LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2020, 01:45 AM   #1
bartgymnast
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Almere, Netherlands
Distribution: slack 7.1 till latest and -current, LFS
Posts: 368

Rep: Reputation: 165Reputation: 165
wayland hits -current - but missing ...


it seems wayland hits -current

Code:
x/mesa-20.0.0-x86_64-1.txz:  Upgraded.
  Added Wayland platform support.
x/wayland-1.18.0-x86_64-1.txz:  Added.
x/wayland-protocols-1.18-noarch-1.txz:  Added.
x/xorg-server-1.20.7-x86_64-2.txz:  Rebuilt.
x/xorg-server-xephyr-1.20.7-x86_64-2.txz:  Rebuilt.
x/xorg-server-xnest-1.20.7-x86_64-2.txz:  Rebuilt.
x/xorg-server-xvfb-1.20.7-x86_64-2.txz:  Rebuilt.
x/xorg-server-xwayland-1.20.7-x86_64-2.txz:  Added.
can gtk+3 be recompiled with the following option to be aware of wayland
Code:
--enable-wayland-backend \
 
Old 02-20-2020, 06:33 AM   #2
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,661

Rep: Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784
I think the parameter should be
Code:
-Dwayland_backend=true
 
Old 02-20-2020, 06:48 AM   #3
chrisVV
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 548

Rep: Reputation: 370Reputation: 370Reputation: 370Reputation: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by willysr View Post
I think the parameter should be
Code:
-Dwayland_backend=true
The gtk authors recommend using autoconf for gtk+3, and meson for gtk-4.
 
Old 02-20-2020, 07:16 AM   #4
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,661

Rep: Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784
i'm just looking based on gtk+3 SlackBuild script where Patrick used meson
 
Old 02-20-2020, 08:36 AM   #5
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Also, qt5 needs a recompile to pick up the wayland functionality.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2020, 09:28 AM   #6
Lockywolf
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 683

Rep: Reputation: 253Reputation: 253Reputation: 253
What's the scope of Wayland in Slackware?

Is Slackware going to eventually have Xorg replaced by Wayland?
 
Old 02-20-2020, 10:12 AM   #7
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,534

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lockywolf View Post
What's the scope of Wayland in Slackware?

Is Slackware going to eventually have Xorg replaced by Wayland?
Curious about this, as well. I don't think it'll be replaced, since there's xorg-server and xorg-wayland-server, and there are too many Nvidia users out there. I would be surprised if X gets dropped entirely.
 
Old 02-20-2020, 10:17 AM   #8
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
Not a Slackware specific comment, but everything I have read is that Wayland is a very immature project and is not even remotely ready to replace xorg any time soon. For my desktop, I could care less what the graphics server is as long as it works, and xorg works perfectly for me for now.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2020, 10:20 AM   #9
vtel57
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64 - 14.2 w/ Xfce
Posts: 1,631

Rep: Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489
Yeah, you're old like me, @sevendogsbsd. We don't care much for change. I'm in agreement with you that xorg is fine and dandy.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2020, 12:52 PM   #10
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Having wayland in the core distro and having stuff like mesa, xorg-server, qt5, gtk+3 compiled against wayland enables all kind of future experiments after Slackware gets a stable 15.0 release.
Otherwise, anyone who would want to add some wayland-related functionality to the stable 15.0 distro would have to recompile and maintain own versions of all these core packages.
Wayland and X.Org are complementary - but a Wayland session can run X.Org based applications seamlessly. Now we can start experimenting at leisure and see what's possible.
 
9 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2020, 12:53 PM   #11
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by sevendogsbsd View Post
everything I have read is that Wayland is a very immature project and is not even remotely ready to replace xorg any time soon
Care to share where you read stuff like that, in the past two years?
 
Old 02-20-2020, 01:07 PM   #12
USUARIONUEVO
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,335

Rep: Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930
wayland can be interesting if , "for some reason" , de desktop non start , yes, i know , we have x11 , but advantage of wayland is he can run gui apps , like desktop enviroment.

probably some one under low specifications hardware , prefer run wayland for save some memory and cpu ...raspberry´s or similar hardware ,and of course, is better if core have packages built with suporting this "optional" feature , same like pure alsa , for people no like pulse.
 
Old 02-20-2020, 01:14 PM   #13
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...ault-20.04-LTS

https://drewdevault.com/2019/02/10/W...-debunked.html

And not Linux but here it goes anyway: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/w...freebsd.73857/

It is my understanding that apps must be written to work under Wayland but I may be misunderstanding that. I have probably gone out on a limb posting but it wouldn't be the first time...
 
Old 02-20-2020, 01:20 PM   #14
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,534

Rep: Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899Reputation: 899
AFAIK, it's a bit out of date. Other distros are shipping Wayland by default, and I haven't heard that about the apps needing to be written to work specifically with Wayland. Phoronix, take with a hefty grain of salt.

It'll be interesting to see what happens in the next 6-8 months.
 
Old 02-20-2020, 01:29 PM   #15
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
For me, I guess I really don't care about Wayland, thus my remarks. It does nothing for me that xorg doesn't do already. Not saying progress is bad, and I know xorg is very old and not the the greatest solution for a PC desktop but it works. If everything I use worked with Wayland the way it works with xorg, I would switch but I don't think that is the case.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wayland: Inaccessible and restrictive by design? (Aka, Wayland won't get out of my way and I don't want it in my future.) CajunCoder Linux - General 2 09-04-2017 12:32 PM
Does gnome-flashback session use wayland? Do all gtk3 apps use wayland? rubankumars Linux - Desktop 1 08-08-2017 04:13 AM
LXer: Mutter Wayland 3.11.2 Now Syncs Keymap from X.Org to Wayland LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-04-2013 02:15 AM
LXer: News: Linux Top 3: Red Hat Gets Certified, Wayland Hits 1.0 and Linux 3.7 Ramps Up LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-30-2012 06:00 PM
Future !X ? Wayland : X - what is wayland? serafean Linux - General 5 03-04-2011 11:09 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration