them in my own thread list  . To be fair they did say they were going to "archive" old material.
|
They have 'archived' old threads, but the locking/jailing of inconvenient posts, threads and ideas moves them out of public view totally (you can still view the 'archived' threads). AFAIK only admins/mods/etc from the ubutnu forums can see the jailed posts/threads.
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01
I agree totally, and this will probably get me in alot of strife but I found nothing but brick walls in various Ubuntu "teams". If you don't tow the line you don't get a chance to be involved and a heap of political correctness crap gets thrown at you. There is nothing about "team work".
|
Of course. The 'teams' take orders/direction from the 'team leaders', the team leaders take orders/direction from the forum council, the forum council takes orders/direction from canonical...and canonical takes orders/direction from Mr. Shuttleworth. Its a hierachical system.
The teams largely exist to implement the wishes of those above it. The secondary purpose of the teams is so that if any (unforseen) ideas pop up, they can be managed by the team, team leader, forum council and canonical.
Its actually quite a cunning and machiavellian system.
|
|
|
02-13-2012, 12:44 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
I dont think that the isle of Man location would have much impact on a business running at a loss. IF its running at a loss..private company, based in a tax haven...try finding the financial statements for companies in that situaton.
|
That was my point, I realise I wasn't very eloquent when I was making it  If it wasn;t for the location it would have alot more scrutiny, government watchdogs, public watchdogs etc.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|