LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware > Slackware - ARM
User Name
Password
Slackware - ARM This forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2022, 11:59 AM   #16
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39

Updated Chromium-ungoogled 98.0.4758.102 package for Slackware Armv7 this evening.
Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-16-2022, 04:04 AM   #17
drmozes
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,539

Rep: Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309Reputation: 1309
Quote:
Originally Posted by alekow View Post
Code:
QTWEBENGINE_CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--disable-seccomp-filter-sandbox" falkon
The qt5 package for ARM 32bit have that option added to its environment setup script, so this issue should now be fixed.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2022, 08:49 AM   #18
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
If anyone is instrested, Chromium-ungoogled 102.0.5005.115 package for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.
Sorry to say i have not bothered to compile Chromium as i only use Chromium-ungoogled, due to the compile time.
Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
 
Old 06-27-2022, 12:54 AM   #19
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
If anyone is instrested, Chromium 103.0.5060.53 and Chromium-ungoogled 103.0.5060.53 packages for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.

Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-30-2022, 08:26 AM   #20
pm_a_cup_of_tea
Member
 
Registered: May 2021
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minime_2003 View Post
If anyone is instrested, Chromium 103.0.5060.53 and Chromium-ungoogled 103.0.5060.53 packages for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.

Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
I am and thank you for your effort. This is saving me the 46+ hours build time.

Despite Exaga supplying the 64bit kernel for kernel, I found my system to be really slow. The 32 on the other hand just runs so well and I much prefer having the stable release, your browser build just completes it.

Last edited by pm_a_cup_of_tea; 06-30-2022 at 08:30 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-30-2022, 10:26 AM   #21
Exaga
SARPi Maintainer
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: Slackware AArch64
Posts: 1,043

Rep: Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by pm_a_cup_of_tea View Post
Despite Exaga supplying the 64bit kernel for kernel, I found my system to be really slow.
Depending on how you're using the RPi, don't forget you can set the 'gpu_mem=' setting in the config.txt file to allocate the available RAM. I always have mine set at 'gpu_mem=32' because I rarely use the desktop. Gotta say Slackware AArch64 on the RPi4 is pretty damned quick.
 
Old 06-30-2022, 11:46 AM   #22
pm_a_cup_of_tea
Member
 
Registered: May 2021
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exaga View Post
Gotta say Slackware AArch64 on the RPi4 is pretty damned quick.
Thanks for the reply. I setup up the config.txt in my usual manner but I'll reinstall and see. I am sure its either me or my hardware
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-30-2022, 06:25 PM   #23
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by pm_a_cup_of_tea View Post
I am and thank you for your effort. This is saving me the 46+ hours build time.

Despite Exaga supplying the 64bit kernel for kernel, I found my system to be really slow. The 32 on the other hand just runs so well and I much prefer having the stable release, your browser build just completes it.
Some reasons why i will be sticking with Slackare ARM 15.0 (32 bit)
As the RPI 4 i have with 4 GB Ram (512 MB used for GPU) i dont really see any reason to use 64bit even thow the cpu suports ARMv8.
There is as far as i know (What i have read) no Widevine for Aarch64, solution is to use 32bit version from chromiumOS.
So i am guessing one has to have multilib on Aarch64 to be able to run Widevine 32bit in 64bit system? (As i understand, this is the official solution for RPI)
https://github.com/raspberrypi/Raspb...4bit/issues/11
This also means that one has to have a 32bit chromium web browser installed anyway in order to be able to view DRM streams.

So, i will be sticking with Slackware ARM 15.0 as long as i can.
Happy with my setup, the system and programs are stable and reliable after some patches, updates and tweeks =)

Packages that i patched as described on my github, glibc
And upgraded python3 to 3.9.13

Last edited by Minime_2003; 06-30-2022 at 06:51 PM.
 
Old 07-01-2022, 12:20 PM   #24
Exaga
SARPi Maintainer
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: Slackware AArch64
Posts: 1,043

Rep: Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665Reputation: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by pm_a_cup_of_tea View Post
Thanks for the reply. I setup up the config.txt in my usual manner but I'll reinstall and see. I am sure its either me or my hardware
Sure thing. As always, each user will have to do some tinkering and find the most suitable balance for their test-case/usage.

The reason why I say Slackware AArch64 is pretty damned quick, and what I'm basing it on, is the increase in compiling times on the RPi4 [4GB] compared to Slackware ARM 15.0. For example, on the same machine, running Slackware ARM 15.0 it'll build 'google-go-lang_1.17.9' pkg in approx. 35 minutes, and when running Slackware AArch64 the same pkg will build in approx. 25 minutes. I use the same SSD storage drive and have a 8GB /swap partition on both OS.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-14-2022, 02:47 AM   #25
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
If anyone is instrested, Chromium-ungoogled 103.0.5060.114 package for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.
At the moment i have not compiled Chromium 103.0.5060.114, however i might be adding this at some point if i can find the time.
Sorry for that.

Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
 
Old 07-25-2022, 05:44 PM   #26
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
If anyone is instrested, Chromium-ungoogled 103.0.5060.134 package for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.

Edit (220729): Chromium 103.0.5060.134 package for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.

Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime

Last edited by Minime_2003; 07-29-2022 at 04:47 PM.
 
Old 08-07-2022, 10:26 PM   #27
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
If anyone is instrested, Chromium-ungoogled 104.0.5112.79 package for Slackware Armv7 is avalible.

Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
 
Old 08-21-2022, 02:38 PM   #28
Minime_2003
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2021
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 39
Latest Chromium-ungoogled 104.0.5112.101 package for Slackware Armv7 is now avalible for download.

Enjoy

Best regards:
Minime
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-19-2022, 06:34 AM   #29
alekow
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 230

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 75
I am recharging and refreshing my chromeboook now - I think a nice ungoogled chromium will be a good match to my ungoogled asus ;-)
Thanks!
 
Old 09-23-2022, 03:31 PM   #30
pm_a_cup_of_tea
Member
 
Registered: May 2021
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exaga View Post
Sure thing. As always, each user will have to do some tinkering and find the most suitable balance for their test-case/usage.

The reason why I say Slackware AArch64 is pretty damned quick, and what I'm basing it on, is the increase in compiling times on the RPi4 [4GB] compared to Slackware ARM 15.0. For example, on the same machine, running Slackware ARM 15.0 it'll build 'google-go-lang_1.17.9' pkg in approx. 35 minutes, and when running Slackware AArch64 the same pkg will build in approx. 25 minutes. I use the same SSD storage drive and have a 8GB /swap partition on both OS.
It was absolutely my hardware. I purchased a new SSD and that did wonders
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] KDE Plasma is limiting my usable 110GiB HD to 35GiB usable space. Why? LacunaBlue Linux - Newbie 5 05-05-2020 10:49 AM
[SOLVED] KODI Krypton - 17.x MediaPlayer - Optimized for Raspberry Pi1/Pi2/Pi3 on Slackware ARM 14.2 SF & Slackware ARM - current HF abga Slackware - ARM 40 08-28-2018 08:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware > Slackware - ARM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration