What features/changes would you like to see in future Slackware?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
For everyone who doesn't want KDE included, you do realise that you don't have to install it, don't you? It's a set of selectable packages that you can choose not to select. Remember, Slack doesn't force you to do most things.
And just to add... all of the other packages that people would prefer removed.
Jacob
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
For everyone who doesn't want KDE included, you do realise that you don't have to install it, don't you? It's a set of selectable packages that you can choose not to select. Remember, Slack doesn't force you to do most things.
And just to add... all of the other packages that people would prefer removed.
Edit: Ok... I should check the dates of comments before I reply.
What i really like sometimes is ability to use italian slacky repositories with gslapt to quickly install multimedia software which commonly have dozens of dependencies and would be pain to compile even with sbopkg.
So my wish is just to make precompiled _SBo packages available somewhere also, as i presume they are being compiled anyway on a clean slackware system during the testings of a slackbuild.
And on another note i think kde4 version of k3b on -current should go to 'testing' so people can test if it will even work. And maybe there is some replacement (lightweight)(GTK?)burner software to go to main tree.
And on another note i think kde4 version of k3b on -current should go to 'testing' so people can test if it will even work. And maybe there is some replacement (lightweight)(GTK?)burner software to go to main tree.
Cheers!
I would vote for recorder: http://code.google.com/p/recorder/
But i seriously doubt that leaving k3b out of kde/ is a solution.
Maybe the solution would be to upgrade it to some later version than the one now, and keep updating it after the release, even if its not a security update.
Once SlackBuilds.org is accepting submissions again, I'll submit it.
I've been meaning to do that myself but your scripts are SBo ready, so no need for that anymore.
I think it would be a very useful addition to SBo. Since graveman is unmaintained.
Thanks for info about recorder, thanks for the slacbuild also! (Good) K3b had just been failing me again, this time with data cd, i guess it is just not ready yet.
edit: Was rejoicing too early, recorder doesn't cut it too. I ended up with an empty /bin - :-D - i have only myself to blame i guess.
So my wish is just to make precompiled _SBo packages available somewhere also, as i presume they are being compiled anyway on a clean slackware system during the testings of a slackbuild.
Keep in mind, however, that for some software you may want to use special build options or dependencies, so using precompiled packages will not always work for you.
I've come to realize the whole issue with binary repository vs compiling is more complicated than it may seem to regular user like me.
Maybe slackbuilds.org could just package sbopkg queue files along with slackbuilds and make them available through sbopkg program interface(?).
And just to add... all of the other packages that people would prefer removed.
Edit: Ok... I should check the dates of comments before I reply.
Jacob
It's a valid point, though.
Question, to those that know: if I don't install the HAL packages, is that going to cause major problems? I'm not sure what it's used by, apart from KDE for automounting (which is why I don't use it). I don't let rc.hald execute on boot and haven't noticed any problems.
Maybe slackbuilds.org could just package sbopkg queue files along with slackbuilds and make them available through sbopkg program interface(?).
I do not think that SBo would host queue files as they are intended for sbopkg, which is a third party tool. SBo does not change things for sbopkg. Rather sbopkg is a convenience tool for people to use SBo. However, the sbopkg team may be willing to host those files on their site. If nothing else, I'm sure people will post them to the sbopkg and/or SBo mailing lists.
I do not think that SBo would host queue files as they are intended for sbopkg, which is a third party tool. SBo does not change things for sbopkg. Rather sbopkg is a convenience tool for people to use SBo. However, the sbopkg team may be willing to host those files on their site. If nothing else, I'm sure people will post them to the sbopkg and/or SBo mailing lists.
That's a good idea.
Instead of going to slackbuilds.org, and grabbing lame, faac, faad, x264, xvidcore ...... download, build, rinse, repeat, just download a single sbopkg build queue for ffmpeg.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.