Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 10:40 AM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 189
Rep:
|
I would also like to take this opportunity to thank all, whoever have helped me solve my problems.
I think this is the true spirit (also strength) of linux.
hardik
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 12:18 PM
|
#17
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Quote:
"If you want to learn <distro>, then install <distro>. If you want to learn Linux, install Slackware."
|
I don't agree with this statement. There is no specific standard for Linux distros so someone who knows Slack does not necessarily know "Linux" because other distros are different. I agree with Hari, that this statement is kind of elitist and I have seen it being thrown around by Slackers on other sites because they feel superior to other Linux users because they are running Slack. I have noticed something similar with a certain group of Gentoo users.
LQ has a large community of Slackers, so there are more chances of questions being answered. Many Slackers on this site take their distro seriously and are quite helpful to other Slackers (which I found out myself when I used Slack). On other forums, I have noticed many who are arrogant and unhelpful. Something else I have noticed in the Slack forum is that there aren't many duplicate threads, which can keep people interested in helping out.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 12:49 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: 33.31N -111.97W
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 919
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddazz
I don't agree with this statement. There is no specific standard for Linux distros so someone who knows Slack does not necessarily know "Linux" because other distros are different.
|
If the statement is taken as an absolute then it is of course false. However, from what I have seen, it is used by most to be a general observation (with some obvious exceptions), and I would have to say that it has also been my experience that you can often take more away from Slack and apply it to other Linux environments than with a lot of other distros. This does not make Slack "better", nor does it mean that everyone will share the same experience.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddazz
On other forums, I have noticed many who are arrogant and unhelpful.
|
I think we can all agree there are always bad eggs around, no matter the association.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 01:05 PM
|
#19
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Quote:
... you can often take more away from Slack and apply it to other Linux environments than with a lot of other distros.
|
Personally I think the knowledge gained on any Linux distro can help you in other Linux or Unix environments because the basics of how the OSes work is the same. If you are willing to look under the hood, you will learn a lot and that knowledge is easily transferable between distros and other Unix OSes. The only reason why many people are of the opinion that you learn a lot with Slack is that its very hands on, just like Gentoo, Arch, LFS etc.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 01:06 PM
|
#20
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Havant, Hampshire, UK
Distribution: Slamd64, Slackware, PS2Linux
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
Much more elegantly and succinctly put than the post I've just written, Xian, thank you!
I'll leave the last paragraph =)
"Ok, I've said my piece and will resume helping anyone who turns up, regardless of distro, who can bring me an interesting problem."
- Piete.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 01:30 PM
|
#21
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3
Rep:
|
I agree with everybody here. Slack definetly is a great Distro to start learning linux. I also really loved Gentoo as well. I had a blast learning how to install that one. But Slack is a perfect place to start. I rarely have ever had to ask a question here. I can always search and find my answer. But no matter what distro I use. I always seem to find myself going back to Slack. As J.W. said. Slack just has a place in my heart.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 02:24 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Distribution: Slack 11
Posts: 1,737
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNutfield
Hi everybody,
Just a comment. I run three distros at home (Ubuntu, FC4 & 5, Mepis, and Slack).
|
Isnt that 4?
I have to agree, there always seems to be help in the slack forum, Dont know why, thats just the way it is.
|
|
|
04-11-2006, 02:42 PM
|
#23
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
Regarding the "if you want to learn..." quote, it's been around for years and it does have some basis in fact. Specifically, when running certain tasks (eg installing new packages) many distros will shield the user from the actual commands being run by concealing them behind a nice looking GUI. In contrast, Slack puts a heavier emphasis on the CLI, which has a tendency to educate the user much more thoroughly. Consider installing new packages: if you're using SuSE, what you learn is that you just need to launch YaST to add new packages. If you're using Slack however, you will learn the 5 step CLI method of installing packages (eg, "tar -zxvf <package>" and so forth), and knowing how to manually install software via the CLI is a tranferable skill. Someone who has that knowledge can work with any distro, but if someone only knows how to use a particular GUI (eg YaST), that knowledge will only be useful while using that one particular distro. Hence, "...if you want to learn Linux, install Slack"
To use an analogy, consider how phone numbers can be saved in a cell phone's memory, and let's suppose that "A" makes a habit of calling his friends by pressing one single button, while "B" always calls his friends by dialing the full number. Now suppose that the phone's battery runs out or it gets left behind in a taxi. Who's going to be better off - the person who actually knows his friend's numbers, or the person who relies completely on his cell to remember them for him?
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 02:46 AM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Rep:
|
Quote:
Regarding the "if you want to learn..." quote, it's been around for years and it does have some basis in fact. Specifically, when running certain tasks (eg installing new packages) many distros will shield the user from the actual commands being run by concealing them behind a nice looking GUI. In contrast, Slack puts a heavier emphasis on the CLI, which has a tendency to educate the user much more thoroughly.
|
I don't think there's anything universal about the Slackware package management system. I should think DEBs and RPMs are more popular. And in any case that quote *does* smack of elitism whenever somebody puts it, whatever they might mean.
