LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware > Slackware - ARM
User Name
Password
Slackware - ARM This forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-03-2022, 05:23 AM   #16
Dunc.
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Cumbria UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 30

It just builds on my machine ,no errors, (rpi4 aarch64) but I do have installed gcc-arm-none-eabi-10.3-2021.10-aarch64-1_SBo.tgz. This was built from source overnight. It includes binutils, newlib, newlib-nano, gdb, and gcc-size-libstdcxx. Plain vanilla gcc that is in Slackware does not support all arm Cortex-M architectures.

Dunc.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-03-2022, 07:37 AM   #17
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,208

Rep: Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537
I'm no expert, but I think from 14.2 Slackware Arm just catered for Arm Cortex 7 & above, they're only doing aarch64 now afaict. You'll end up compiling everything you want to run, which is a major PITA.
 
Old 09-03-2022, 01:11 PM   #18
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunc. View Post
It just builds on my machine ,no errors, (rpi4 aarch64) but I do have installed gcc-arm-none-eabi-10.3-2021.10-aarch64-1_SBo.tgz. This was built from source overnight. It includes binutils, newlib, newlib-nano, gdb, and gcc-size-libstdcxx. Plain vanilla gcc that is in Slackware does not support all arm Cortex-M architectures.

Dunc.
i too have the gcc from SBo:
Code:
$ arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-none-eabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/arm-none-eabi/10.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-none-eabi
Configured with: ../gcc-10.2.0/configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --infodir=/usr/info --mandir=/usr/man --disable-install-libiberty --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-linker-build-id --disable-nls --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=isl --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gold --enable-ld=default --enable-lto --enable-plugin --target=arm-none-eabi --with-cpu=cortex-m3 --with-fpu=fpv4-sp-d16 --with-float=softfp --with-mode=thumb --enable-interwork --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib --without-headers --disable-shared --disable-nls --with-as=/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-as --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-ld --program-prefix=arm-none-eabi- --program-suffix= --build=arm-slackware-linux --enable-languages=c --with-newlib --with-headers=/usr/include/newlib/libc/include
Thread model: single
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 10.2.0 (GCC)
FWIW
 
Old 09-05-2022, 04:36 AM   #19
Dunc.
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Cumbria UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 30
The SBo is built with
Code:
 --with-cpu=cortex-m3 \
 --with-fpu=fpv4-sp-d16 \
 --with-float=hard \
This is not the way to do it. rmprofile is the way to go.
Code:
--with-multilib-list=rmprofile
If I check which architectures are supported I get this.
Code:
duncan@rpi-4:~$ arm-none-eabi-gcc --print-multi-lib
.;
arm/v5te/softfp;@marm@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
arm/v5te/hard;@marm@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/nofp;@mthumb@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v7-r+fp.sp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7-r+fp.sp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7-r+fp.sp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7-r+fp.sp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v6-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv6s-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7e-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7e-m+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7e-m+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v7e-m+dp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7e-m+dp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8-m.base/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.base@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v8-m.main/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v8-m.main+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v8-m.main+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8-m.main+dp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v8-m.main+dp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8.1-m.main+mve/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8.1-m.main+mve@mfloat-abi=hard
It has both hard and soft float support.

Dunc.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-06-2022, 08:35 AM   #20
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunc. View Post
The SBo is built with
Code:
 --with-cpu=cortex-m3 \
 --with-fpu=fpv4-sp-d16 \
 --with-float=hard \
This is not the way to do it. rmprofile is the way to go.
Code:
--with-multilib-list=rmprofile
If I check which architectures are supported I get this.
Code:
duncan@rpi-4:~$ arm-none-eabi-gcc --print-multi-lib
.;
arm/v5te/softfp;@marm@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
arm/v5te/hard;@marm@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/nofp;@mthumb@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v7-r+fp.sp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7-r+fp.sp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7-r+fp.sp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7-r+fp.sp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v6-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv6s-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7e-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7e-m+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7e-m+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v7e-m+dp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7e-m+dp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8-m.base/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.base@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v8-m.main/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v8-m.main+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v8-m.main+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8-m.main+dp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v8-m.main+dp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8.1-m.main+mve/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8.1-m.main+mve@mfloat-abi=hard
It has both hard and soft float support.

Dunc.
So if i replace that three lines with that one single i get what i need?

I am running a test as we speak

edit:
FWIW current SBo gives:
Code:
# arm-none-eabi-gcc --print-multi-lib
.;
thumb;@mthumb
arm/autofp/v5te/fpu;@marm@mfpu=auto@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/autofp/v7/fpu;@mthumb@mfpu=auto@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
that seems to be quite in line with what my results were (hard float binary output)

Last edited by SCerovec; 09-06-2022 at 08:38 AM.
 
