SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by apachedude I'm talking about this ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/9.2/README.txt
Yes, I was able to upgrade with YaST into KDE 3.3.1. That was the only thing available from the SuSE FTP site.
If I'm wrong, feel free to tell me what you did to get the rpms (for SuSE 9.2, the older ones are perfectly fine).
You can do it through Yast add remove software by adding a new installation source
Yast
Change Source of Installation
Add ftp
Server name ftp.suse.com
Directory on server pub/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_9.2/yast-source
OK
Finish
Now go to install remove software, in the search, search kde, on the right hand side, right click and choose all in list choose the the option to update if newer version available
It will update only your existing kde files that updates are available for, it will not install anything more. I prefer this to downloading all of kde and doing rpm -Uvh *.rpm
You can also add the packman sites rpms this way. That way you can install mplayer and many other applications and all their dependencies without googling and searching, or downloading, just install mplayer and it will grab all the necessary depencies from packmans site.
I also copied the i586 directory from the DVD to my hard drive and added that as a source, so I no longer have to put the disk in every time I want to add something.
I am sorry to hear some of you are having problems with version 9.2. My first Linux distro was Suse 8.1 Pro. Later, I tried Redhat 8 and really liked RH9. I started adding Ximian Desktop 2 and liked it so much that I paid for 3 annual subscriptions so I could use the deluxe version of XD2 on 3 personal computers.
I think SUSE 9.0 came out around the time Novell bought Ximian. Since I heard Ximian would add support for SUSE I gave 9.0 a try. It still did not give me everything I wanted so I switched to and really liked Fedora. SUSE 9.1 came out and I was curious about the first version after the Novell purchase, so I gave it a try. It seems like unlike most other people, I had major problems with 9.1. I could not even install it if I had my Microsoft USB and PS2 keyboard connected on my main computer, it would not install on my laptop and on the kids' (AMD 750 with FIC SD11 mainboard) computer I had to disable too much to get a working system. So, I went back to Fedora again. Although I was not thrilled with SUSE 9.1, I still felt it had a lot to offer and felt that it was the best and most complete alternative to an MS desktop.
I liked what I saw in the previews of SUSE 9.2 so I decided to give it a try. I have not read anything that suggests there were any "dramatic" changes, but it seems obvious to me that there was much "tweaking under the hood." I should add that I am strictly a Gnome desktop user, although I do use a few programs such as K3B and Quanta Plus. Their new Gnome desktop is excellent vs. in past versions when it seemed Gnome was almost an afterthought.
I have a Netgear wireless router setup, but all computers plug with cables into the router or a bridge. My AMD XP3000 ASRock SIS, AMD XP2400 VIA, old HP AMD K2 laptop and the kids' new Celeron 1.7 VIA computers all work FLAWLESSLY. Sound works, my nVidia drivers still work after kernel updates. Everything works! This includes HP printers, scanners, an Epson printer and the USB network hub on the laptop. Performance is excellent, we have experienced zero lockups and no programs have crashed since installation 5 weeks ago.
I run a rather large company and can be at my computers up to 20 hours per day. I have extensive use of Internet, e-mail, word processing, digital images and web development. It is a plus for me that programs such as Realplayer and Adobe Reader are set up and ready to go. If I click on a file on a website or receive an attachment with Evolution, OpenOffice, Adobe, video or imaging programs automatically open just as they should. I never had this happen with other distros without much tweaking.
Setting up APT and Synaptic was a breeze. APT/Synaptic now seems to go through an extra step when installing codecs and update files so that it configures the system after an update just like YAST. After adding the necessary codecs, for the first time ever, Mplayer and Totem actually work with every video file I have thrown at them! I never had the same success with Redhat/Fedora.
I too install cutting edge updates. I have tried, but have been unable to break SUSE 9.2. So yes, I am extremely happy. I have not yet tried "iFolders" that I installed off the SUSE DVD. For my personal situation, the only way things could get better would be if Novell added a Linux replacement for Quickbooks.
I have installed all of the KDE updates, but just so KB3, etc. stays up to date. If you are having problems with KDE, perhaps you could try the new Gnome desktop.
I just got suse 9.2 and as of now im pissed cause i have no clue how to use it, so if some of you fans of suse out there could help me get started and tell me how to do some stuff. like get wine to work and fine a program like dvdshrink and get a p2p working that would be great.
Jmapson: I guess that opening a new thread with more specific questions will help others finding and answering your questions.
Instead of dvdshrink, try Video-DVDRip/transcode, although I never used it I think it has some similar functionality. What p2p would you like to run. I had no problems at all installing limewire.
Originally posted by Jmapson thats just it I dont really know how to install anything I have only had linux for about a day and this is my first time ever using it. im lost
You can't learn in a day. It took me 12 months to learn Winbloze and about the same time to learn Linux.
Too bad to hear some of your woes with Suse 9.2 ...
Personally I have a:
AMD 64 3200+
MSI K8T NEO FSR
ATI RADEON 9600XT
20 GB Fugitsu drive
80 GB WD drive
LG Dvd burner
LG Cd recorder
and after trying:
Debian Woody,
Debian Sarge,
Debina Sid,
Redhat 9,
Fedora Core II,
Fedora Core III, and
Suse 9.1
Suse 9.2 was the ONLY distro that came close to automatically detecting my hardware. Suse all the way for me (however, on an older more recognized compu./server Debian is great).
I went out and bought the SuSE 9.2 box from Fry's and installed it on my system. To say that I'm impressed is an understatement!
Installation was a breeze--it found all my hardware-- and it is very stable. Last night I installed Doom3 demo and played it with no issues what so ever.
I had more problems with version 9.1, mostly with power management where my monitor would go blank at random times, even when power management was turned off. I purchased the 9.2 update and did a clean install, and haven't had a single problem at all. I don't intend to update KDE to the next version which may cause some stability problems. Suse 9.2 is faster than 9.1 and much more stable. I currently have a Dell 8100 1.3GHz and waiting for my AMD64 3500 system from Monarch...will install the 64-bit version and see how that goes.
been using suse 9.2 since it came out... On my laptop and main system. I have found no errors but I started a thread.. for networking on a 64bit with 9.2.. and it is still is not resolved... great OS but as with windows it will have errors on different systems.
been using suse 9.2 since it came out... On my laptop and main system. I have found no errors but I started a thread.. for networking on a 64bit with 9.2.. and it is still is not resolved... great OS but as with windows it will have errors on different systems.
T
So I suppose I am having a particularly tough luck. I went back to 9.1 and all my problems disappeared like magic.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.