Slackware - ARM This forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
02-02-2021, 07:06 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Mysore
Distribution: Mandrake, Libranet, Slackware
Posts: 148
Rep:
|
Are aarch64 and armv7l different architectures?
Request for any information on this.
|
|
|
02-03-2021, 12:09 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2020
Location: Japan/RJCC
Distribution: debian, lfs, whatever else i need in qemu
Posts: 268
Rep:
|
Yes, the same way amd64 and i686 are.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2021, 03:22 AM
|
#3
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,676
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsamurti
Request for any information on this.
|
"ARM" (since the release of AArch64 architecture) = 32bit ARM architecture, which goes from version/generation 2 (not sure what happened to v1) to ARM v7.
AArch64 is ARM's marketing name for their 64-bit architecture. They continued the generation/version line though, so the baseline AArch64 is named ARMv8.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
11-11-2024, 07:41 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2024
Posts: 1
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinfoil3d
Yes, the same way amd64 and i686 are.
|
Can't believe I have registered an account for this or the fact that I am necro-ing this thread but if anyone stumbles upon this message please consider this.
If you are having a bad day or are just generally insufferable to the point of leaving snarky answers to genuine questions, please refrain from posting. You can laugh and gloat all you want without the expense of making fun of the inexperienced publicly.
It's unfortunate enough that many online communities are filled with self-righteous individuals who provide unhelpful or condescending responses to genuine questions but you can help by simply just not typing or being genuine in general. Doing so will create an environment that lets people grow with no discouragement.
|
|
|
11-11-2024, 08:40 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: LFS, AntiX, Slackware
Posts: 8,308
|
Wow! Where did all that venom come from? And in your first post too. I don't know who tinfoil3d is but the point he/she made is perfectly valid: namely that aarch64 and arm are related in precisely the same way as amd64 and i686. I don't detect any sarcasm there, it's a very helpful analogy. If I was the OP and had received that answer, I would think, "OK, now I understand."
Last edited by hazel; 11-11-2024 at 08:43 AM.
|
|
3 members found this post helpful.
|
11-11-2024, 10:29 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Wild West Wales, UK
Distribution: Linux Mint 22 MATE, Peppermint OS-Devuan, EndeavourOS, antiX
Posts: 4,423
|
ihateyouinparticular,
Quote:
Originally Posted by ihateyouinparticular
Can't believe I have registered an account for this or the fact that I am necro-ing this thread but if anyone stumbles upon this message please consider this.
If you are having a bad day or are just generally insufferable to the point of leaving snarky answers to genuine questions, please refrain from posting. You can laugh and gloat all you want without the expense of making fun of the inexperienced publicly.
It's unfortunate enough that many online communities are filled with self-righteous individuals who provide unhelpful or condescending responses to genuine questions but you can help by simply just not typing or being genuine in general. Doing so will create an environment that lets people grow with no discouragement.
|
My, you are a long way up on that high horse of yours!
Make sure you copy and paste your invaluable contribution to all new forums that you join.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|