LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-13-2008, 07:24 PM   #16
Woodsman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 3,482

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546

I'm grateful for the feedback and the stories each of you are sharing!

The larger hard drive is now a moot point. I long ago forgot that the key point was making the first 1024 cylinders available and from there the kernel will do fine with the remainder of the disk. I have larger spare drives that would provide sufficient swap space to overcome the meager 16 MB of RAM. With that perspective, installing Slackware or any distro is feasible ---running the system is another issue.

I'm wondering, however, what other's experience might be with running the 16MB in a dumb terminal (LTSP) rather than stand-alone machine. No hard drive necessary. Perhaps some of the previous answers were written within that perspective and I misread them. Would 16 MB be sufficient for a dumb terminal and basic window manager?

Quote:
Grab a binary copy of XFree86 3.3.6
I might look for an older version of Slackware and install. PV keeps previous versions patched for many years, therefore security is no issue. I think PV moved from Xfree to Xorg in version 10.0, therefore 9.1 would be the last release with Xfree.
 
Old 08-13-2008, 09:52 PM   #17
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
I noticed one of the suggestions was to use Fluxbox or Blackbox as a window manager - pff, I suggest Ion3.
 
Old 08-13-2008, 10:20 PM   #18
Galaxy66
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
If you really want a graphical desktop and the video card is too old for Xorg, I'll re-iterate the recommendation by others to try DeLi Linux: http://www.delilinux.org/

There's a XFree86 3.3.6 package available for DeLi: http://www.delilinux.org/forum/topic.php?id=140

I actually tried it on a 1992 vintage Packard Bell 486 with Video7/Headland graphics and it worked fine once I dusted off the brain cells that once knew how to hand-edit the XF86Config file.
 
Old 08-14-2008, 09:18 PM   #19
FreonTrip
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
More than you may think...

This PC isn't really a 90 pound weakling so much as an Ichthyostega in a land of wolves...

A juke box? Perhaps, although at 6 MB a song, along with the OS, a 512 MB drive will only hold a few dozen songs. Perhaps the BIOS supports an old 3.2 GB hard drive sitting on my shelf, but I'm not holding my breath. This is a vintage 1991 BIOS.

If I were to use it as a juke box, I'd probably just set up the system with a command-line media player, then have it ssh into a nearby system with a big hard drive full of MP3s and just play in the background. This begs the question, "Why don't I just use the other system in the first place?," but that kind of thinking just isn't adventurous. :P

Slackware 11's probably about as modern a distribution as it can realistically handle, unless you want to prove how monstrously insane you are by compiling a heavily tweaked, low-overhead Gentoo install and have a month or so to spend doing it.

If you must run X11, twm's probably your only safe bet.

Last edited by FreonTrip; 08-15-2008 at 10:24 PM. Reason: Misspelled 'ichthyostega'
 
Old 08-14-2008, 09:25 PM   #20
IsaacKuo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian Stable
Posts: 2,546
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465Reputation: 465
I find icewm-lite consumes a hair less RAM than twm, and it's far more usable. Even full icewm consumes less ram than fluxbox (depending on what theme you use).
 
Old 08-15-2008, 10:02 AM   #21
amani
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Kolkata, India
Distribution: Debian 64-bit GNU/Linux, Kubuntu64, Fedora QA, Slackware,
Posts: 2,766

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
See SliTaz

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/...tifully_marked

It can be helpful.
 
  


Reply

Tags
helpful



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux on a 486 mezcal Linux - Newbie 2 09-09-2005 04:11 PM
Linux for a old 486 PC Flak Pyro Linux - Distributions 13 02-21-2004 01:48 PM
DivX on a 486? Gveto Linux - General 14 10-15-2003 06:34 PM
486-troubles mtb Linux - Hardware 8 03-10-2003 07:40 AM
old 486 joeey21 Linux - General 3 02-07-2002 05:54 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration