LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   SUSE / openSUSE (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/suse-opensuse-60/)
-   -   Hit several major snags in SuSE 10 (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/suse-opensuse-60/hit-several-major-snags-in-suse-10-a-374128/)

KimVette 10-17-2005 11:17 PM

Hit several major snags in SuSE 10
 
Well the SuSE DVDs came in last week, Saturday I backed up most of my stuff (all the stuff I cared about) and wiped the drive.

Installed SuSE 10, and found several major problems, which I have replicated on other systems with different chipsets and different processors:

1. Evolution WILL NOT connect to exchange via the Exchange connector. After a few google searches I found that this is a confirmed bug and a fix has already been checked in - it was checked in prior to the release of SuSE 10 actually! No update is available via YaST so I had to resort to using IMAP/SMTP for email and Kontact for calendaring (or go back to SuSE 9.3, or Windows). I am very disappointed in that, especially since Ximian Evolution is now a Novell product and they should have caught this problem prior to putting out release candidates, let alone calling it a gold build. Basic smoketesting of the functionality would have caught this defect.

2. kdar will hard lock the system. dar from the command line works fine.

3. As usual, xine is crippled. I am currently trying to sort that out but one update I applied results in hard cashes.

4. Recompiling the kernel to optimize it results in 842,278,281 warnings. OK, slight exaggeration, but there is a confirmed building bug in the 2.6.13-15 kernel source which results in the repeated warnings, and likewise a fix was checked in even prior to release of the release candidate builds, let alone gold. This should have been caught during the build process, way before smoketesting. Hell, that should not have even made it to smoketesting - the build should have been rejected outright. Never in my career have I ever let any project with more than 9 warnings go to QA, let alone to a customer. Warnings aren't usually fatal (very rarely are they) but they're a good indication of missing code, incomplete or incorrect code version checkin, reliance on deprecated calls, or simply sloppiness.

{edit} I'm not ranting, by the way. I am just venting. Likewise, I have now learned that there is a definite pattern with SuSE - skip the even-numbered releases and buy only the odd-numbered releases - or wait a month or two for fixes to be released on YaST. I hated 9.0 (my first experience with SuSE), loved 9.1 (samba issues aside), hated 9.2 and loved 9.3, and so far am hating 10.0. Also I noticed many media programs are missing. I could have sworn audacity was bundled in 9.1 and 9.3 but it is nowhere to be found in 10.0{/edit}

KimVette 10-18-2005 03:08 PM

Update:

1. Evolution: So far I have not heard from Novell after sending them an email (believe me it was not as harsh as my post here). They're a big company so hearing back from them could take weeks. ;) I am pissed about this though - there is no excuse that their very own project should be so broken with such a critical defect. In a larger corporate environment this would definitely be a showstopper for a Linux rollout. *censors self*

2. kdar - I have not re-tested it yet. I am still searching for packages I [i]use to have[/u] in previous versions (e.g., Audacity, webmin, and others) but are no longer included with SuSE. I'm also recompiling for better hardware support, particularly the correct processor. I will be re-testing kdar tomorrow.

3. I fixed xine by installing a build from last December - same build I've been running since SuSE 9.1. {edit} As far as the hard locking of the machines were concerned, when I installed I had inadvertantly selected libxine1-dxr3 without reading closely enough. {/edit}

4. Compiler warnings seemed to go away when selecting the correct, specific processor type (previously the generic 586/686/etc. definition was selected). Still, with the default settings I should never have seen those thousands of compiler warnings. Also, when reviewing menuconfig and the Makefile I may have discovered why SMT never seemed to work right for me in the past. Recompiling SMP with SMT support to see if I can get it working properly this time around.

I have other complaints - mostly about some changes in KDE, but that's not Novell's doing.

paul_e_t 10-18-2005 06:35 PM

Wishing you the best of luck.
Just standing by and watching
while listening to "On The Beautiful Danube" a Classical
doesn't hurt me head at all, is calming.

:cool:

KimVette 10-19-2005 08:09 PM

paul_e_t>

Funny. :)

Well everything is fixed except for Evolution. :( Also: SMP/SMT are working correctly now. SMT is a poor substitute for SMP though. I am really looking forward to the dual-core Xeons, then I'll go with what will effectively be a four-way box (8-way hyperthreading)

paul_e_t 10-20-2005 03:19 PM

Re your last.
If you read back in your posts and think a bit, you will be able to understand how it is that Linux in general is going down a difficult road as far as being able to compete with $S Win's in the general marketplace. What we really need us a Commercial Linux that is plug and play :>)
Keep up the good works.
Paul

KimVette 10-20-2005 04:58 PM

SuSE is actually very close but only just misses the mark. You can't blame Novell for having difficulty in implementing an open source Exchange-compatible email client, but you can blame them for shipping one that is broken when a previous release worked flawlessly.

Novell posted an update for it on YOU today - I downloaded it and it partially worked. I think I need to delete all traces of Evolution config files from ~ and start over.

paul_e_t 10-21-2005 02:12 PM

You seem to be well versed in running Linux. Just think how a $S user feels. After being used to popping in a new program CD, select install, and then enjoying the new program to the fullest. The new user, who knows little about Linux, who doesn't know what command line means, who is expecting great things, trys out Linux wanting a dual boot system then finds out that his original $S XP program no longer exists and the Linux he is hopefully running needs an associate degree in DP in order to operate somewhat. And help ? He needs a running system before one gets on line help. Linux is not listed in the phone book so who does one call? As I said we need a commercial, stable, reliable, Linux version that can offer support for new users. Commercial here does NOT mean make lots of profit. Just Linux centers where users can go and get help from a paid staff who want Linux for everyone. Heck. . . . . .$S has help for it's group of tech's why not Linux ! I think I'll look see what Linspire offers in the way of continued support.
I do hope everything goes well with you and your system does you good.
Lurking
Paul

broch 10-21-2005 03:30 PM

I realised, reading all these complaints that this is not worth switching to 10.0 from 9.3.
The only thing I am missing from 10.0 is gcc4. But I suspect that real power of this new version will be revealed later. So in fact I don't think that I am missing anything.

I will wait for 10.1. The real argument is that version 10.0 does not add anything really new. Bumping from version to version only to be up to date makes no sense to me.

fragos 10-21-2005 08:08 PM

When discussing installing on MS vs Linux, one has to consider that Linux comes with so much, many won't need to install anything. With MS its pretty useless until you spent a lot of many on a large number of commercial packages just to make a usable system. Adding hardware into a Linux system less frequently requires you to install new software.

paul_e_t 10-23-2005 09:08 PM

Re: FRAGOS post #9

I agree with you. However, do you think it would be best to have a basic operating system install w/o all the super supporting software and just include basic small packages similiar to $S's Works that do a small job, and can be an easier, broader (in sense of HW) install? After all, how many people can use the full capabalities of Office.org or MySQL ? Most people are using just word processing and once in a while a DB or drawing application for photo touch-up (a mini Gimp).
What's ya think ?

and we need to more than just thank a Vet.; we need to provide more hugs, jobs, better med, life insurance, again better (not more money) medical support and better pay increases. Gosh ya got me going here, I'd better tone down a bit :>)

Should we start a new thread on Linux attributes ?

Paul

paul_e_t 10-23-2005 09:14 PM

Re: BROCH post #8

I'll be doing the same an wait for 10.1. I had bad luck with 9.3 so I'll sit by for another 7 months without SuSE or could switch versions.

unionjak 10-24-2005 02:48 PM

win xp
 
hello,
i think if you add up the time it takes you(and really add it up) to do the following, you will relise just how amazingly easy linux is to install AND then maintain :-
first off you have to remove adware from the (XP) system...almost everyday.
then, you have to cross your fingers that a virus does`nt take the system out, just before you complete MISSION CRITICAL work.
It is at this point, after a few days that you wounder if your shiney sli based athlon system has had tar spilled into it because its sooooo slow.(clogged up with "addware" you never asked for).
Then when you have lost most of your hair sorting out the above, but never really acumplishing anything because you know it will all start again....unexplained crashes and zany behaviour become the norm.....UNTILL...WAIT FOR IT......you have to format the hardrive because the whole thing is borked. Tell me you have not had to do this, a few times on a xp system ?

KimVette 10-24-2005 03:06 PM

One great feature Windows has is spellcheck practically everywhere. ;) *J/K*

paul_e_t 10-24-2005 03:31 PM

Re: unionjak post #12
I haven't had any of those XP problems at all - nada. I don't run IE except when I'm forced to, where, for instance, a web system checks browsers and I can't use Firefox. "SunTrust Bank" is an example. As a matter of fact the only time I had problems with $S XP was when I installed SuSE 9.3 and had boot problems where I couldn't bring up XP. I lost a bunch of documents and photo's that I had backed up on another system using wind ME but when I went to load 9.3 on that system I lost everything ( got caught with the bad parted prog bug I didn't know about). Customer continued support is nonexsistant and ends 6 months after product cycle. I haven't had one email teling me of any OS problems or updates from the package owners. One can get automatic system updates but who knows what the updates are doing? At least $S send out a notice via email. The $S XP updates were just about as long as the SuSE updates if I recall about five hours or more on an ISDN connection. Lots of hard creative work lost . . .lost. The lesson here is that if one is to dual boot then make a 4 way back up once in a while, be very careful with the new issues of Linux (but, this could apply to any OS).
Anyway it seems that $S is finally trying to get its' act together but I'm not going to buy their application packages any more if I can help it. I'd rather donate money to the FSF. The XP on this Unit came OEM installed. Those are my opinions and I'm sticking to'em.

unionjak 10-24-2005 04:32 PM

soz aboooot smelling checher....lol
 
hello,
soz about spalling check but am abit blasted, so there...lol.
I respect you for your views, and as an ex win xp beta tester i can tell you that i am not too sure which was the more secure...the sp2 or beta.

supwiddiss 10-24-2005 09:06 PM

Re:
 
If you'll allow me to post (yes I'm new to Linux). KimVette you sound like you know your way around Linux pretty good.

I can't compile, write code, build a driver....nothing, yet! I can put the cd or dvd in, boot the cpu, install the os and hopefully have a running machine in about 40 minutes. Such was my experience installing Suse 9.1 and 10. I was psyched when the pc booted to a desktop. I was prepared to start learning.

I wanted to share my net connection with my other XP machine (both were XP Pro). I wanted to see what the Bluetooth thing on my cell phone was good for, so I went and bought a usb bluetooth adapter for like 20 bucks. I discovered quickly that I could use a pair of Bluetooth adapters to share net connectons. I got my, what now is my Suse 10, box to share a bridged connection and had about 400 kbs transfer speed and internet to boot. That cost me a little over 40 bucks total and I was satisfied with it completely. Going to Suse and trying to get a net connection was futile. So I get some Linksys stuff, a wireless card and a cool wireless router. NOW I had to learn ndiswrapper and all sorts of cli stuff just to get that to work, And now it does. The whole essence of anyone having a pc today is to have internet access. With XP I spent 40 bucks and with Linux I spent 240 bucks. Oh, but the software was free, you may say. And if I didnt mind cat5 all over the place I could have had net access pretty painlessly with Linux.

Now, I have Firefox (which I absolutely think is cool) and have people at work using on their Redmond boxes. It's on my Suse box too. But being me I Have to upgrade. I can't get Java to work on the installed version, I cant get Java to work on the installed version after doing the online updates, I can't get Java to work, period! Sun's java checker craps out. I got stressed posting and reading and trying this and that. I shut the box down for a few days. I wait for answers to my posts to stream in, "Oh it's This Easy, You do THIS".....fughettaboutit, no answers to a very valid question. I'm the only person with a fresh install of Suse 9., then 10, who can't get Java to work? My install was fresh and now I have no clue if I should start from scratch because I screwed up the os somehow.

It needs to be easier. I'm all for people hailing any form of Linux to saying how it's so secure, how you dont get viruses, how this and how that....and I'm new here. I can say that if you get a virus or if you get adware or if you corrupt your os with (whats that you call it?) $S (moneysoft?) theres plenty of products to at least get you so you can backup your documents and stuff and wipe the drive and reinstall the os. Installing the apps is easy as pushing the cd drawer closed and answering a few questions. Not painful, really. Sometimes a pain, yes.

All I'm saying is that I chose a Linux version from a reputable firm. It does work, it takes alot of cli stuff that I have no clue what I'm doing as of yet but I will as my skill becomes more refined. It definitely is not easy. Stuff doesn't work. To make it work you have to type for a week and then it may, then you have to learn and remember it. Without internet access I would have never gotten this far. Unortunately I'm posting this on my moneysoft box that works so slick. My eyes hurt and my fingers hurt from the box that sits in my back room, damn computers!

Programs. Where's my programs? I posted on how I could access the files on my two 60 gig drives that I plugged into the Suse box. I suppose it was such a stupid question that everyone stayed out to lunch because I never got a reply for days. Then someone replied that I had to mount the drives. You think with the GUI there would be a plain as day way to mount a drive. Oh yeah, NEVER log in KDE or Gnome as root...which I did (I log in as Administrator in my "easy" os quite frequently) or you'll screw everything up. OOPS! bad messages that wont go away and no reason why, except for a reply to never ever log in as root.

I downloaded Java 1.5.whatever in Yast after putting in a source. I thought it installed. I couldn't find anything resembling Java 1.5 at all anyplace to do the symbolic link thing in the plugins of Firefox (and Mozilla because I thought That would at least work). I discovered that even though I updated online I had to now install the package. I thought that was what updating was all about.

I haven't but scratched the surface of Linux. I'm sorry but i'll have to stand firm and someone will have to convince me that it's "Better". Server 2003 is rampant, it's easy...it works....you tell it how you wish for it to be configured and answer the questions...and, as Kelly Bundy said, "Viola". I have an os, a wireless internet connection establisned on it, I have a few browsers, I can finally at least see files, I need codecs to see some other files for a media player that only plays 1 file at a time (Real), I have several web browsers that none have working Java on (did I mention that yet?). I followed the instuctions to a 't' for installing the apps and I always need to install some other files from the Suse cd's.

You experienced folks know what I mean. What's better if I get gray hair learning how to get simple things to work? Grrrr, dont even dare tell me to get a MAC!

Alan

fragos 10-24-2005 09:39 PM

Alan,

New things can be hard to deal with -- to start they're different. I had my problems when I 1st tried Linux. Being stuborn, I kept at it until it worked. One recommendation I have for you is trust YaST for configuration. If something needs to be set in multiple places it knows and does it. Some distributions almost require CLI and they are much harder to use. Some people help by sending you to CLI -- that's what they know. There are subtle differences between distros and some times even releases of the same distro. Look at things with CLI to learn but in the beginning set with YaST. It will save you much grief help to insure success. As time goes on you will probably use CLI more and more.

Good Luck,

supwiddiss 10-24-2005 10:18 PM

Thanks!
 
Wordy as I may be I thank you for the encouragement. I shall wipe my drive and start from scratch. Seems crazy but now I have many populated and unpopulated Java, Jre folders. Nothing I do works. Now when I check about plugins, mozilla crashes. Firefox isnt much better, It just bounces the ball and eventually does nothing until I delete the symbolic link. then it will launch at least. As for running firefox or mozilla from the cli in terminal, as su....nope, not happening. I type in mozilla and enter and nothing, same for firefox.

I can get wireless working. Good!
I can mount my drives and see the files in them. Good

Seems like in a fresh install Java would at least work, which it never did, not even in konquerer.

Thanks

Alan

unionjak 10-25-2005 05:23 AM

teething troubles
 
hello,
i agree that that not all in suse is paradise, but most is and you will get used to it...remember xp it isn't. I am also a very new user of linux, and a steep learning curve it has been, and not all too pleasant either ! However i needed an operating system to hold my dslr(pro photo) and other work files that would absolutely not crash/become infected/was secure/etc. I am having to learn allot, and as i am what is known as "thick" it is sometimes too much. So i have a break, go on this forum and generally the very kind/very patient more technically minded translate my gibberish into a problem solved. I have successfully loaded a very powerful and secure operating system on to my pc, got internet connection, sorted the printer, loaded all my image files ready to be edited by a hugely powerful(and free) gimp, enabled dvd movie play(Shhhhhh, you didn't here that) and i have even managed to get windows xp games to play. It was all to do with the linux(suse) community and me having to be patient....but trust me if you stick with it you will be amazed as i am, i hope. good luck !

KimVette 10-25-2005 09:33 AM

supwiddiss>

Actually SuSE 9.1 and 9.3 worked very well. SuSE 9.1 had some samba issues and webmin was broken but otherwise it worked very well out of the box, and YaST updates took care of those two problems.

9.3 was by far the best SuSE release I've tried. I should have stayed at 9.3 rather than upgrading. I have been struggling and struggling with Evolution to find a way to get it to connect without resorting to IMAP (I finally decided to use IMAP via KMail, or vice-versa). I finally got KDE<->Samba integration to work last night - it wasn't just plug and play like 9.2 and 9.3. :( Samba worked DAMN well in 9.3

10 should never have been released as it exists. I want to downgrade back to 9.3 but getting back to where I was would easily take a week, between downloading updates, compiling various source packages, etc.

As it is I am still not where I was. I now do not have Cinelerra (need to download source and compile again), I do not have a working WINE (the build of WINE they shipped sucks ass) and I do not have Audacity, which was included in previous releases. :(

--Kim

paul_e_t 10-25-2005 11:02 PM

Good sport
enjoy
standing bye

J.W. 10-26-2005 02:05 AM

Kim - thanks for posting your comments.

MarcRJacobs 10-26-2005 03:08 PM

Hi guys, I am an ex WinBlows user. I've been a programmer for over 30 years now, but an applications coder, I am no OS expert. I made the jump to RedHat twice, once at v7.3 and once again at v9. I sort of liked v9, but when RedHat cut the project to run their biz like Microsoft, I dumped it. 2 months ago I installed SuSE 9.3, and loved it. First off, MOST Windows users don't install their own OS. If they did, they would find SuSE easier, especially since it is plug-n-play now, and all apps you need are included. I installed on a notebook that I couldn't find "tried and tested" info on anywhere. It is a Sony Vaio PCG-K17. Installation went flawless. I picked the apps I wanted, and YaST did everything. Then, I plugged in a USB mouse, keyboard, and a firewire harddisk. All were accurately detected, first time, and used internal drivers... no CDs or downloads like MS. Even USB Brother HL-1440 and Epson Stylus Photo R300 printers detected and ran with internal drivers.

Then, last week I bought 10.0, to get the FULL DVD. Upgraded with no issue at all. Everything came up running. I don't use Evolution, so I have no valuable input here. But Kontact works flawlessly.

I added Skype, with USB camera (Logitech Notebook Quickcam Pro)... and again flawless.

Then, I upgraded Xine to play DVDs, MP3s, and even MS videos. All is working well.

You don't even need to know how to handle zip files, like you do in Windows to do some installs. The RPMs will install direct from Konqueror.

Replace the Windows desktop... any day with SuSE anyway.

Hope this helps our cause for those on the edge.

Marc

KimVette 10-26-2005 06:01 PM

Well I think this weekend I am going to do another clean install of SuSE 10. I just want to rule out stupid details I may have overlooked because I'm running into other issues I never encountered on SuSE 9.3 (or any other distro either for that matter).

J.W. 10-26-2005 11:48 PM

This weekend I may also be installing SuSE v10 on an experimental box just to see how it goes. Kim if you have additional comments about xine issues (or lack thereof) please post any comments. I'll likewise post back if/when I finish it

supwiddiss 10-27-2005 07:25 AM

Could you try this if you do?
 
J.W.

If you do the install would you check to see if Java works in any of the browsers when you get a connection to the net? Please? And if not, and when you do, could you reveal the steps you performed to get it working?

P4 2.4ghz , 512meg ram, MSI VIA based board, Nvidia GeForce2 MX/MX 400, 80 gig, 2 X 60 gig, Plextor RW, Linksys WMP54GS wireless.

Alan

RedShirt 10-27-2005 08:10 AM

If you used the OpenSuSE install, java will not work. This is because it is not installed. If you chose another version, like the eval, it will only be installed if you selected the java installer package. Either way, you can install it now by following The Jem Report which shows you how to install java, pdf viewers, flash, and shows you how to fix all your multimedia to view/play every type out there from quicktime, to divx, including mp3.

MarcRJacobs 10-27-2005 04:19 PM

I got DVDs working fine off the SuSE 10 install by doing the following installs on top of SuSE:
1. libxine1-1.1.0cvs-051002.i686
2. xine-ui-0.99.4-0.pm.1.i586.rpm
3. w32codec-0.52-1.i386.rpm
4. libdvdcss-1.2.8-2.network.i386.rpm
Make sure to install them in this order though.

fragos 10-27-2005 04:35 PM

libdvdcss2-1.2.9-1.i386 is available.
w32codec-all-20050412-0.pm.0.i586 is also available.

I keep up to date with the latest in DVD on http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/xine/ and it has served me well.

MarcRJacobs 10-27-2005 05:00 PM

Great, thanks for the update.

J.W. 10-28-2005 12:37 AM

Re: Could you try this if you do?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by supwiddiss
If you do the install would you check to see if Java works in any of the browsers when you get a connection to the net? Please? And if not, and when you do, could you reveal the steps you performed to get it working?
According to the SuSE package listing java is included. I don't know if the GF is going to be cool with me spending a couple of hours on the PC when she wants to go up to SF to do shopping, but if I can get the time to check out SuSE v10.0 I will post back

fragos 10-28-2005 12:57 PM

A little help for JW

SuSE 10.0 retail DVD has both java 1.4.2 and 1.5.0 on it. I have both installed on my system.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 AM.