SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Has anyone investigated what these script errors in the VMware installer are and what in Slackware is causing them to appear?
It's not really clear what is happening because the installer script silence's the output, until something fails then it just prints that the install failed.
I wish I didn't have to use VMware, but there are still a lot of vmware vm's at work so this is a necessary evil. I have started to convert our infrastructure to KVM is hopefully when its all converted I can ditch vmware entirely.
No interest. Not rich enough to waste money on VMware Workstation.
The free-beer VMware Player has the same issues and it would be nice to have it work on Slackware out of the box.
Quote:
For qemu / VirtualBox at least the users can participate in development. With VMware no way, no chance.
Well, not really. VirtualBox is completely controlled by Oracle and it's inferior to VMware. Qemu is either a very slow emulator or just a frontend to Linux KVM and not a cross-platform virtualization solution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by /dev/random
It's not really clear what is happening because the installer script silence's the output, until something fails then it just prints that the install failed.
It creates log files somewhere. I remember VMware once working flawlessly on Slackware 12 or 13. And it still works, if you run the installer with -I, so it can only be a minor issue (like some command behaving slightly different). Once it's fixed, it should stop these threads popping up all the time...
The free-beer VMware Player has the same issues and it would be nice to have it work on Slackware out of the box.
I did try VMware Player (see my older posts in another thread). There was some problem with the usb arbitrator. But since it's closed source software, why do we spend 100 times time and resource doing debugging for WMware for free, and boost VMware's market while WMware itself can do it much more easily with source code at hand?
If VMware makes our debugging unnecessarily harder and it gains benefit from our debugging, then VMware should pay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsn
Well, not really. VirtualBox is completely controlled by Oracle and it's inferior to VMware. Qemu is either a very slow emulator or just a frontend to Linux KVM and not a cross-platform virtualization solution.
When something is wrong with VirtualBox you can post a patch on Oracle's bug tracker. In this way you can benefit everyone else with little effort. This how open source makes the community more efficient.
And ... why is qemu not a cross-platform virtualization solution? It is obviously much more cross-platform than VMware.
When something is wrong with VirtualBox you can post a patch on Oracle's bug tracker. In this way you can benefit everyone else with little effort. This how open source makes the community more efficient.
I won't help Oracle by sending them patches for free, they don't deserve it. The USB 2.0 support in VBox is not open source and USB 3.0 support is completely missing.
BTW: I'm just fine with good proprietary application software, that's why I'm using Opera and Steam. So the VBox license is completely irrelevant to me. If VBox improves and beats VMware feature-wise, then I consider it. Currently it is just not there.
Quote:
why is qemu not a cross-platform virtualization solution?
Qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer. The hypervisor is KVM-only. I have no use for emulators, they are too slow.
I won't help Oracle by sending them patches for free, they don't deserve it.
I do not like Oracle either but because their bug tracker and VirtualBox are open, I can also help other users when I post a patch, not only Oracle.
Also, when Oracle takes our work, there is no loss from either. VMware however, wastes our time if we do debugging for their closed source programs. Why should anyone waste his/her time when this overhead can be completely avoided with open source?
When you help Oracle, your cost and their gain is 1:1. When helping VMware, this ratio can be 100:1 or more. So why help VMware? (Note: I didn't say "why not help Oracle".)
As you said, VMware is more powerful. The powerful needs no aid. It shows you it needs no aid by closing its source. Please don't disgrace VMware by helping it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsn
The USB 2.0 support in VBox is not open source and USB 3.0 support is completely missing.
Ok, then you have a very special use case -- to use USB 3.0 in the guest.
BTW
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsn
: I'm just fine with good proprietary application software, that's why I'm using Opera and Steam. So the VBox license is completely irrelevant to me.
I also use opera. I have good feelings with it, but I don't fix bugs for opera, just like I don't fix bugs for VMware. Life is limited. No waste of time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsn
Qemu is an emulator, not a virtualizer. The hypervisor is KVM-only. I have no use for emulators, they are too slow.
Ok, so you are a MS-Windows user. Then I understand, qemu is not good for you. However, that kvm is not ported to MS-Windows doesn't mean it is not portable.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.