LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-28-2006, 04:42 PM   #46
raska
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816

Rep: Reputation: 31

I'd like to add something about Slackware that rocks and I think that no one has mentioned: The community is the best.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen
Well, if this thread doesn't become one [a giant flamewar], I'll eat my hat.
mmmm.... I had a spare cap somewhere around here... I shall look for it but don't hold your breath.

Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
I have never, EVER been into an office that used slackware.
You should come here, I recently changed the mail server from a qmail installation on RHEL3 to one on Slackware 10.2 (for budget purposes). And we host several domains (30+), proan.com, proan.com.mx being the most notable ones for this region.
It's just a typical LAMP (Linux + Apache + Mysql + Php) installation.

Last edited by raska; 08-28-2006 at 04:45 PM.
 
Old 08-28-2006, 04:46 PM   #47
Eternal_Newbie
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: The Pudding Isles
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 573

Rep: Reputation: 59
This is purely personal, but I like Slackware because it is the _only_ distro that installs on my machine without hassles.
 
Old 08-28-2006, 05:27 PM   #48
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by raska
I'd like to add something about Slackware that rocks and I think that no one has mentioned: The community is the best.


mmmm.... I had a spare cap somewhere around here... I shall look for it but don't hold your breath.


You should come here, I recently changed the mail server from a qmail installation on RHEL3 to one on Slackware 10.2 (for budget purposes). And we host several domains (30+), proan.com, proan.com.mx being the most notable ones for this region.
It's just a typical LAMP (Linux + Apache + Mysql + Php) installation.

Don't get me wrong, i've seen Linux used on many different servers, and in many different officies, but I have never seen Slackware used. Companies almost always opt for the (more expensive) official vendor support and the ability to have a person to call if something goes wrong. They always go for Novell/Red Hat, or an entirely different commercial flavor of unix.(Or windows)

It doesn't have anything to do with the quality of slackware itself, it's just that if something goes wrong, the Boss is going to want to call an expensive and needlessly certified professional, and there really are no such people for Slackware.

Also slackware doesn't have NEARLY the amount of testing and quality control as Red Hat does, and it does not come with ANY warranty, implied or expressed, what so ever. It would take quite a lot to convince a company to switch to Slackware over redhat.

Last edited by liquidtenmilion; 08-28-2006 at 07:05 PM.
 
Old 08-28-2006, 06:06 PM   #49
truthfatal
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Distribution: Raspbian, Debian, Slackware, OS X
Posts: 443
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 32
I like Slackware because it stays out of my way.
 
Old 08-28-2006, 06:40 PM   #50
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
LILO and KDE, setup lets me use ReiserFS, and no SELinux... though highly tweakable, I actually had to do surprisingly little, defaults were already pretty close to what I wanted.
 
Old 08-28-2006, 06:41 PM   #51
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,412

Rep: Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831Reputation: 3831
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkelsen

I will say this: People can say whatever they like about Slackware. It works for me, and that's all I care about. Simplicity is the key to everything in life.
Agreed. Slackware works for me and runs well on my units.
 
Old 08-28-2006, 08:36 PM   #52
TSquaredF
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: "The South Coast of Texas"
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 564

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
From liquidtenmillion:
Quote:
If you keep stable, you NEVER have to worry about upgrading python or having progtrams not start, and backups are rarely needed.
Maybe, but if I kept stable, gramps may not run at all, not to mention gnucash or a couple of other programs that depend on newer packages. But I can do what I want, formulating arcane backup procedures, while leaving others as happy as I am, secure & stable.
Regards,
Bill
 
Old 08-28-2006, 10:33 PM   #53
drkstr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA: USA
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 1,191

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
Don't get me wrong, i've seen Linux used on many different servers, and in many different officies, but I have never seen Slackware used. Companies almost always opt for the (more expensive) official vendor support and the ability to have a person to call if something goes wrong. They always go for Novell/Red Hat, or an entirely different commercial flavor of unix.(Or windows)
My friend is the sysadmin for a chain of tire/mechanic shops. He uses Slackware on every level of the network, from providing a login server for the client machines, to hosting security camera footage over a sercure http connection.
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
Also slackware doesn't have NEARLY the amount of testing and quality control as Red Hat does
I disagee. The community is the best quality control you can get.

With that said, I find there are a lot more bugs reported in Redhat then Slackware.

Quote:
Originally Posted by truthfatal
I like Slackware because it stays out of my way.
I second that!

...drkstr
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About Slackware 9.1 boot disk?? ftp://ftp.kpn.be/pub/linux/slackware/slackware-9.1-is AL3OMDAH Slackware 4 04-18-2007 09:54 AM
Dual boot windows/slackware, but slackware installed first? Cryptic_K Slackware 3 11-20-2006 12:49 PM
using older slackware package for newer slackware. Is it problematic? hottdogg Slackware 2 12-13-2005 03:57 AM
Newer Slackware Packages on older slackware version pengStudent Slackware 2 11-12-2003 12:47 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration