LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > slarm64
User Name
Password
slarm64 This forum is for the discussion of slarm64.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2023, 02:25 AM   #31
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,487
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992
Arrow


Quote:
Originally Posted by sndwvs View Post
Code:
  LD [M]  drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/8192eu.o
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:516: drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:516: drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1921: drivers] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Again for legacy build.
This up is a snip from the build log. Nothing unusual elsewhere so i won't upload the 500+ kb from a clean & compile process.

Last edited by SCerovec; 06-18-2023 at 02:27 AM.
 
Old 06-18-2023, 06:57 AM   #32
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,936

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCerovec View Post
Code:
  LD [M]  drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/8192eu.o
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:516: drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:516: drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1921: drivers] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Again for legacy build.
This up is a snip from the build log. Nothing unusual elsewhere so i won't upload the 500+ kb from a clean & compile process.
fixed
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-18-2023, 07:36 AM   #33
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,487
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992
Thanks.

You are so quick!

No luck for the -next build yet?
 
Old 06-18-2023, 12:17 PM   #34
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,936

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCerovec View Post
No luck for the -next build yet?
update kernel 6.3.7 -> 6.4.0-rc6
 
Old 06-19-2023, 02:32 AM   #35
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,487
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992
Arrow

The kernel 6.4.0-rc8 is out

And here one more error log:
Quote:
|----------- delimiter ----------- "added" "configuration file build-packages.conf" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "added" "configuration file rock_5.conf" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "added" "configuration file rk3588.conf" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "start" "build slarm64 ARCH aarch64 images: core" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "clear" "boot tools" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "compiling" "u-boot-tools-rockchip 2017.09" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "compiling" "arm-trusted-firmware master:tag:v2.9" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "compiling" "u-boot-rk3588 2017.09" -----------|
|----------- delimiter ----------- "compiler" "gcc 13.1.0" -----------|
CLEAN dts/../arch/arm/dts
CLEAN dts
CLEAN examples/standalone
CLEAN tools
CLEAN tools/lib tools/common
CLEAN spl/arch spl/board spl/cmd spl/common spl/disk spl/drivers spl/dts spl/env spl/fs spl/lib spl/u-boot-spl spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin spl/u-boot-spl.dtb spl/u-boot-spl.lds spl/u-boot-spl.map spl/u-boot-spl.sym spl/u-boot.cfg tpl/arch tpl/board tpl/common tpl/disk tpl/drivers tpl/dts tpl/fs tpl/u-boot-spl.lds tpl/u-boot-tpl tpl/u-boot-tpl-nodtb.bin tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin tpl/u-boot-tpl.map tpl/u-boot-tpl.sym tpl/u-boot.cfg
CLEAN u-boot u-boot-dtb.bin u-boot-dtb.img u-boot-nodtb.bin u-boot.bin u-boot.cfg u-boot.cfg.configs u-boot.dtb u-boot.img u-boot.itb u-boot.its u-boot.lds u-boot.map u-boot.srec u-boot.sym System.map bl31_0x00040000.bin bl31_0x000f0000.bin bl31_0xff100000.bin u-boot-dtb.bin u-boot-nodtb.bin u-boot.bin idbloader.img u-boot-dtb.img u-boot.img
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
[snip]
CC [M] drivers/media/usb/gspca/m5602/m5602_ov7660.o
In file included from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from ./include/linux/kernel.h:17,
from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:10,
from ./include/linux/smp.h:13,
from ./include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
from ./include/linux/mutex.h:17,
from ./include/linux/kernfs.h:11,
from ./include/linux/sysfs.h:16,
from ./include/linux/kobject.h:20,
from ./include/linux/cdev.h:5,
from drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622/unisocwcn/platform/wcn_log.c:1:
drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622/unisocwcn/platform/wcn_log.c: In function ‘log_cdev_init’:
./include/linux/export.h:29:21: error: passing argument 1 of ‘class_create’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
29 | #define THIS_MODULE ((struct module *)0)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| struct module *
drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622/unisocwcn/platform/wcn_log.c:263:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘THIS_MODULE’
263 | wcnlog_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "slog_wcn");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/device.h:31,
from ./include/linux/cdev.h:8:
./include/linux/device/class.h:230:54: note: expected ‘const char *’ but argument is of type ‘struct module *’
230 | struct class * __must_check class_create(const char *name);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622/unisocwcn/platform/wcn_log.c:263:24: error: too many arguments to function ‘class_create’
263 | wcnlog_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "slog_wcn");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/device/class.h:230:29: note: declared here
230 | struct class * __must_check class_create(const char *name);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[6]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:252: drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622/unisocwcn/platform/wcn_log.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622/unisocwcn] Error 2
make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/net/wireless/uwe5622] Error 2
make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[snip]
LD [M] drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/8192eu.o
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/net/wireless] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:494: drivers/net] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
[snip]
And lots of warnings like:
Code:
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723be/led.o
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/core/rtw_ap.c: In function ‘rtw_ap_update_chbw_by_ifbmp’:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/core/rtw_ap.c:4385:42: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘padapters’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
 4385 |                 if (!(ifbmp & BIT(i)) || !dvobj->padapters)
      |                                          ^
and
Code:
  LD [M]  drivers/staging/vt6656/vt6656_stage.o
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/hal/hal_hci/hal_usb.c: In function ‘usb_init_recv_priv’:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/hal/hal_hci/hal_usb.c:28:22: warning: cast between incompatible function types from ‘void (*)(void *)’ to ‘void (*)(long unsigned int)’ [-Wcast-function-type]
   28 |                      (void(*)(unsigned long))usb_recv_tasklet,
      |                      ^
and
Code:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/hal/phydm/phydm_api.c: In function ‘phydm_nbi_debug’:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/hal/phydm/phydm_api.c:1656:21: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the pointer operand in ‘input + (sizetype)((long unsigned int)((int)i + 1) * 16)’ must not be NULL [-Waddress]
 1656 |                 if (input[i + 1]) {
      |                     ^~~~~
ocurring in several places.
the buildlog is bigger than 512k...
Attached Files
File Type: txt build.log.gz.txt (92.8 KB, 5 views)
 
Old 06-21-2023, 12:15 AM   #36
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,936

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCerovec View Post
The kernel 6.4.0-rc8 is out

And here one more error log:


And lots of warnings like:
Code:
  CC [M]  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723be/led.o
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/core/rtw_ap.c: In function ‘rtw_ap_update_chbw_by_ifbmp’:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/core/rtw_ap.c:4385:42: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the address of ‘padapters’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
 4385 |                 if (!(ifbmp & BIT(i)) || !dvobj->padapters)
      |                                          ^
and
Code:
  LD [M]  drivers/staging/vt6656/vt6656_stage.o
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/hal/hal_hci/hal_usb.c: In function ‘usb_init_recv_priv’:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8192eu/hal/hal_hci/hal_usb.c:28:22: warning: cast between incompatible function types from ‘void (*)(void *)’ to ‘void (*)(long unsigned int)’ [-Wcast-function-type]
   28 |                      (void(*)(unsigned long))usb_recv_tasklet,
      |                      ^
and
Code:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/hal/phydm/phydm_api.c: In function ‘phydm_nbi_debug’:
drivers/net/wireless/rtl8189fs/hal/phydm/phydm_api.c:1656:21: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the pointer operand in ‘input + (sizetype)((long unsigned int)((int)i + 1) * 16)’ must not be NULL [-Waddress]
 1656 |                 if (input[i + 1]) {
      |                     ^~~~~
ocurring in several places.
the buildlog is bigger than 512k...
fixed
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-19-2023, 01:28 PM   #40
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,553

Rep: Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384
I'm considering one of these. What's GPU support like? Are there decent Mesa Drivers?
 
Old 10-19-2023, 02:55 PM   #41
sndwvs
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,936

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
I'm considering one of these. What's GPU support like? Are there decent Mesa Drivers?
On the legacy kernel everything was fine, now Xorg is not initialized glamor, however, the numbness does not interfere with watching 4k video
 
Old 10-20-2023, 04:08 AM   #42
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,487
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
I'm considering one of these. What's GPU support like? Are there decent Mesa Drivers?
Last time i asked sndwvs he had no working hardware so most of the images were untested.

I have the hardware - and it is fast, office PC kind of fast, not just Android fast.

The only kernel i could make work was the 5.10.110 one patched with OEM patches.

Most of the packaged kernels here are not tested, the 3588S are, but the 3588 seem not to be, i tested few and they failed to run or build or both.

I have my device run that initially working kernel ripped from the 3588S image and an Slackware-aarch64-current system working on my device.

I am yet to go about compiling and installing a mainstream kernel on the device yet - the 6.5.6 made it thru with building (without any patches), but i can't get around to sit down and make it boot too.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-20-2023, 04:30 AM   #43
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,553

Rep: Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384
Thanks very much for the reply. I feel cured from considering that particular SBC!
I take it the OEM doesn't provide a kernel source, or patches?

Is the Orange Pi any better, do you know?

Either way, you've given me a new 'gotchya' to watch out for.

EDIT: Just comparing the Orange Pi and the Rock Pi, the Orange Pi seems to have better software support. They even have Arch.

Last edited by business_kid; 10-20-2023 at 05:31 AM.
 
Old 10-22-2023, 02:36 AM   #44
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,487
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992Reputation: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
Thanks very much for the reply. I feel cured from considering that particular SBC!
I take it the OEM doesn't provide a kernel source, or patches?

Is the Orange Pi any better, do you know?

Either way, you've given me a new 'gotchya' to watch out for.

EDIT: Just comparing the Orange Pi and the Rock Pi, the Orange Pi seems to have better software support. They even have Arch.
Oh, the OEM goes out of their way, but only for particular distributions, i think Armbian was included but i haven't looked in a while.

The Orange Pi, while admittedly having got more traction with the (weaker) Orange 5 (3588S) is not as attractive to me as either:
  1. Friendly Elec Nano PC T6 (fully spec 3588 + proper metal case)
  2. Orange Pi 5 plus (full spec 3588)

Both are on par with this Rock 5, but both have normal sized HDMI for both outputs and one input (rock has one on USB type-C OTG jack, good luck populating that), but the Nano PC T6 leads with how cheap the CNC case is plus it uses the common 5.5 mm barrel jack - KISS applies (and wins hands down) here.

Orange Pi got some lead with greater user base in the more vocal part of the linux community - but in the long run it might prove Friendly Elec is the winner -a properly done metal case will take you further than half-arssed distribution image let in neglect after the stellar release - Orange Pi's custom so far i could tell...

Did I mention the Banana Pi's alluring M2S model yet?

On top of that Friendly Elec seem to have an OEM run web store quite competitive to Aliexpress' pricing and shipping.
 
Old 10-22-2023, 05:40 AM   #45
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,553

Rep: Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384Reputation: 2384
Thanks for laying things out so clearly. I have no local suppliers for Orange or Rock. But the fact that sndwvs has Orange Pi 5s running points me there, if the Rock Pi 5 images are untested. What are the graphics like? I can see CONFIG_MALI_DRM_DISPLAY in the kernel, but can't spot much in Mesa.

After my RazPi 4 experience, I wanted a decent non-proprietary graphics setup before I'd even consider a purchase. I'll wait for a decent driver source code before considering the Pi 5. I'd also want to hear back very good things on computing power or compile times. As an ex-hardware guy, I know internal tweaks can do a lot of unseen good only if the first design was terrible.

The RK3588 boards are priced close to €200. For a bit more, I'm into the bottom end x86_64 stuff. The spec I wanted was the RK3588+ board in a metal case with a bootable nvme and no fan. In Europe, CE requirements mean that any metal is grounded, so the metal case acts as a Faraday shield on internal wifi aerials. I'm trusting the sdcard has boot priority? Otherwise, if the M2 goes.....

EDIT: I'll check out the Banana M2S & Friendly Elec too.

Last edited by business_kid; 10-22-2023 at 05:43 AM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
radxa team, rk3588, rockchip, slackware, slarm64


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Rock PI 4 RK3399 (aarch64) sndwvs Slackware - ARM 100 12-07-2021 09:25 AM
[SOLVED] Rock Pi E RK3328 (aarch64) sndwvs Slackware - ARM 10 12-07-2021 09:23 AM
[SOLVED] Rock Pi S RK3308 (aarch64) sndwvs Slackware - ARM 22 12-07-2021 09:22 AM
[SOLVED] ROCK 3 RK3568 (slarm64, aarch64) sndwvs Slackware - ARM 7 12-07-2021 09:16 AM
Rock Linux -- does it rock ?? rolando Linux - Distributions 2 10-10-2004 01:52 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > slarm64

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration