Why Patrick Volkerding did not modernized Slackware?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Using a slackware in the company is practically guarantee of problems and lack of maintenance.
Even the Gentoo resolve software dependences using the Portage.
Why Patrick Volkerding did not modernized Slackware?
Hi,
We are using Slackware as a server for monitoring a cluster system at our facility. I maintain this server without any problems.
We are soon getting up an FTP/SFTP/Distribution-server that will run Slackware. The servers that we maintain for our-self are running Slackware, everything else is running Red Hat Linux.
I've tried writing a constructive answer to the OP but every variation of a response indicates I'm being trolled. If you want to start a serious discussion on this please elaborate, thoughtfully, on your points. With only one post in your bag, and one of the most vague usernames possible, there's little evidence that you care enough about the subject matter to dignify considered responses.
At the risk of feeding a possible troll or just someone who really doesn't "get it" (yet lashes out about it) let me ask you to consider this.
Do you not realize most companies turn off updates exactly because they risk the base system and for what puny gain? Do you realize there are small business still running DOS in-house? "New" does not automatically equal "Improved". Have you not noticed that a large share of Enterprise systems run on Debian Stable and NOT Testing?... and Debian Stable has many packages older than Slackware does, so what sort of "maintenance" are you talking about?. I really want to hear what "problems" you imagine.
What makes you think someone holding your hand and doing the work for you is modern, let alone better? More importantly, if that's what you prefer, why complain or even question why anyone else chooses differently?
Unfortunately, I heard a discourse similar with the one of OP so many times in real life.
Apparently he just repeat what others told him; and I do not think that makes sense to try to explain him what we do here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IT student
Using a slackware in the company is practically guarantee of problems and lack of maintenance.
There's a saying: use the right tool for the right job.
Long story short, the Slackware was not designed specifically to be used in a Company, and IF your colleagues has this opinion about Slackware, then better hear them and use the right tool for your Company, e.g. CentOS or RHEL.
Last edited by Darth Vader; 08-03-2018 at 03:45 AM.
Using a slackware in the company is practically guarantee of problems and lack of maintenance.
If you are using Slackware in a business environment and suffer from lack of maintenance or they cannot do dependency resolution, you need to hire a new IT staff or use a different distro as has been suggested like Debian or CentOS.
Seems like one post flame-war provocateur. I wonder why I even respond to this at all
I can periodically see some one-poster newbies raising controversial topics and I am really surprised how big audience is triggered by them. Maybe some people just want to keep the fire burning
If I would be a newbie I definitely would not create a thread like this (in my first post)...
There's a saying: use the right tool for the right job.
Long story short, the Slackware was not designed specifically to be used in a Company, and IF your colleagues has this opinion about Slackware, then better hear them and use the right tool for your Company, e.g. CentOS or RHEL.
Furthermore, the answer to the OP's question can be succinctly summarised by the quote in my signature: "Slack has a very specific focus, and it's not ease-of-use".
Quote:
Originally Posted by hua
Seems like one post flame-war provocateur. I wonder why I even respond to this at all
I can periodically see some one-poster newbies raising controversial topics and I am really surprised how big audience is triggered by them. Maybe some people just want to keep the fire burning
If I would be a newbie I definitely would not create a thread like this (in my first post)...
Most first posts are support requests. This is just trolling.
Last edited by Lysander666; 08-03-2018 at 04:21 AM.
Furthermore, the answer to the OP's question can be succinctly summarised by the quote in my signature: "Slack has a very specific focus, and it's not ease-of-use"...
May not be focussed on it, but it does come as a bonus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerard Lally
I used to enjoy trolls, back in the 90s and early 00s. That was when they were funny, of course.
Different culture, back then people took the trouble to respond like this.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.