Solaris / OpenSolarisThis forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a ce (quad giga swift card) and an eri interface. I set them up using the ifconfig command (plumb and up). I get the correct info when I do ifconfig -a. Say I activate the eri0, ce0, and ce3 ports.
My problem is: I can connect rempotely to the Server only via one port!!!!!
For example when all three interfaces are up I can only connect with one...if I unplumb 2 and leave only one..then I can connect through this one...why is this happenind?!? any idea?
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=1000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 8232 index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
ce0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2
inet 129.192.128.150 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 129.192.128.191
ether 0:3:ba:b2:f0:78
ce3: flags=1000803<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3
inet 129.192.128.152 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 129.192.128.191
ether 0:3:ba:b2:f0:7b
eri0: flags=1000803<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 4
inet 129.192.128.153 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 129.192.128.191
ether 0:3:ba:cd:8:a1
2) I cannot telnet using the other 2 ports...I mean.if ce0 is there I can onlyuse ce0...if I remove ce0 then I can nly use ce3..if I remove ce3 also and keep only eri0 I can connect using eri0..
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Ubuntu/WSL
Posts: 9,788
Rep:
I definitely do not agree.
It is obviously possible to have many interfaces on the same network, and even recommended when high availability is needed.
As you can see, this interface is missing the flag "RUNNING".
This means that not all required resources are available.
What does `dmesg`say?
I assume it is a driver problem.
What does `modinfo | grep CE`say?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.