SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I think you've got to try other distros, otherwise how can you appreciate how good Slack is? Distrohopping is only a bad thing if you feel compelled to try out every new distro or every release of an existing distro that comes out. Then you need Distrohoppers Anonymous.
I freely admit to being a DH for years, but I am in active recovery now. I am down to only three (Ubuntu 'cause I just can't seem to get video editing in Slack, and Fedora because I have a soft spot for it.) Slack has been my main workhorse now for almost two years. Not even tempted to fall off the wagon with another distro now. Guess you have to go through all twelve steps to finally see the light.
Bob
Oh, and it does help when you have the best forum anywhere on the net for any distro to turn to...
Last edited by BobNutfield; 07-23-2009 at 04:23 PM.
The only one I've been tempted to try lately is Arch Linux, but then I read that they always use cutting-edge packages that aren't always well-tested. I prefer Slackware's stability.
Might be off topic , but i honestly can't even imagine how some people are able to run 3-4 distributions at the same time. It's too confusing.
Well, sometimes you have no choice... If you work at a place with several servers with different distros, or have several clients with different preferences...
But at home I only use Slackware!
Might be off topic , but i honestly can't even imagine how some people are able to run 3-4 distributions at the same time. It's too confusing.
Well, I mentioned in my post that they were all three for different purposes. Ubuntu for video editing, Fedora because I am interested in its progress, and Slack for everything else.
I also have two cars, two houses, six pairs of shoes, about a dozen power tools, five computers and three TV's. I don't feel a bit confused.
... and the complexity level is sufficient as it is...
I wrote this summary on the Linux Outlaws forum. My distrohopping philosophy is to have a running Slackware-Stable partition and using other partitions for testing.
"But Slackware does have som elegant and simpler solutions - the way a bow and arrow are simpler than a gun; you can't just point and click, but those who know what they are doing can get the job done very efficiently without the damned thing suddenly blowing up in your face."
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.