LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Syndicated Linux News (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/syndicated-linux-news-67/)
-   -   LXer: An Open Letter to Richard Stallman (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/syndicated-linux-news-67/lxer-an-open-letter-to-richard-stallman-4175458705/)

LXer 04-18-2013 08:51 PM

LXer: An Open Letter to Richard Stallman
 
Published at LXer:

An Open Letter to Richard Stallman, proposing to name the GNU/Linux just GNix, to make it easier to say, and to write. Instead of the long GNU/Linux or the plain Linux where GNU gets no credit.

Read More...

H_TeXMeX_H 04-19-2013 01:57 AM

It's not a bad idea. The only problem is that GNU no longer stands for anything if you have just GN. However, as GNU only stands for "GNU is Not Linux", I doubt there is any way to make sense of it at all. In conclusion, it might just work.

brianL 04-19-2013 05:31 AM

Gnu's Not Unix.
Is it really difficult typing/writing GNU/Linux? Or saying gnu linux?

ruario 04-19-2013 06:41 AM

Stallman already wanted a clever name. He suggested lignux for the OS and linux for the kernel (with the 'g' being silent in the first so that they are both pronounced the same). Linus and others shot him down. Anyway, this is a stupid idea IMHO, things are too ingrained now. People are not going to switch and start calling distros Gnix. Hell Ubuntu does not even bother mentioning Linux any more. Have a look at http://www.ubuntu.com/, http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop or even http://www.ubuntu.com/server/ and try and find any mention of Linux on those pages.

ruario 04-19-2013 06:58 AM

Also Gnix is too generic. Is it supposed to mean GNU on top of a UNIX-like kernel. If so how do you tell the difference between the Debian variants based on the Linux and FreeBSD kernels? They are both Gnix, right? The more I think about it the more dumb it all sounds.

cortman 04-19-2013 08:01 AM

I try and honor Stallman and the FSF's contributions by using GNU/Linux as often as I can as opposed to Linux. Must say I don't like "Gnix". Actually, I really don't like the hard g in GNU or Gnix- makes it awkward to say. The animal "gnu" is pronounced the same as "new" anyway.
Lignux was a great idea.

vtel57 04-19-2013 11:20 AM

Wow! The LXer bot picked me up and I got linked to here at LinuxQ. Man! I've hit the big time. ;)

Cheers,

~Eric

TobiSGD 04-19-2013 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruario (Post 4934695)
Also Gnix is too generic. Is it supposed to mean GNU on top of a UNIX-like kernel. If so how do you tell the difference between the Debian variants based on the Linux and FreeBSD kernels? They are both Gnix, right? The more I think about it the more dumb it all sounds.

The Debian variant with FreeBSD kernel is called GNU/kfreebsd, not GNU/Unix, so no, Gnix wouldn't fit to that. Unix, in opposite to Linux, is not just a kernel, but a complete operating system.

Anyways, I like the idea, but I don't think that it is really viable to get all people together to use Gnix instead of Linux, too many large egos, to many people opposed to change.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.