Slackware - ARMThis forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Slackware-14.1 with or without fbturbo : Xorg.bin at 0% cpu usage when idle, fluid.
How can I debug the 20% cpu usage on -current ?
Have you tried strace?
I have swapped out the fbdev package with fbturbo. I contemplated keeping the two packages but since fbturbo lists itself as a drop-in replacement (although that's not quite true since the driver name is different which requires a change to the X11 config) it doesn't really make sense.
Ok, found out.
Xfce display compositor is enabled by default and eat some CPU.
Patch :
sed -i -e "s/use_compositing=true/use_compositing=false" /usr/share/xfwm4/defaults
What hardware are you using to test on? I was going to load up XFCE on my OpenRD client until I discovered that the frame buffer isn't working any more (something new to hack on for a few hours!).
[...]
ldconfig: libraries libnss_nis-2.17.so and libnss_nis-2.21.so in directory /lib have same soname but different type.
ldconfig: libraries libcidn-2.17.so and libcidn-2.21.so in directory /lib have same soname but different type.
[...]
when running ldconfig after upgrading from 14.1 to current on my Raspberry Pi, while I don't see this on my desktop (x86_64) or laptop (x86)? What is the preferred way to get rid of this? Deleting those old .so's? I did upgrade aaa_elflibs first, then glibc-solibs, followed by everything else. I understand this is a harmless but rather annoying message.
[...]
ldconfig: libraries libnss_nis-2.17.so and libnss_nis-2.21.so in directory /lib have same soname but different type.
ldconfig: libraries libcidn-2.17.so and libcidn-2.21.so in directory /lib have same soname but different type.
[...]
when running ldconfig after upgrading from 14.1 to current on my Raspberry Pi, while I don't see this on my desktop (x86_64) or laptop (x86)? What is the preferred way to get rid of this? Deleting those old .so's? I did upgrade aaa_elflibs first, then glibc-solibs, followed by everything else. I understand this is a harmless but rather annoying message.
It's because the libraries for glibc are placed in to a staging directory, lib/incoming which isn't tracked by pkgtools. The only way to clean it up is manually - so yes, delete them: if you've upgraded everything then those libraries from the glibc-2.17 will be superfluous to requirements.
It's because the libraries for glibc are placed in to a staging directory, lib/incoming which isn't tracked by pkgtools. The only way to clean it up is manually - so yes, delete them: if you've upgraded everything then those libraries from the glibc-2.17 will be superfluous to requirements.
Thank you for the explanation, Stuart. I've moved the .so's in question to another location for now and the messages are gone.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.