Solaris / OpenSolarisThis forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have 2 Sun Fire V210/V240, Netra 240 server (let's name them ServerA and ServerB) with same configurations and running SunOne directory server application.
Both server are behind load balancer, but when I analyzed both these server for their cpu utilizations for whole month (using tool HP-OVPM), it shows high utilization in ServerA compare to ServerB.
I checked H/W configuration (using prtdiag -v) on both server and everything was same except Memory Configurations. Here's that part of output:-
There's not enough info to answer/troubleshoot your (possible) problem.
- what else besides a directory server is running on (one of) these servers?,
- how is load-balancing set up (round-robin/weighted/etc ?),
- how is SunOne directory server set up (master-master/master-slave, read-write for both or read only for the slave?),
- hardware differences,
- etc.
This might not be a problem at all. If both boxes perform nicely seen from the users/applications then the difference in CPU utilization between the 2 isn't an issue.
Thanks @druuna.
- There's nothing except directory server application on these servers.
- Load balancing is F5, and both servers are behind F5 (I am not much sure about different set ups, but many other servers groups are behind F5 and their cpu utilization is similar if I compare for whole month, I mean if I look any other group of two servers that are behind F5 then their cpu utilization is quite similar i.e. two parallel graphs)
- Both are read-read instances.
- No difference in H/W architecture.
Last edited by shivaa; 01-13-2013 at 07:02 AM.
Reason: Typo
Problem solved. Actually some apache https processes were there in server B, which was causing high load. So after killing/stopping the same, pb solved.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.