Solaris / OpenSolaris This forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
04-09-2004, 12:56 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Rep:
|
SUN Solaris vs Linux
Hi, Guys!
I have a simple question. I have a binary program compiled for SUN5 Solaris. I cannot run this binary in a linux machine. I tried, but it was impossible. So... Is Linux incompatible with Solaris? Do you think I get to run this software in a machine with SUN9 Solaris?
Regards,
Jose Alexandre
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 12:58 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149
|
Well, the files structures are different from one another and the Solaris binary most likely was only programmed to work on Solaris. Have you attempted to look for an alternative to the binary for Linux?
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 01:06 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: England
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.04
Posts: 631
Rep:
|
Given that a binary that works on one version of one linux distro often won't work on a different version of the same distro or a different contemporary distro , I think the odds of a binary working on Solaris and Linux which are totally different OSs is slim to say the least.
With different OSs, you have three levels of compatibility. The most common is none at all : you can't even compile the same code on different servers without tweaking it. Some OSs have source compatability (e.g. AIX 5 and Linux) where in most cases you can take source code written for Linux and compile it to run on AIX without amendment; as long as you follow certain rules and don't do anything too wacky. Having the same compiled binary running OK on different OSs is the third and, as I say, is uncommon to say the least.
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 01:08 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by trickykid
Well, the files structures are different from one another and the Solaris binary most likely was only programmed to work on Solaris. Have you attempted to look for an alternative to the binary for Linux?
|
Hi, trickykid!
This is a very specific and very old software. I only got a binary done in 1997. There is not an alternative to the binary for Linux. : - (
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 01:16 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hello, iainr!
I will look for a Solaris machine. But... I won't find a SUN5 Solaris. Cannot the binary run in a SUN9 Solaris machine?
Regards,
Jose Alexandre
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 02:45 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149
|
Quote:
Originally posted by josealexandre
Hello, iainr!
I will look for a Solaris machine. But... I won't find a SUN5 Solaris. Cannot the binary run in a SUN9 Solaris machine?
Regards,
Jose Alexandre
|
Most likely I'm sure the filesystems and library's have changed, etc. You'd probably have to install all the dependencies on the Sun5 on the Solaris 9 machine in order for the binary to work.
PS, I'm moving this to our Solaris forum where it seems more suitable.
|
|
|
04-09-2004, 06:19 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,791
|
Sorry guys but there's no such beast like SUN5 Solaris vs SUN9 Solaris, perhaps Solaris 2.5 vs Solaris 9 is what you're talking about.
Anyway, put your binary on a Solaris machine (any kind) and type:
$ file yourBinary
That will give you a clue about it
Last edited by jlliagre; 04-09-2004 at 06:21 PM.
|
|
|
04-12-2004, 02:54 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
hrm...
Solaris would most-likely be on a SPARC machine right? If your linux machine x86, that might also be another factor to consider.
|
|
|
04-12-2004, 07:05 AM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,791
|
Yes, just a reason why I asked for the "file" command output actually ...
|
|
|
04-12-2004, 07:13 AM
|
#10
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jlliagre
Yes, just a reason why I asked for the "file" command output actually ...
|
OK. Now, I understand.
The output to "$ file binary" command is:
FMatrix: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, SPARC, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, stripped
But... What does that mean? Cannot I run this binary one in a PC machine?
Regards,
Jose Alexandre
|
|
|
04-12-2004, 08:39 AM
|
#11
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,791
|
Bad news for you, but there's no way to run it on an Intel, the first reason being you'll need a SPARC and Sun H/W emulator/simulator, and there are not I'm aware of.
SPARC is an open standard RISC processors architecture, usually big endian, while PCs run a proprietary little endian CISC architecture, the instruction sets are completely differents and the data will be reversed.
If you happen to find the source code of your program, it would probably compile easily on a intel solaris platform though, perhaps just endianness issues.
Btw, the opposite, running intel solaris binaries on sparc solaris, is probably achievable by the means of bochs, a portable x86 emulator.
Last edited by jlliagre; 04-12-2004 at 01:17 PM.
|
|
|
04-12-2004, 09:53 AM
|
#12
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 22
Original Poster
Rep:
|
OK, jlliagre! Thank you very much.
|
|
|
04-25-2004, 01:56 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 21
Rep:
|
Hi jlliagre
Could give me yr email address.
Best Regards
Yuvaraj.K
email : yuva_mca@yahoo.com
|
|
|
04-25-2004, 09:44 AM
|
#14
|
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,791
|
yuva_mca,
there's a small icon labeled "email" just in the bottom of each message pane, why not using it ?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|