LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware > Slackware - Installation
User Name
Password
Slackware - Installation This forum is for the discussion of installation issues with Slackware.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2022, 09:23 AM   #1
crew1908
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2022
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Ubuntu 18
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Install Slack into a mobo with Via C3 Samuel 2 processor. Possible?


Hello!

I have this:

-Mother S630MP with VIA C3 Samuel 2 processor (non PAE, no cmov and no cx8). BIOS:1.00
-RAM: 1GB
-Disk: 70GB (35Gb with XP and it works good)
-Video: no video card.
-Internet: USB 802.11 draft-n wireless (Debian 8 recognized it as RT2780.bin)
-Why? Desktop, a very basic PC to read news, write a doc and nothing more.

I want to know: Is it possible to install Slackware 15 for this?
I looked for info but I couldn't found a complete answer. I know, I'm a newbie using old technology. However I took it as a challenge.

What did I do?
I tried to install Slackware 15 (NOT 64 bits) and selected "huge.s".
What happened?
When the installation was at the packages screen, well, It took 12 hours to complete A package. So, one hour later I decided -I was sad, very sad- to shutdown poweroff.

Now I'm installing Debian 8, but I feel that I haven't done enough for installing Slack. It's the grandpa of the distros.

Could you help me? In this case...is it possible to install or not?

If it's possible...what can I do to do a better install?
If it's not possible...what distro do you recommend? (I'm traying with Debian 8 but I'm not sure because during the installation each move of mouse take 10 secs)

Thanks for reading it!

(Yeeeessss I posted! I couldn't yesterday. It's a good step)

Last edited by crew1908; 05-05-2022 at 04:14 PM. Reason: add information
 
Old 05-04-2022, 04:00 AM   #2
mrmazda
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 5,807
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066
Quote:
Originally Posted by crew1908 View Post
I'm traying with Debian 8 but I'm not sure because during the installation each move of mouse take 10 secs)
You don't mention the GPU responsible for this, or the WM or DE. I put Debian 8 on a K6/2-550 with 256M RAM and Trident CyberBlade/i7 IGP a few weeks ago. GUI basics didn't seem to be as slow as you suggest, but I was using TDE, which is quite light for a DE. I tried an upgrade to Debian 9, but didn't get far before missing CPU instructions brought it to a halt. I'm thinking you need to find something known to run on an Athlon XP at least, something I put on my todo list 2 days ago. Non-support of CPUs lacking SSE2 is growing, which likely means trouble with stale info in your quest.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-04-2022, 09:25 AM   #3
crew1908
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2022
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Ubuntu 18
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmazda View Post
You don't mention the GPU responsible for this, or the WM or DE.I'm thinking you need to find something known to run on an Athlon XP at least, something I put on my todo list 2 days ago. Non-support of CPUs lacking SSE2 is growing, which likely means trouble with stale info in your quest.
Thanks for you answer! I'll post the information about the GPU later. I don't know about WM or DE, because the problem is during the installation, but I'm traying to install xfce. I read that is the better option for this case.

Ok...options. I'm going to make a list with the problems that I found for each one.



Slackware: very slow intallation at the packages screen.
Debian 8: very, very slow installation
Alpine: start but need internet conection. I left it for later.
AntiX: I don't like this option. It'll be the last
Slitaz:next if we can do nothing with Slackware

Last edited by crew1908; 05-04-2022 at 09:28 AM.
 
Old 05-04-2022, 10:51 AM   #4
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
In 2001, you'd be probably still on USB-1.0, which had specs of 100mA max current, 1MB/S.There were 2 drivers,uhci.o (yes, modules were '.o' and not '.ko' back then) or ohci.o. uhci.o was for intel & via,IIRC. USB-2.0 did more, but back then it was still under 10MB/S if memory serves

They keep saying "Socket 370" in the C3 datasheet. Socket 370 IIRC was the Celeron socket so this is quite probably a 32bit cpu running on a 16 bit data bus. It does MMX instructions so it's '586 all right. I'd go for slackware-11.0 (kernel-2.4.21) or 12.0 (kernel2.6.x).

If you have a decent 1.44MB disk, I believe tomsrtbt is still up there. It reformats your 1.44MB floppy as 1.82MB and installs a busybox OS on it http://www.toms.net/rb. Unusual slowness might be disk errors. I could download an OS faster on serial port modem (max 56k baud) faster than you're installing it. Now you have to unpack the archives to install, but that slow speed is a death knell. Maybe somebody's mucked with the multiplier in the BIOS and the cpu is in revolt.

If you're not restoring it in a museum this btw is a colossal waste of time.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-04-2022, 11:50 AM   #5
crew1908
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2022
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Ubuntu 18
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
In 2001, you'd be probably still on USB-1.0, which had specs of 100mA max current, 1MB/S.There were 2 drivers,uhci.o (yes, modules were '.o' and not '.ko' back then) or ohci.o. uhci.o was for intel & via,IIRC. USB-2.0 did more, but back then it was still under 10MB/S if memory serves

They keep saying "Socket 370" in the C3 datasheet. Socket 370 IIRC was the Celeron socket so this is quite probably a 32bit cpu running on a 16 bit data bus. It does MMX instructions so it's '586 all right. I'd go for slackware-11.0 (kernel-2.4.21) or 12.0 (kernel2.6.x).

If you have a decent 1.44MB disk, I believe tomsrtbt is still up there. It reformats your 1.44MB floppy as 1.82MB and installs a busybox OS on it http://www.toms.net/rb. Unusual slowness might be disk errors. I could download an OS faster on serial port modem (max 56k baud) faster than you're installing it. Now you have to unpack the archives to install, but that slow speed is a death knell. Maybe somebody's mucked with the multiplier in the BIOS and the cpu is in revolt.

If you're not restoring it in a museum this btw is a colossal waste of time.
Thanks a lot! I'll probe with Slack 12, I think that the floppy option it's far away for me. Nobody touched this PC, it was bought and abandoned.
I conected the pendrive and used it on Windows XP and it was ok. I'm thinking that the problem could be de disk or maybe the memories.

I'll work on it the next days with the information that both of you gave me,then I'll post again. Promise.
 
Old 05-05-2022, 04:20 PM   #6
crew1908
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2022
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Ubuntu 18
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmazda View Post
You don't mention the GPU responsible for this, or the WM or DE. I put Debian 8 on a K6/2-550 with 256M RAM and Trident CyberBlade/i7 IGP a few weeks ago. GUI basics didn't seem to be as slow as you suggest, but I was using TDE, which is quite light for a DE. I tried an upgrade to Debian 9, but didn't get far before missing CPU instructions brought it to a halt. I'm thinking you need to find something known to run on an Athlon XP at least, something I put on my todo list 2 days ago. Non-support of CPUs lacking SSE2 is growing, which likely means trouble with stale info in your quest.
I've checked and it hasn't video card. It's pure mobo. I've updated first post with mobo's model (I think it doesn't add information, because manuals are impossible)
 
Old 05-05-2022, 08:41 PM   #7
mrmazda
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2016
Location: SE USA
Distribution: openSUSE 24/7; Debian, Knoppix, Mageia, Fedora, others
Posts: 5,807
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066Reputation: 2066
If not a discrete video card, then it must have southbridge or discrete onboard graphics with a 15pin motherboard output, probably SiS or Savage or Trident. So, X might work with an openchrome or savage or sis or trident Xorg (xf86-video-) display driver, and a distro that provides a working version of the appropriate one. If you can get output from lspci -nnk | grep -A3 VGA, or better yet inxi -Gaz that would narrow down which.
 
Old 05-06-2022, 05:27 AM   #8
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
Quote:
Originally Posted by crew1908 View Post
I've checked and it hasn't video card. It's pure mobo. I've updated first post with mobo's model (I think it doesn't add information, because manuals are impossible)
Go hunting on ebay. You'll want a pci card, firmware isn't a problem, and X had/has the drivers.Nearly any name you haven't heard of. Savage, S3, Radeon (did linux drivers before 2001). These are glorified D/A cards, not video as we know them today.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VIA C3 Eden Samuel 2 (ME6000) suitable distro - concluion old_liquid Linux - Hardware 1 04-22-2016 12:34 PM
Samuel from Texas samueltx LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 01-14-2015 06:19 AM
What kernel binary for VIA C3 Samuel 2 CPU hominy Linux - Hardware 3 11-21-2008 01:41 PM
ndiswrapper locks up on VIA Samuel nattu Linux - Wireless Networking 5 09-18-2008 10:12 AM
Which FC for a VIA motherboard with a Samuel 2 CPU? SNAD Fedora - Installation 3 04-30-2006 02:43 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware > Slackware - Installation

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration