SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is Slackware going to eventually have Xorg replaced by Wayland?
Curious about this, as well. I don't think it'll be replaced, since there's xorg-server and xorg-wayland-server, and there are too many Nvidia users out there. I would be surprised if X gets dropped entirely.
Not a Slackware specific comment, but everything I have read is that Wayland is a very immature project and is not even remotely ready to replace xorg any time soon. For my desktop, I could care less what the graphics server is as long as it works, and xorg works perfectly for me for now.
Having wayland in the core distro and having stuff like mesa, xorg-server, qt5, gtk+3 compiled against wayland enables all kind of future experiments after Slackware gets a stable 15.0 release.
Otherwise, anyone who would want to add some wayland-related functionality to the stable 15.0 distro would have to recompile and maintain own versions of all these core packages.
Wayland and X.Org are complementary - but a Wayland session can run X.Org based applications seamlessly. Now we can start experimenting at leisure and see what's possible.
wayland can be interesting if , "for some reason" , de desktop non start , yes, i know , we have x11 , but advantage of wayland is he can run gui apps , like desktop enviroment.
probably some one under low specifications hardware , prefer run wayland for save some memory and cpu ...raspberry´s or similar hardware ,and of course, is better if core have packages built with suporting this "optional" feature , same like pure alsa , for people no like pulse.
It is my understanding that apps must be written to work under Wayland but I may be misunderstanding that. I have probably gone out on a limb posting but it wouldn't be the first time...
AFAIK, it's a bit out of date. Other distros are shipping Wayland by default, and I haven't heard that about the apps needing to be written to work specifically with Wayland. Phoronix, take with a hefty grain of salt.
It'll be interesting to see what happens in the next 6-8 months.
For me, I guess I really don't care about Wayland, thus my remarks. It does nothing for me that xorg doesn't do already. Not saying progress is bad, and I know xorg is very old and not the the greatest solution for a PC desktop but it works. If everything I use worked with Wayland the way it works with xorg, I would switch but I don't think that is the case.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.