Slackware - ARM This forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
11-19-2015, 04:43 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 948
Rep: 
|
Turris Omnia for Slackware ARM?
Hi,
Recently I came across this (Turris Omnia) bit of kit and I'm really considering buying one.
Provided that it has support for mSATA, you could plug some good SSD and don't bother with logs and downloads/shares wearing your main flash too quickly.
What do you think?
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
|
|
|
11-20-2015, 12:43 PM
|
#2
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,661
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by atelszewski
Hi,
Recently I came across this (Turris Omnia) bit of kit and I'm really considering buying one.
Provided that it has support for mSATA, you could plug some good SSD and don't bother with logs and downloads/shares wearing your main flash too quickly.
What do you think?
|
There's a lot of "blah blah" on all of these ARM devices.
The key question in my experience is: Is it entirely supported (drivers for the CPU and the embedded devices in the SoC, usually) in the kernel.org kernel? If not, when will it be?
If the answer is "not at the moment" and "Unknown", move on because you'll have a device that has a short life span: the device works with Linux version x.y.z and that's it. There's only so long you can be stuck on a particular version of the Kernel before you're forced to upgrade, which of course can only be done if there's support in the main line Kernel. I have seen too many projects have their own git tree where the support never gets mainlined.
Once it's supported, it's great :-)
|
|
|
11-20-2015, 12:59 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 948
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Hi,
@drmozes Good points, I'm gonna pay attention to that.
Hell, I'm doing embedded Linux not from yesterday and I didn't think of those. Dumb.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
|
|
|
12-04-2015, 03:55 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Utrecht, NL
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
@atelszewski,
I was also looking at the Turris Omnia router and stumbled upon this thread. Did you find answers to the questions that @drmozes raised ("Is it entirely supported (drivers for the CPU and the embedded devices in the SoC, usually) in the kernel.org kernel? If not, when will it be?").
|
|
|
12-04-2015, 04:09 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 948
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Hi,
Nope, I haven't investigated yet. I'm planning to do so before the campaign ends, but can't promise I'll manage.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
|
|
|
12-11-2015, 08:56 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2013
Location: Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 636
Rep:
|
Well the SOC is a Marvell Armada 385 ... I looked in the newest longterm supported kernel (4.1.14) and could not find support for this soc in the obvious places ... but on more research ( https://www.kernel.org/doc/readme/Do...Marvell-README) it looks like this sock is supported in the mvebu family (shows up if you enable multiple platform selection). But I've no idea how well that is supported.
@drmozes : do you still use sheva plugs ? if so on what kernel version ?
According to the readme above the kirkwood support is in mvebu too, I've not compiled kernel for my dockstar since 2.6.38 but a lot has changed since then. Maybe you happen to have compiled one for your sheva plugs with the new architecture branch mach-mvebu ?
Last edited by louigi600; 12-11-2015 at 09:03 AM.
|
|
|
12-11-2015, 11:01 AM
|
#7
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,661
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by louigi600
According to the readme above the kirkwood support is in mvebu too, I've not compiled kernel for my dockstar since 2.6.38 but a lot has changed since then. Maybe you happen to have compiled one for your sheva plugs with the new architecture branch mach-mvebu ?
|
-current runs on my Kirkwood machines with Linux 4.2.6. It's supported by CONFIG_MACH_KIRKWOOD which is under ARCH_MVEBU. However, these are armv5 machines so are handled by the 'armv5' kernel.
The Armada 385 is an armv7 and I don't have support for it compiled in to the armv7 Kernel, but I'm going to do a kernel update for -current soon so I'll add it into the next build. This will be SoC support, but I don't know what else it may require yet.
It looks like it'll be supported by Debian, so that's always a great sign that it'll actually *work* :-)
Last edited by drmozes; 12-11-2015 at 11:04 AM.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:18 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|