LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
User Name
Password
Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2015, 12:12 AM   #1
LXer
LXer NewsBot
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 96,937

Rep: Reputation: 102Reputation: 102
LXer: No, Department of Justice, 80 Percent of Tor Traffic Is Not Child Porn


Published at LXer:

The debate over online anonymity, and all the whistleblowers, trolls, anarchists, journalists and political dissidents it enables, is messy enough. It doesn't need the US government making up bogus statistics about how much that anonymity facilitates child pornography.

Read More...
 
Old 01-29-2015, 12:12 PM   #2
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491
I think if Tor got rid of the darkweb/hidden services altogether its image would improve tremendously. It seems that although only a small percentage of Tor use is the darkweb, that is what politicians and people in general focus on and blow it out of proportion. Get rid of it and Tor may become a more accepted anonymity solution.
 
Old 01-31-2015, 10:23 AM   #3
LinuxUser42
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Distribution: Lubuntu, Raspbian, Openelec, messing with others.
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by metaschima View Post
I think if Tor got rid of the darkweb/hidden services altogether its image would improve tremendously. It seems that although only a small percentage of Tor use is the darkweb, that is what politicians and people in general focus on and blow it out of proportion. Get rid of it and Tor may become a more accepted anonymity solution.
Thank you for the irony. You want to censor a tool that was developed to get around censorship?
 
Old 01-31-2015, 10:45 AM   #4
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 6,970

Rep: Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021
I think that the governments of the US and UK ought to spend even a tenth of the amount of money they spend on wars abroad on proper policing to actually track down child abusers and jail them. I also think they should stop spending all our money on watching everything everyone does on the internet in case we are "terrorists" or "paedophiles" and, instead, spend that on social reform and community building.
Won't happen though as catching real child abusers (as opposed to those who look at images) doesn't allow them to spend millions with their friends at IT companies on spying on everyone.
 
Old 01-31-2015, 10:53 AM   #5
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: AntiX 17 , ChromeOS
Posts: 5,326
Blog Entries: 20

Rep: Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511Reputation: 2511
Any body ever standing in front of a govt. clerk. Like to renew your drivers license. Knows no thinking or effort
is going on in the job description.

Govt job by it's very meaning means inept, get nothing done.

So why would anybody be surprised when they get things wrong?
 
Old 01-31-2015, 11:59 AM   #6
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by LinuxUser42 View Post
Thank you for the irony. You want to censor a tool that was developed to get around censorship?
I want to alter it so as to make it more likely to be accepted by society. You don't need the darkweb/hidden services to get around censorship. You can still visit other regular sites with Tor and maintain some degree of anonymity (full anonymity being impossible).
 
Old 01-31-2015, 12:07 PM   #7
LinuxUser42
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Distribution: Lubuntu, Raspbian, Openelec, messing with others.
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 18
Censorship, is still censorship.
The government uses Tor to connect to its embassies and such (there was an article a few years back, about how they had failed to secure it to an embassy and the leaks that happened). I would expect things like them looking to fund asassinations and such, to be part of the "darkweb". (one option to get rid of terrorists)
This is a tool that isn't used by just one society and societies don't always agree with one another, you can judge another society, but not being a part of that society, then you must commit to war to change that society.
 
Old 01-31-2015, 12:11 PM   #8
Miati
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2014
Distribution: Linux Mint 17.*
Posts: 326

Rep: Reputation: 106Reputation: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by metaschima View Post
I want to alter it so as to make it more likely to be accepted by society. You don't need the darkweb/hidden services to get around censorship. You can still visit other regular sites with Tor and maintain some degree of anonymity (full anonymity being impossible).
Say I want to host extremely controversial content located in and is about a repressive government. One that would jail me for communicating messages not politically.. beneficial to the government.

Yeaup...

Let's make it easier for the government to track and squash free speech - just so people can feel better about tor's image.
____

This is something that must be accepted. The same technology that protects criminals, protects people who have a controversial message to say. It also protects peoples privacy - regardless of criminal intent.

Last edited by Miati; 01-31-2015 at 12:15 PM.
 
Old 01-31-2015, 12:22 PM   #9
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 6,970

Rep: Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021
As I aluded to in my previous post I do not think that "child porn" causes the abuse of children and I think it is the "low hanging fruit" that governments can have their police forces spend money on targeting as somebody, somewhere, will have been careless when looking at it or could even have inadvertently looked at it while looking for something else.
Child abuse, however, is much more difficult to stop and our governments show time and time again that they fail in stopping it.

By the way, I would be happy to live in a world where "child porn" did not exist and I find it morally repognant I just do not think that jailing somebody with pictures of naked children or, even, children being abused will stop that abuse happening.
 
Old 01-31-2015, 12:47 PM   #10
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491Reputation: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273 View Post
By the way, I would be happy to live in a world where "child porn" did not exist and I find it morally repognant I just do not think that jailing somebody with pictures of naked children or, even, children being abused will stop that abuse happening.
You are probably right, but let's say a certain percentage of the producers are tracked down after they upload it.

What I'm saying is that by removing the darknet from Tor you will greatly increase its popularity while maintaining its ability to keep you anonymous. As 80% of the darknet is devoted to CP and the rest to drugs and assassinations, I will not miss it, and I don't think most people would. Yeah, you could call it censorship, but I would call it dealing with underground crime as most people would. I would actually say it would be a win for anonymity because Tor would become more popular and acceptable. The darknet is the main reason why I don't use Tor or find its use acceptable except in oppressive regimes.
 
Old 01-31-2015, 01:00 PM   #11
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 6,970

Rep: Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021Reputation: 2021
Quote:
Originally Posted by metaschima View Post
You are probably right, but let's say a certain percentage of the producers are tracked down after they upload it.

What I'm saying is that by removing the darknet from Tor you will greatly increase its popularity while maintaining its ability to keep you anonymous. As 80% of the darknet is devoted to CP and the rest to drugs and assassinations, I will not miss it, and I don't think most people would. Yeah, you could call it censorship, but I would call it dealing with underground crime as most people would. I would actually say it would be a win for anonymity because Tor would become more popular and acceptable. The darknet is the main reason why I don't use Tor or find its use acceptable except in oppressive regimes.
I do tend to agree to a point but remember there is no way to remove child abuse images without checking all content so who would police it? As has been mentioned the "darknet" can also contain things which governments call "terrorism" but most people would call "the truth".
To me ToT (and, indeed, the whole internet) should be like a conversation in an English pub tap room where anything is allowed and nobody but the fellow drinkers are listening.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: How to force all network traffic through Tor on Fedora LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-21-2013 06:11 PM
LXer: How To Set Up A TOR Middlebox Routing All VirtualBox Virtual Machine Traffic Over The TOR Netw LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-08-2012 12:30 PM
TOR: traffic between my workstation TOR entry point really not encrypted..? john99 Incognito 3 11-11-2009 02:06 AM
LXer: Obama Taps Fifth RIAA Lawyer to Justice Department LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-13-2009 06:50 PM
LXer: RIAA and BSA's Favorite Lawyers Taking Top Department of Justice Posts LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-06-2009 12:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration