LXer: Mandriva 2007: Why is this distribution still around?
Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
LXer: Mandriva 2007: Why is this distribution still around?
Published at LXer:
Naming distribution versions after a calendar year sounds familiar to me. I'm thinking of Windows 95, of course. And my experience with French distribution Mandriva 2007 brought me back to those frustrating times I used to have with Microsoft's decade-old offering.
little harsh in a way, but still read in an open mind. I primary use Mandriva 2007, and can relate in a way about the cost.
However, it seems to work well for me, more than what I can understand using suselinux.
Some have luck with it, others don't. Some love opensuse, but I can't get that thing to work like I can with mandriva.
I think he's very wrong in his saying what he has.
First off, this is the first Mandriva that has released a free and non-free version at the same time. That is a step in the right directions.
Secondly, their downloads are still 100% available for free.
Third, they include Cedega, LinDVD and Flatout (plus more stuff). Those three are three very NON-FREE software titles. You can build Cedega from source, but not like it is in its Mandriva 2007 form.
Lastly--what is wrong with Mandriva offering a pay-for version--especially with a free version sitting right beside it? Novell, Red Hat, Linspire, Xandros and MANNNNNY others have a pay for version.
someone I think in mandriva.com forum said we should stand up and fight for this, to have only free open source software, no closed source software.
To me, this is a computer. If your job pays you 10 an hour, and you know it's over, a lay off or fired, you'll just go through it, and find another job. If it's 20 an hour, you'd be more up to fighting for your job.
Linux is great, don't get me wrong, but this is just a computer system, and in most cases, free or cheaper than Microsoft Windows, so to me, I see no point in fighting. I'm glad they have these such features, even if I had to pay 75 for it, still better than paying 50 for XP. yes, 50. I see that at Amazon, how long that'd be, hard to say.
and a final note, if you have the choice of a free distro with all open source, and the same distro with closed source software, what is the argument?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.