Old 09-07-2022, 03:42 PM   #21
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Many, many thanks to @Dunc.

arm-none-eabi-gcc --print-multi-lib
Code:
.;
arm/v5te/softfp;@marm@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
arm/v5te/hard;@marm@march=armv5te+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/nofp;@mthumb@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v7-r+fp.sp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7-r+fp.sp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7-r+fp.sp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7-r+fp.sp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v6-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv6s-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7e-m/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v7e-m+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7e-m+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v7e-m+dp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v7e-m+dp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv7e-m+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8-m.base/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.base@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v8-m.main/nofp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main@mfloat-abi=soft
thumb/v8-m.main+fp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v8-m.main+fp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8-m.main+dp/softfp;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=softfp
thumb/v8-m.main+dp/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8-m.main+fp.dp@mfloat-abi=hard
thumb/v8.1-m.main+mve/hard;@mthumb@march=armv8.1-m.main+mve@mfloat-abi=hard
however now:
Code:
$ make
  Creating symbolic link out/board
  Building out/autoconf.h
  Compiling out/src/sched.o
  Compiling out/src/command.o
  Compiling out/src/basecmd.o
  Compiling out/src/debugcmds.o
  Compiling out/src/initial_pins.o
  Compiling out/src/gpiocmds.o
  Compiling out/src/stepper.o
  Compiling out/src/endstop.o
  Compiling out/src/trsync.o
  Compiling out/src/adccmds.o
  Compiling out/src/spicmds.o
  Compiling out/src/thermocouple.o
  Compiling out/src/i2ccmds.o
  Compiling out/src/pwmcmds.o
  Compiling out/src/spi_software.o
  Compiling out/src/sensor_adxl345.o
  Compiling out/src/sensor_angle.o
  Compiling out/src/sensor_mpu9250.o
  Compiling out/src/lcd_st7920.o
  Compiling out/src/lcd_hd44780.o
  Compiling out/src/buttons.o
  Compiling out/src/tmcuart.o
  Compiling out/src/neopixel.o
  Compiling out/src/pulse_counter.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/watchdog.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/gpio.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/clockline.o
  Compiling out/src/generic/crc16_ccitt.o
  Compiling out/src/generic/armcm_boot.o
  Compiling out/src/generic/armcm_irq.o
  Compiling out/src/generic/armcm_reset.o
  Compiling out/src/../lib/stm32f1/system_stm32f1xx.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/stm32f1.o
  Compiling out/src/generic/armcm_timer.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/adc.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/i2c.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/spi.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/usbfs.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/chipid.o
  Compiling out/src/generic/usb_cdc.o
  Compiling out/src/stm32/hard_pwm.o
  Building out/compile_time_request.o
Version: v0.10.0-557-gf7e29b27
  Preprocessing out/src/generic/armcm_link.ld
  Linking out/klipper.elf
/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-ld: cannot find -lg_nano
/usr/bin/arm-none-eabi-ld: cannot find -lc_nano
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [Makefile:72: out/klipper.elf] Error 1
We are getting there!

Anyone, what is g_nano?
 
Old 09-08-2022, 06:14 AM   #22
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,208

Rep: Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCerovec
Anyone, what is g_nano?
Does this help? https://nanopi.io
 
Old 09-08-2022, 06:51 AM   #23
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_kid View Post
Does this help? https://nanopi.io
While i am quite fond of FreindlyElec (as a mater of fact I am a happy user of their Nano PC T4) this does not seem to help .

This nano has something to do with software i think.
 
Old 09-08-2022, 07:17 AM   #24
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
after installing mlocate to my BBB i checked this:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian# locate g_nano

Code:
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/hard/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v6-m/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7-ar/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7-ar/fpv3/hard/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7-ar/fpv3/hard/be/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7-ar/fpv3/softfp/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7-m/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7e-m/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7e-m/fpv4-sp/hard/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7e-m/fpv4-sp/softfp/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7e-m/fpv5/hard/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v7e-m/fpv5/softfp/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v8-m.base/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v8-m.main/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v8-m.main/fpv5/hard/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v8-m.main/fpv5/softfp/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v8-m.main/fpv5-sp/hard/libg_nano.a
/usr/lib/arm-none-eabi/newlib/thumb/v8-m.main/fpv5-sp/softfp/libg_nano.a
so my newlib isn't to spec either?
 
Old 09-08-2022, 07:57 AM   #25
Dunc.
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Cumbria UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 30
nano refers to the version of newlib. The arm toolchain builds newlib twice. It packages one as newlib and the other as nano.
Code:
    $SRCDIR/$NEWLIB_NANO/configure  \
        $NEWLIB_CONFIG_OPTS \
        --target=$TARGET \
        --prefix=$BUILDDIR_NATIVE/target-libs \
        --disable-newlib-supplied-syscalls    \
        --enable-newlib-reent-check-verify    \
        --enable-newlib-reent-small           \
        --enable-newlib-retargetable-locking  \
        --disable-newlib-fvwrite-in-streamio  \
        --disable-newlib-fseek-optimization   \
        --disable-newlib-wide-orient          \
        --enable-newlib-nano-malloc           \
        --disable-newlib-unbuf-stream-opt     \
        --enable-lite-exit                    \
        --enable-newlib-global-atexit         \
        --enable-newlib-nano-formatted-io     \
        --disable-nls
That is the bit in their script that builds the newlib-nano. In my nano.specs file I have -lc_nano and -lg_nano listed. I have been looking at the best way to get you the libraries needed. I think it might be to go down the pre-compiled binary route (I hate the idea of this and I don't really know why). I would extract the archive into a directory in /opt. You would need to add the bin directory to the PATH and the lib directory to ld.so.conf.

Dunc.
 
Old 09-09-2022, 05:31 AM   #26
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunc. View Post
nano refers to the version of newlib. The arm toolchain builds newlib twice. It packages one as newlib and the other as nano.
Code:
    $SRCDIR/$NEWLIB_NANO/configure  \
        $NEWLIB_CONFIG_OPTS \
        --target=$TARGET \
        --prefix=$BUILDDIR_NATIVE/target-libs \
        --disable-newlib-supplied-syscalls    \
        --enable-newlib-reent-check-verify    \
        --enable-newlib-reent-small           \
        --enable-newlib-retargetable-locking  \
        --disable-newlib-fvwrite-in-streamio  \
        --disable-newlib-fseek-optimization   \
        --disable-newlib-wide-orient          \
        --enable-newlib-nano-malloc           \
        --disable-newlib-unbuf-stream-opt     \
        --enable-lite-exit                    \
        --enable-newlib-global-atexit         \
        --enable-newlib-nano-formatted-io     \
        --disable-nls
That is the bit in their script that builds the newlib-nano. In my nano.specs file I have -lc_nano and -lg_nano listed. I have been looking at the best way to get you the libraries needed. I think it might be to go down the pre-compiled binary route (I hate the idea of this and I don't really know why). I would extract the archive into a directory in /opt. You would need to add the bin directory to the PATH and the lib directory to ld.so.conf.

Dunc.
On the same page @Dunc.

I would rather find the needed options for the Slackbuild than taint the system.

Thanks for the insight, tho, will report back as i go about it
 
Old 09-09-2022, 12:18 PM   #27
Dunc.
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Cumbria UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 30
The added options in the arm build are
Code:
   --enable-newlib-nano-formatted-io     \
     --enable-newlib-global-atexit         \
       --enable-lite-exit                    \
        --enable-newlib-nano-malloc           \
        --disable-newlib-unbuf-stream-opt     \
        --enable-newlib-reent-small           \
        --disable-newlib-fvwrite-in-streamio  \
        --disable-newlib-fseek-optimization   \
        --disable-newlib-wide-orient          \
The options that are common are
Code:
       --enable-newlib-reent-check-verify \
        --enable-newlib-retargetable-locking \
        --disable-newlib-supplied-syscalls \
        --disable-nls   \
        --target=arm-none-eabi   \
        --build=aarch64-linux-gnu
I see that the build option is wrong. Surely it should be --build=aarch64-slackware-linux
The options that are ommitted are
Code:
        --enable-newlib-io-long-long \
        --enable-newlib-io-c99-formats \
        --enable-newlib-register-fini \
I hope I have this right.

Dunc.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-10-2022, 02:29 AM   #28
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
So far the gcc rebuild yielded the watchdog.o to get compiled.

Next the newlib rebuild didn't manage to get me past g_nano or c_nano error messages.

That nano is something that came along with libc growing over years and small systems coming out with ever tighter options and space at disposal:

Many safeguards and options, namely floating point usage in simple message text formatting and the like is dropped, stripping the library to a bare functional minimum - a nano libc.

And it being part of GNU ecosystem - ergo g_nano...

Now i go on trying to get newlib's Slackbuild spew that nano out for me B-]
 
Old 09-10-2022, 08:00 AM   #29
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 17,208

Rep: Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537Reputation: 2537
My advice is not to bother about it unless the space runs out. I did some work with uClibc and you end up having to patch everything. Even then you can have the system on squashfs if you have to.
 
Old 09-10-2022, 02:37 PM   #30
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,495

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997Reputation: 997
https://newlib.sourceware.narkive.co...-and-libg-nano

Is this correct, it merely copies the darn things over and renames them?

I'm at loss of words...
 
  


Reply

Tags
arm, bananapi, cortex-m3, klipper, slackbuilds


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Banana Pi M3 Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie) root read only matthewobrn Linux - Newbie 4 06-02-2017 04:30 PM
I need an arm EABI version 4 libxml2.so library file David Li Linux - Newbie 2 07-11-2012 02:29 PM
What is quicker/best soft, softfp, or hardfp and when? JonathanWilson Linux - Embedded & Single-board computer 1 04-25-2011 01:45 PM
LXer: Analysis: Why EABI matters LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-16-2007 06:46 AM
LXer: Debian ARM accelerates via EABI port LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-20-2007 05:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware > Slackware - ARM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration