LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris
User Name
Password
Solaris / OpenSolaris This forum is for the discussion of Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, and illumos.
General Sun, SunOS and Sparc related questions also go here. Any Solaris fork or distribution is welcome.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2012, 05:48 PM   #1
barnac1e
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA (birthplace of Slackware, ironically)
Distribution: openSUSE 42.2 LEAP- KDE
Posts: 241
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 9
Question HELP: Interesting problem involving DOS, Sun Mircrosystems, Windows...


I recently came across what I consider to be a classic in a thrift store: a Sun Microsystems SSL Performance Plus computer...and for $5. I made sure it could boot and got it. Then by luck, I found both a serial mouse for it and an AT-to-PS/2 adapter for the keyboard. Sadly after that, I got home hoping for its original image to boot but got Windows 3.1 instead. So my problem is I need to tell this systems BIOS to boot first from Cd-Rom so I can put a Unix Live OS in and play away. But none of the Fuction keys get me in so I can only assume DOS is the only way. This is frustrating because I don't know DOS and don't want to. But can anyone here suggest a way with a CD ROM or a 3.5 floppy to get Unix on here? Or by some miracle if anyone knows DOS commands of old, a quick set of commands to run would be excellent. I can cd to the D: drive or even use the ugly Windows interface to see the CD's files but I don't know what file to click to get the Live Cd booting. And that was a Puppy Linux cd I loaded. Any ideas?
 
Old 02-05-2012, 07:12 PM   #2
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnac1e View Post
Sun Microsystems SSL Performance Plus computer
What is that ?
 
Old 02-05-2012, 07:15 PM   #3
barnac1e
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA (birthplace of Slackware, ironically)
Distribution: openSUSE 42.2 LEAP- KDE
Posts: 241

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 9
Red face

What is what?
 
Old 02-06-2012, 03:08 AM   #4
barnac1e
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA (birthplace of Slackware, ironically)
Distribution: openSUSE 42.2 LEAP- KDE
Posts: 241

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 9
Does anyone post in here? Or is Oracle still too proprietary like Sun was, lol
 
Old 02-06-2012, 04:27 AM   #5
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnac1e View Post
What is what?
What is a "Sun Microsystems SSL Performance Plus computer" ?
 
Old 02-06-2012, 04:52 AM   #6
barnac1e
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA (birthplace of Slackware, ironically)
Distribution: openSUSE 42.2 LEAP- KDE
Posts: 241

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 9
Oh. I am guessing it is pretty much, one of the earliest predecessors to the Solaris OS you are running. Sun Microsystems was bought out by Oracle but through an agreement for Sun Developers to stay on at Oracle, Oracle branded Sun OS as Solaris and designated Solaris to be the continuation. But this SSL Performance plus is a really old, like mid to late 1980s model of computer Sun made. My guess is its function was primarily a middle computer that implemented SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) with a performance enhanced processor. SSL is basically what https is today. How or why it has Windows on it I do not know but Im sure it will run Unix fine and maybe even solaris, if I can get into the bootloader.

Sorry for not understanding your initial inquiry.
 
Old 02-06-2012, 08:35 AM   #7
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnac1e View Post
Oh. I am guessing it is pretty much, one of the earliest predecessors to the Solaris OS you are running.
Are you talking about a computer or an operating system ?
Quote:
Sun Microsystems was bought out by Oracle but through an agreement for Sun Developers to stay on at Oracle, Oracle branded Sun OS as Solaris and designated Solaris to be the continuation.
This is quite incorrect. SunOS was rebranded Solaris about twenty years before Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems.
Quote:
But this SSL Performance plus is a really old, like mid to late 1980s model of computer Sun made. My guess is its function was primarily a middle computer that implemented SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) with a performance enhanced processor. SSL is basically what https is today. How or why it has Windows on it I do not know but Im sure it will run Unix fine and maybe even solaris, if I can get into the bootloader.
There used to be a line of product that was named SSxx, like SS5, SS10, SS20 but they were SPARC based so they couldn't run Windows. Later, UltraSPARC workstations were supporting a PCI card containing an x86 and a BIOS, named SunPCI. Is this what you are referring to ?
 
Old 02-06-2012, 11:14 AM   #8
barnac1e
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA (birthplace of Slackware, ironically)
Distribution: openSUSE 42.2 LEAP- KDE
Posts: 241

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 9
Not to get in a debate but most of what you said is correct, however it appears Sun had both SunOs and Solaris systems until 2001, and that was when they dropped SunOS for just the Solaris line so we were half right each. This is all according to th Wiki article of Sun Micro., under the history section.

Now, here are a couple of photos of what I got as well as a shot or two of the insignia.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...546225526.jpg/

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...546297107.jpg/

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...546481143.jpg/

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...546364831.jpg/

So Im thinking its a Sun MS for sure but wont know a model # till I crack it open.

Anyway I need dos off it.

Last edited by barnac1e; 02-06-2012 at 11:25 AM. Reason: typo
 
Old 02-06-2012, 03:45 PM   #9
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnac1e View Post
however it appears Sun had both SunOs and Solaris systems until 2001, and that was when they dropped SunOS for just the Solaris line
To clarify, the SunOS brand was never dropped. Until SunOS 4.x (BSD based), the operating system was named just like that. Starting with the release of the first SunOS 5.x version(SVR4.0 based), the Operation System marketing name changed to Solaris, and this included latest SunOS4 based releases.

SunOS still exists but is now mostly used to identify the kernel version. Latest Solaris release is Solaris 11, its kernel is SunOS 5.11.
Oracle obviously didn't rebrand SunOS as Solaris, however, just like every Oracle software, the official name is now prefixed by Oracle so the latest version is really Oracle Solaris 11.

Quote:
Now, here are a couple of photos of what I got as well as a shot or two of the insignia.

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...546225526.jpg/
So Im thinking its a Sun MS for sure but wont know a model # till I crack it open.

Anyway I need dos off it.
Interesting. However, despite the similar typeface, I'm afraid this box has absolutely nothing to do with Sun Microsystems. SSL != Sun
 
Old 02-06-2012, 03:52 PM   #10
barnac1e
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA (birthplace of Slackware, ironically)
Distribution: openSUSE 42.2 LEAP- KDE
Posts: 241

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 9
I am totally confused now. I will try and crack it open and find a model number on something. Again for only $5 I dont want to stir up dust.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An interesting challenge involving diskless booting a Linux PC Caldus Linux - Server 1 05-20-2010 02:11 PM
Interesting windows unknown publisher problem michaelk General 3 03-06-2010 06:30 AM
Interesting Problem with Fluxbox and missing windows muscap Linux - Software 0 01-19-2005 01:53 AM
This looks interesting, spoofed IGMP report DoS vulnerability neo77777 Linux - Security 1 06-21-2002 07:13 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Other *NIX Forums > Solaris / OpenSolaris

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration