LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2014, 08:25 PM   #1
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Want To Try Slack - Afraid Of One Thing.....


Hello There, Slackers!

I use Crunchbang [sort of a minimalist Debian, for those who aren't familiar] as my primary OS, and am very happy with it- but half of my HDD is a partition that I use to fool around with other Linux OS's, until I find one that I want to keep as a secondary OS.

I've been wanting to try Slackware for some time now. One thing scares me: What's all this I hear about having to resolve dependencies manually?

Eek!

I mean, say you want to install a package. Does it tell you what dependencies it needs when you go to install it, and then you have to type in the names of those dependencies to install them, or what?

I'm no computer-geek.....but I've found all the distros I've tried so far to be very easy- but then again, all of them have been quite user-friendly, and pretty much do things like installation automatically.

So what would I be getting into with Slack? I don't mind doing things manually (in fact, I usually prefer it)....just as long as I have access to the necessary knowledge/procedures.....

So can someone please explain what package installation entails in Slack?

(I currently have AntiX on my "experimental" partition.....it's a pretty decent OS, but I'm freaked-out by the fact that the guy behind it is a Marxist- and uses his software to propagate that political philosophy. I don't care to support that any more so than I want to support Microsoft)
 
Old 04-15-2014, 08:45 PM   #2
dive
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,467

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Yes it's correct that there is no auto dependency resolution. Many of us use slackbuilds.org for installing extra software, and that site will have listed all the required and optional dependencies needed.

If you want to build something that isn't in on slackbuilds.org, alienBob's or rworkman's repos then usually the output from ./configure will tell you it needs something.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 09:06 PM   #3
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
In addition to what dive posted, you can use tools like sbopkg together with sqg to automatically install packages from Slackbuilds.org with their listed dependencies, so that (if you want) you have some kind of automatic dependency resolution.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 09:12 PM   #4
moisespedro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,223

Rep: Reputation: 195Reputation: 195
I suggest you reading this and, to be honest, with slackpkg+ and sbopkg I can still pretty much everything I need.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 09:23 PM   #5
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,564
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117Reputation: 2117
Honestly, try not to think too much about it.

Slackware already comes with a lot of software libraries and packages that resolve a lot of dependencies from the SlackBuilds website.

Slackbuilds.org also lists and links to any prerequisite dependencies needed by a package, so you'll know exactly what you need.

You should also create a SBO-List.txt file in your root directory folder to track any SBo packages you install so you can tell what is installed in case a package is a dependency of another.

Manual dependency resolution is not that bad. Once you get used to it, it becomes second nature to you.
 
Old 04-15-2014, 09:29 PM   #6
frankbell
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu MATE, Mageia, and whatever VMs I happen to be playing with
Posts: 19,590
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221Reputation: 6221
I normally use the repositories that dive mentioned above.

When I started with Slackware, slackbuilds.org did not exist, but there were a few websites that provided Slackware packages. Mostly, though, I compiled from sources. It's not as intimidating as it sounds.

If you are compiling from sources, error messages will tell you what dependency(ies) is missing.

I have to say that I do not really miss searching for dependencies on the web, but, at the time it was kind of fun. And it was a darned good learning experience.

Don't be afraid of Slackware; it's not the monster that some persons seem to think it is. Out of the box, it gives you a full-featured software install with programs to do just about anything you might want to do, and, when you start to customize it, you will find that it is a damned fine teacher.

I started with Slackware. Since then, I've used lots of distros (I'm typing this on Debian while I watch an old television show on Mageia over there, on the other computer on this desk).

Wherever I wander, though, I always seem to come back to the elegant simplicity of Slackware--the Distro of Iron, that always works and never breaks.

Last edited by frankbell; 04-15-2014 at 09:33 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-15-2014, 09:36 PM   #7
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Well, thanks, everyone!

And FrankBell, you know, since it will not be my primary OS; and since I really have been wanting something which will force me to learn more (I had even mentioned that in another thread, some time ago- and a few people- probably including you, mentioned that Slack would be right up my alley)

I may just taske the plunge, and give it a try.

(I just ordered a copy of The Collector from Amazon..... too lazy to post that fact in the "old Movie" thread!)
 
