LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
User Name
Password
Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2013, 05:01 PM   #1
LXer
LXer NewsBot
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 111,786

Rep: Reputation: 118Reputation: 118
LXer: Has SourceForge been judged unfairly?


Published at LXer:

Today in Open Source: Have some folks been unfair to SourceForge? Plus: MATE added to Debian repositories, and a screenshot tour of Angel Linux.

Read More...
 
Old 11-21-2013, 05:30 PM   #2
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,502

Rep: Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617
unfair to SourceForge ?
yes and no

new people that are on Win7 or xp will get BUNDLED garbage crap-ware in the installer
and they will tell two friends and they will tell two.... and so on


word of mouth dose work when it is NEGATIVE
 
Old 11-21-2013, 05:40 PM   #3
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=14, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 5,434
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398
I was unaware of this so I read the story, followed the links and did a little further reading.

As I understand it, SF has implemented a 100% opt-in (by developer) with only 3 takers so far, which allows them to bundle 100% vetted software with 100% detailed removal instructions, with 100% disclosure, with selected binary only downloads.

It would be different if they were messing with the sources or sneaking things in unbeknownst to the user, but from what I have read, that does not appear to be the case.

It does not affect me as I do not run any M$ instances and would not download and install a binary anyway. For M$ users who must daily contend with a torrent of sneakware/spyware/crapware/malware/dirty-underwear, the full disclousre aspect is probably confusing and very suspicious looking!

Tempest in a tea-pot...

I am still a SF fan and think they are worth supporting.

Last edited by astrogeek; 11-21-2013 at 05:41 PM.
 
Old 11-21-2013, 06:13 PM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867Reputation: 4867
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrogeek View Post
As I understand it, SF has implemented a 100% opt-in (by developer) with only 3 takers so far, which allows them to bundle 100% vetted software with 100% detailed removal instructions, with 100% disclosure, with selected binary only downloads.

It would be different if they were messing with the sources or sneaking things in unbeknownst to the user, but from what I have read, that does not appear to be the case.
That is also what I got from reading about that. My conclusion: As long as users are informed before the download that there are 3rd party apps bundled I don't care. It is up to the user to decide if he wants that or rather uses a different download source, I will use SF the same way as I have before.
 
Old 11-21-2013, 06:57 PM   #5
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 9,753

Rep: Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407
For the record, it was me who reported Flareget to Sourceforge and got it removed.

And if I recall correctly, they were hosting all sorts of binary-only crap in addition to that, at the time.

Last edited by dugan; 11-21-2013 at 07:04 PM.
 
Old 11-21-2013, 07:02 PM   #6
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=14, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 5,434
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398
@dugan: I am not sure I understand the connection between Flareget and the bundling described by the article. I did not see them mentioned in anything I read related to this article.

Was Flareget reported because it was not open seource, or because it was bundling other software?
 
Old 11-21-2013, 07:05 PM   #7
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 9,753

Rep: Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407Reputation: 4407
Not open source.
 
Old 11-21-2013, 07:07 PM   #8
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=14, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 5,434
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398Reputation: 3398
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
Not open source.
OK thanks.

Yea, I have seen several "projects" (aka marketing campaigns) appear on SF and other hosts as "open source", but were just more crapware. There is a lot of that going around...
 
Old 11-21-2013, 07:30 PM   #9
John VV
LQ Muse
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: A2 area Mi.
Posts: 17,502

Rep: Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617Reputation: 2617
I have been building programs from SF for the last 12 years
even on windows i avoided the binary installers

BUT
others do use those windows installers
and the IMPECCABLE REPUTATION once had got a black eye
-- fixable but will take time .
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: - Buffy vs Edward - remix unfairly removed by Lionsgate LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-11-2013 07:41 AM
LQ user being unfairly blamed asks for revindication. stf92 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 12-13-2010 10:26 PM
LXer: SourceForge Inc changes its name to Geeknet LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-09-2009 11:11 PM
LXer: SourceForge Grows Up - and Out LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-19-2009 02:10 PM
LXer: Wall Street Journal Unfairly Reviews Ubuntu LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-18-2007 04:10 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration