Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
08-10-2007, 06:03 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Rep:
|
wireless WEP problem in Slackware 12
I have a Slackware 11 partition and a Slackware 12 partition on the same tower. It's a 200 MHz tower with 256 MB of RAM and a PCI Belkin Wireless G card that uses Driverloader and bcm43xx for modules in kernel 2.6.22.1 on both partitions. The /etc/rc.d/rc.wireless.conf file on each partition is:
VERBOSE=1
case "$HWADDR" in
*)
INFO="Belkin Wireless G"
ESSID="LinuxNeighborhood"
MODE="Managed"
KEY="5882c0e45b11cb5e215fc308d5"
;;
esac
The iwconfig command on each partition shows an encryption key and ifconfig shows that it was assigned a static IP address from my router. Only in Slack 11 do I see link quality is > 0. In Slack 12 I need to disable WEP at my router and comment the KEY line for networking to work. Why?
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 03:56 AM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Turku, Finland
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo
Posts: 388
Rep:
|
Perhaps your router does not see that the password is meant to be in HEX and interprets it as an ASCII password?
Btw. WEP is really badly broken. It was just recently hacked in 1-2 minutes using a new method. If security is a concern, you should consider using some other encryption method on top of WEP (IPSec, SSHFS). Or you could upgrade to WPA2.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 05:19 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I know WEP is not that good, but that's all Verizon gives it's DSL customers. I have a Westell Versalink with 128 bit WEP. The router is ok and works fine in Slackware 10.2 and now Slackware 11. It's Slackware 12 that has the problem.
|
|
|
08-11-2007, 07:37 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,973
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxhippy
I know WEP is not that good, but that's all Verizon gives it's DSL customers. I have a Westell Versalink with 128 bit WEP. The router is ok and works fine in Slackware 10.2 and now Slackware 11. It's Slackware 12 that has the problem.
|
Hi,
Sure WEP is not the best. But it's just like any other key, 'keeps the honest people honest'. If someone wants into something, be it a house or a computer they can just break in. Either with a brick or a computer tool, the intruder will get in. You are the one who needs to setup the security at the level you feel is enough. Most home or SOHO are not really attacked that often, mostly by the 'script kiddy'. If your open then you will get hit.
A old but good article for WEP cracking.
I like to use Steve Gibson's ' ShieldsUp' to do a good general test of a site for posts and access. Just be careful, if your ISP uses a proxy then you should follow Steve's directions to test as such.
|
|
|
09-07-2007, 04:25 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I still can only use Slackware 11 when 128 bit WEP is enabled on my router but cannot decipher WEP in Slackware 12. Do I need to configure a file other than /etc/rc.d/rc.wireless.conf in Slackware 12 if I have WEP enabled?
|
|
|
09-07-2007, 05:42 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I got Slack 12 to work with WEP by removing the Slack 12 wireless-tools package and installing the Slack 11 wireless-tools package:
removepkg wireless-tools
installpkg wireless-tools-28-i486-3.tgz
Then I copied my Slack 11 rc.wireless.conf with my WEP key to my Slack 12 partition and rebooted. Now hex WEP works fine!
|
|
|
09-09-2007, 07:56 AM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,973
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linuxhippy
I got Slack 12 to work with WEP by removing the Slack 12 wireless-tools package and installing the Slack 11 wireless-tools package:
removepkg wireless-tools
installpkg wireless-tools-28-i486-3.tgz
Then I copied my Slack 11 rc.wireless.conf with my WEP key to my Slack 12 partition and rebooted. Now hex WEP works fine!
|
Hi,
Alien_Bob should be able to answer as to the difference between the two versions. He is the author/programmer/developer for the wireless software packages.
Edit: Eric, what is the difference between Slack 11 & 12 wireless tools?
Last edited by onebuck; 09-09-2007 at 07:57 AM.
|
|
|
09-09-2007, 10:42 AM
|
#8
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck
Hi,
Alien_Bob should be able to answer as to the difference between the two versions. He is the author/programmer/developer for the wireless software packages.
Edit: Eric, what is the difference between Slack 11 & 12 wireless tools?
|
I con't seem any difference in the binaries apart from being recompiled with gcc4 - it is still the same version 28 of wireless_tools.
The Slackware 12.0 package has a newer version of my rc.wireless script but I know other people for whom WEP encryption works well in Slackware 12.0.
Maybe you can show us the output of "iwconfig"?
Eric
|
|
|
09-09-2007, 05:02 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
sure, here is the iwconfig output currently in Slack 12 and the Slack 11 wireless-tools package:
root@LinuxHippy:/home/huntz# iwconfig
lo no wireless extensions.
eth0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:"LinuxNeighborhood" Nickname:"LinuxHippy"
Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: 00:E0:98:CD:4D:66
Bit Rate=48 Mb/s Tx-Power:0 dBm
RTS thr  ff Fragment thr  ff
Encryption key:5882-C0E4-5B11-CB5E-215F-C308-D5
Power Management  ff
Link Quality=7/94 Signal level=-68 dBm Noise level=-154 dBm
Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:158354 Missed beacon:0
|
|
|
09-10-2007, 12:10 AM
|
#10
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559
|
Yeah, but that was to be expected... Rather I'd have seen the output with the Slackware 12.0 original package of course.
Eric
|
|
|
09-10-2007, 03:15 AM
|
#11
|
HCL Maintainer
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Arch, Gentoo
Posts: 6,942
Rep: 
|
Marty,
If you use VBCode you can remove those smiley faces from your output.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|