Old 04-15-2014, 10:00 PM   #8
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,765

Rep: Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863Reputation: 1863
I would suggest you to have a look on my blog post about resolving dependencies for packages in SBo project using sbopkg + sqg. It's very easy to do
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-15-2014, 10:44 PM   #9
coldbeer
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Orion–Cygnus Arm, MWG
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu
Posts: 249

Rep: Reputation: 130Reputation: 130
The other thing you're not considering is that with other distributions, you start with a minimalist system and then you have to install everything yourself. Yes it is easy to install things but you install what you want, not what you need. So every time you turn around, you need to install something else. Its endless. And you pay dearly for that easy install with config files chopped up and scattered such that the original application developers documentation is worthless to you.

Slackware starts with nearly everything you need. So the amount of software you need to install is minimal. Slackware follows the file hierarchy standard. The applications included are setup as the developer intended and their documentation is fully applicable. And unlike those minimal systems, when you do need to download source and compile it, you've got all the compiler tools already there.

My $0.02
 
Old 04-15-2014, 11:40 PM   #10
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by willysr View Post
I would suggest you to have a look on my blog post about resolving dependencies for packages in SBo project using sbopkg + sqg. It's very easy to do
Will do! (Just hope I understand it- It's been my experience that a lot of such things are written for the benefit of people who are more advanced than I). Then again, I'm also the type who will dive-in and give it a try, and figure out what I don't understand, as I go.

Quote:
Originally Posted by coldbeer View Post
The other thing you're not considering is that with other distributions, you start with a minimalist system and then you have to install everything yourself. Yes it is easy to install things but you install what you want, not what you need. So every time you turn around, you need to install something else. Its endless. And you pay dearly for that easy install with config files chopped up and scattered such that the original application developers documentation is worthless to you.

Slackware starts with nearly everything you need. So the amount of software you need to install is minimal. Slackware follows the file hierarchy standard. The applications included are setup as the developer intended and their documentation is fully applicable. And unlike those minimal systems, when you do need to download source and compile it, you've got all the compiler tools already there.

My $0.02
Interesting. On the one hand, I like the minimalistic systems because I really don't need a lot of software. They give me a fully functional system, and I just have to install a few necesseties. I tend to avoid the "big systems" with a lot of bloat, because I never use 97% of the things offer- and yet still have to install my necesseties. I'm glad you said what you did, because i may have looked at Slack and thought of it as bloated; but now i won't look at it as bloat, but rather, like you said, as an integrated whole that is designed to work at it's best.

Thanks again, to everyone. I'm learning!
 
Old 04-16-2014, 12:10 AM   #11
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware (desktops), Void (thinkpad)
Posts: 7,417

Rep: Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833Reputation: 3833
Further to the above, excellent posts I suggest that you do a full install of Slackware. A full install of Slackware works out of the box with all dependencies met.
After you're up and running you can install stuff from the above-mentioned repositories and web-sites.
Happy Slacking.
 
Old 04-16-2014, 01:20 AM   #12
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Good advice, Hitest; I'll take it!

Guys, ya know......sometimes fear of the unknown is the biggest obstacle! I always imagined that compiling was some kind of computer-programming-esque feat only for supernerds....

I just took a quick look-see on Youtube (I should be in bed...but I like this stuff!!!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7_5zsaQlFE

DAYUMMmmm!!! That's it? That's all there is to it? That's what I've been living in fear of for years?

Is that really all that is to it?????

I feel like such a tool! So...compiling isn't the boogeyman that I had imagined it to be?

G'night everyone, and thanks for the encouragement!
 
Old 04-16-2014, 02:03 AM   #13
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: distro hopper
Posts: 11,339

Rep: Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380Reputation: 5380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumguy View Post
What's all this I hear about having to resolve dependencies manually?
It's really a misconception.

Most of us build our Slackware packages using scripts from SlackBuilds.org. The descriptions of each script on SlackBuilds.org lists its dependencies.

SlackBuilds.org has a frontend called sbopkg. Sbopkg lets you create queues of packages to build and install in order. That helps.

And then there are tools like sqg, which automatically parse the SlackBuilds.org "database" and build the queues for you. After you run it and have your queues generated, you can do "sbopkg -i ffmpeg", or "sbopkg -i ffmpeg -k" if you don't want packages you already have installed rebuilt, to install ffmpeg and all its dependencies.

Furthermore, the "lack" of dependency resolution doesn't lock you down to package versions the way other distributions do. Want to install a new version of nginx? Just get the SlackBuild and a newer nginx source tarball, and use the SlackBuild script to build and install the newer version. You can upgrade almost all packages that way, including those that are part of Slackware. If you're worried about this causing problems with library conflicts, well, in practice it never does.

A full install of Slackware is designed to make this process as easy as possible, by including most of the dependencies that you're going to need.

Yes, the overall process is still more involved and time-consuming than on other distros. To me, the gain in control is worth it, and the workflow is more than efficient enough.

Last edited by dugan; 04-16-2014 at 02:20 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-16-2014, 10:33 AM   #14
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
It's really a misconception.

Most of us build our Slackware packages using scripts from SlackBuilds.org. The descriptions of each script on SlackBuilds.org lists its dependencies.

SlackBuilds.org has a frontend called sbopkg. Sbopkg lets you create queues of packages to build and install in order. That helps.

And then there are tools like sqg, which automatically parse the SlackBuilds.org "database" and build the queues for you. After you run it and have your queues generated, you can do "sbopkg -i ffmpeg", or "sbopkg -i ffmpeg -k" if you don't want packages you already have installed rebuilt, to install ffmpeg and all its dependencies.

Furthermore, the "lack" of dependency resolution doesn't lock you down to package versions the way other distributions do. Want to install a new version of nginx? Just get the SlackBuild and a newer nginx source tarball, and use the SlackBuild script to build and install the newer version. You can upgrade almost all packages that way, including those that are part of Slackware. If you're worried about this causing problems with library conflicts, well, in practice it never does.

A full install of Slackware is designed to make this process as easy as possible, by including most of the dependencies that you're going to need.

Yes, the overall process is still more involved and time-consuming than on other distros. To me, the gain in control is worth it, and the workflow is more than efficient enough.
You know? With all these great explanations, it's actually beginning to sound rather easy!

A Youtube review of Slackware which I was watching last night basically said the same thing too, about the fredom of choice in updating selectively- and I LOVE that feature! My whole computing life, I've always avoided doing updates, until absolutely positively necessary- I always hated the idea of clicking a button and sitting there helplessly as thousands of different things just get changed whether you like it or not.

I like having control (I'd much rather drive a stick than an automatic)- and these days especially, where often, just doing something manually, is often actually much easier than trying to "trick" some automated system into doing what you want it to.

I basically operate under the idea that if I have a good-working system, there should be little need to modify it. i.e. the idea of always keeping my OS "current" is anathema to me; I like to install something, and, if it works good, just leave it alone until and if there is some actual need to change it. Sounds like Slackware is made for me!

My greatest fear now, is that I'll likely install so little software, that on the rare occasion that I do need to install something, I'll probably have folrgotten how to do it! (Even on my minimal systems, I basically install Emilia Pinball; an audio tagger [and that is likely unnecessary- I could probably just learn to do what I need to do with a terminal script); Xiphos; and maybe an alternate browser and email client (And I'm thinking of switching to MUTT for email...so that should be easy!).

Oh, I think I'm going to like Slackware. If I remember correctly, even though it's a big distro, it should still work on my 7 year-old POS 'puter, eh?

For some reason, I had been laboring under the idea that Slack was some kind of erector-set OS, where you basically had to build an OS from scratch- installing and tweaking every little thing- even the most basic utilities. Sounds like that is definitely not the case.

Methinks I'll be burning an ISO tonight!
 
Old 04-16-2014, 10:35 AM   #15
Sumguy
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Rural Kentucky, USA.
Distribution: BunsenLabs Linux
Posts: 465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
...and this thread will make a handy point of reference for me, for all the links in youse guyses[sic] signatures!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] MySQL & Slack 12.2 problems with getting the thing to run... lpallard Linux - Server 2 03-03-2010 07:10 PM
LXer: Are You Afraid...? You Will Be... LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-17-2009 04:00 AM
Why I am afraid to use Linux (some help please) old6598 General 1 04-07-2007 05:45 AM
about KDE i'm afraid ;) yoron Slackware 2 01-18-2006 01:04 PM
Afraid I Have Been Compromised robpom Linux - Security 12 03-31-2005 12:50 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration