Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 04:42 PM
|
#46
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816
Rep:
|
I'd like to add something about Slackware that rocks and I think that no one has mentioned: The community is the best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
Well, if this thread doesn't become one [a giant flamewar], I'll eat my hat.
|
mmmm.... I had a spare cap somewhere around here... I shall look for it but don't hold your breath.
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
I have never, EVER been into an office that used slackware.
|
You should come here, I recently changed the mail server from a qmail installation on RHEL3 to one on Slackware 10.2 (for budget purposes). And we host several domains (30+), proan.com, proan.com.mx being the most notable ones for this region.
It's just a typical LAMP (Linux + Apache + Mysql + Php) installation.
Last edited by raska; 08-28-2006 at 04:45 PM.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 04:46 PM
|
#47
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: The Pudding Isles
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 573
Rep:
|
This is purely personal, but I like Slackware because it is the _only_ distro that installs on my machine without hassles.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 05:27 PM
|
#48
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by raska
I'd like to add something about Slackware that rocks and I think that no one has mentioned: The community is the best.
mmmm.... I had a spare cap somewhere around here... I shall look for it but don't hold your breath.
You should come here, I recently changed the mail server from a qmail installation on RHEL3 to one on Slackware 10.2 (for budget purposes). And we host several domains (30+), proan.com, proan.com.mx being the most notable ones for this region.
It's just a typical LAMP (Linux + Apache + Mysql + Php) installation.
|
Don't get me wrong, i've seen Linux used on many different servers, and in many different officies, but I have never seen Slackware used. Companies almost always opt for the (more expensive) official vendor support and the ability to have a person to call if something goes wrong. They always go for Novell/Red Hat, or an entirely different commercial flavor of unix.(Or windows)
It doesn't have anything to do with the quality of slackware itself, it's just that if something goes wrong, the Boss is going to want to call an expensive and needlessly certified professional, and there really are no such people for Slackware.
Also slackware doesn't have NEARLY the amount of testing and quality control as Red Hat does, and it does not come with ANY warranty, implied or expressed, what so ever. It would take quite a lot to convince a company to switch to Slackware over redhat.
Last edited by liquidtenmilion; 08-28-2006 at 07:05 PM.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 06:06 PM
|
#49
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Distribution: Raspbian, Debian, Slackware, OS X
Posts: 443
Rep:
|
I like Slackware because it stays out of my way.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 06:40 PM
|
#50
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168
Rep:
|
LILO and KDE, setup lets me use ReiserFS, and no SELinux... though highly tweakable, I actually had to do surprisingly little, defaults were already pretty close to what I wanted.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 06:41 PM
|
#51
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,412
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
I will say this: People can say whatever they like about Slackware. It works for me, and that's all I care about. Simplicity is the key to everything in life.
|
Agreed. Slackware works for me and runs well on my units.
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 08:36 PM
|
#52
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: "The South Coast of Texas"
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 564
Rep:
|
From liquidtenmillion:
Quote:
If you keep stable, you NEVER have to worry about upgrading python or having progtrams not start, and backups are rarely needed.
|
Maybe, but if I kept stable, gramps may not run at all, not to mention gnucash or a couple of other programs that depend on newer packages. But I can do what I want, formulating arcane backup procedures, while leaving others as happy as I am, secure & stable.
Regards,
Bill
|
|
|
08-28-2006, 10:33 PM
|
#53
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA: USA
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 1,191
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
Don't get me wrong, i've seen Linux used on many different servers, and in many different officies, but I have never seen Slackware used. Companies almost always opt for the (more expensive) official vendor support and the ability to have a person to call if something goes wrong. They always go for Novell/Red Hat, or an entirely different commercial flavor of unix.(Or windows)
|
My friend is the sysadmin for a chain of tire/mechanic shops. He uses Slackware on every level of the network, from providing a login server for the client machines, to hosting security camera footage over a sercure http connection.
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
Also slackware doesn't have NEARLY the amount of testing and quality control as Red Hat does
|
I disagee. The community is the best quality control you can get.
With that said, I find there are a lot more bugs reported in Redhat then Slackware.
Quote:
Originally Posted by truthfatal
I like Slackware because it stays out of my way.
|
I second that!
...drkstr
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|