There is no inherent virtue in antiquity. Because it's been around for years doesn't make it true...
Remember, I am pro-Linux and anti-nothing. To me, Slackware is just a distro - a great distro that's been around for the longest, but that doesn't give it any special status within the community. That also doesn't mean that the Slackware community is superior to the communities of any other distros. You can learn Linux on any Linux system, not just Slackware. Just because Slackware forces somebody to learn, that's not necessarily a virtue for everybody.
As I said before, I don't claim any special status within this community just because I use multiple distros. But it always irritates me whenever a Slackware user tries to denigrate other distros by claiming to be superior and using that quote, which I must admit annoys me a lot...
Sorry for ranting on, but I feel quite strongly about that quotation: when you use Slackware, you learn Linux etc. etc. I know from experience that this learning process just doesn't follow... Every user has his/her own needs and levels of learning and you can learn a lot using any other Linux distro.
Quote:
To use an analogy, consider how phone numbers can be saved in a cell phone's memory, and let's suppose that "A" makes a habit of calling his friends by pressing one single button, while "B" always calls his friends by dialing the full number. Now suppose that the phone's battery runs out or it gets left behind in a taxi. Who's going to be better off - the person who actually knows his friend's numbers, or the person who relies completely on his cell to remember them for him?
|
I cannot quite understand how that analogy relates to this. Human beings have always sought easier and easier ways of doing complicated things. The evolution from machine language to assembly to high-level languages is similar to your analogy and it doesn't quite relate to comparing on a horizontal level like different Linux distros.
As you said, cell phones store numbers in memory, but that doesn't quite prevent you from typing the number every time you want. Those who don't want that memory feature can well not use it rather than asking the manufacturer to remove that phone memory altogether. What I want to say is that the option to store the phone memory is a great one for many people. Imagine a cell phone tomorrow which comes with no memory to store phone numbers and telling the customers that to use it you need to use your brains...
Last edited by vharishankar; 04-12-2006 at 02:54 AM.
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 03:44 AM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,247
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harishankar
Human beings have always sought easier and easier ways of doing complicated things. The evolution from machine language to assembly to high-level languages is similar to your analogy and it doesn't quite relate to comparing on a horizontal level like different Linux distros.
|
High level languages are not able to do full low-level interaction with hardware, that's why learning low-level programming language (assembly) is good.
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 05:48 AM
|
#26
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 301
Rep:
|
Quote:
and knowing how to manually install software via the CLI is a tranferable skill. Someone who has that knowledge can work with any distro, but if someone only knows how to use a particular GUI (eg YaST), that knowledge will only be useful while using that one particular distro. Hence, "...if you want to learn Linux, install Slack"
|
maybe slackers are just better at hacking things together? we got lots of practice.
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 07:57 AM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Rep:
|
Quote:
High level languages are not able to do full low-level interaction with hardware, that's why learning low-level programming language (assembly) is good.
|
The question is, should every programmer be forced to do assembly/machine level coding?
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 11:58 AM
|
#28
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: In my house.
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 64bit, Slackware 13.1 64-bit
Posts: 2,649
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddazz
Personally I think the knowledge gained on any Linux distro can help you in other Linux or Unix environments because the basics of how the OSes work is the same. If you are willing to look under the hood, you will learn a lot and that knowledge is easily transferable between distros and other Unix OSes. The only reason why many people are of the opinion that you learn a lot with Slack is that its very hands on, just like Gentoo, Arch, LFS etc.
|
That is why I like Slack. I can easily 'get under the hood'. On some other distro's, you get the feeling that is forbidden....
As for why this forum is helpful, and friendly:
It's the community. End of story.
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 12:20 PM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Luxemburg
Distribution: Slackware, OS X
Posts: 1,507
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harishankar
And in any case that quote *does* smack of elitism whenever somebody puts it, whatever they might mean.
|
To me, this statement just means that Slackware as a distro teaches you how things work. And that's true.
A similar statement can be found on Distrowatch:
Quote:
Perhaps the best characteristic of this distribution I have heard is this: if you need help with your Linux box, find a Slackware user. A Slackware user is more likely to fix the problem than a user familiar with any other distribution.
|
Last edited by uselpa; 04-12-2006 at 12:22 PM.
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 12:24 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250
Rep:
|
Just a quick comment on the thread. The eagerness of slackware people to help out others on this forum is obvious, and that's a good thing. In my own observations, Debian and Slack have by far the best support community here. One of the reasons I switched from Redhat/Fedora was exactly that.
I would caution you all, tho, to be cautious about encouraging newbies to use Slack because, that way they'll really learn Linux. The conversion from Windows to Linux is pretty overwhelming anyway, and by the looks of some questions I see, quite a number of people bite off more than they can chew trying to dive directly onto that deep water.
My own 'truism' would be that if you want to learn Linux, get Slack ... If you want to learn to use Linux productively, get Debian.
There are, however, lots of reasons for people to choose other distros; some of them are even GOOD reasons. Anyway, a nod of approval to the the Slackers from me, but ... Debian Rules!
Last edited by rickh; 04-12-2006 at 12:25 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|