SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello everybody,
I am new to this forum. I'd like to know if the problem "Windows XP no longer boots after installation of Suse 9.1" has been fixed for Suse 9.2.
Thank you for your help.
Strange that this question is asked so often. One must think that the SuSE/Novell people are really stupid to include a known (and fixed) bug into their new version again. But maybe you are right to as this question, so many stupid things happen...so here's my answer: I don't know, but I think it's most probable that it has been fixed.
This booting problem was caused by the tool parted, that wrote a defect partition table after NTFS resize. Those who did not need to resize their Windows partitions (or used a 3rd party tools) where not affected. SuSE offered a fixed version of parted to repair the partition table (see: http://portal.suse.com/sdb/en/2004/0...booting91.html )
From what I gather that bug is mainly caused by Parted and would not exist if I resized the NTFS partition with a third party tool before installing Suse.
No the bug exists and you loose all the windows and mandrake if you have that to.
I went out and bought the 9.1 professional thinking they wouldn't release a distro that did not dual boot, alas they have so back to the comfort and feel of mandrake and 10.1 is so much better than 10.
I just prefer a distro that puts everything in and not have to ad. I still have not been able to get the secure htttps working with it certificate or not.
Wish they would fix these problems and it would be a great winner. I suggest someone at SuSE tries Mandrake and see what they are up against the addition of the Mandrake ease of use and especially the boot loader would be great.
Now one should have to go and use a disc partioner from another source to get a distro working and especially having to reload and use Mandrake to clean up the disc after SuSE has been around.
I think your are picking a little too much on SuSE, especially as it was not the question if the bug exists or not. We all know it is there, we all know about the fix (that's why no one needs to lose a XP partition). BTW: not only SuSE was affected, a couple of other distros (including Mandrake) used this buggy parted version, too.
Even if I repeat myself too often: why the hell should this bug be included in 9.2 again?
kydung: Not mainly caused by parted, exclusively
And you are right: no problems with 3rd party tools and already existing free space.
Hi All
It's not just a problem with parted, on another forum a guy dual installed XP and SUSE using partition magic and still lost XP.
The reason, he put SUSE in partitions before XP.
All Windows Oses hog the first primary partition as pagefile (linux swap), so if you put anything other than a windows compatible file structure on Hda1 (windows C: ) windows refuses to work.
Mad Malc
Finally I will wait for 9.2 so to avoid that bug. I shall shrink my XP partition with Acronis Partition Expert ,leave unallocated free space and let Yast create linux partitions. Is that right?
Thanks everybody.
Distribution: SuSE 9.2, Slackware Current, Arch Linux 0.7
Posts: 119
Rep:
wow... just wow
barrys... what can I say? you're dumb. Please don't post ads for Mandrake in a SuSE forum when someone is asking a legitimate question about SuSE, not weather or not they should use Mandrake... not trying to flame anyone but wow...
Anyways on to the question... I never ran into this issue and have been dual-booting XP/SuSE since SuSE 8.2, but then again I never resized my partitions with the SuSE Installer, if I needed to do that I did it with Symantec's Partitionmagic 8, and I would assume that the good people at SuSE would have fixed a known bug as opposed to acknowledging it and leaving it be.
so if you phear the bug use 3rd party software to resize partitions prior to installing SuSE... but I'm 99.99% sure that known bugs will be taken care of
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.