LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-04-2013, 02:31 PM   #46
Woodsman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 3,254

Rep: Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481Reputation: 481

I'm still using 32-bit. I have a mix of old and newish hardware. I could mix 64-bit and 32-bit, but then my maintenance doubles to support both. Easier for me to just support 32-bit. Note: I have run 64-bit and I have some 64-bit partitions here, but the doubled maintenance wears me out.

I've tinkered with the idea of starting a side business refurbishing computer systems with Linux based software. I live in a rural area and like many rural areas, many folks are not super rich. They tend to hang on to appliances and hardware, including computers. Around here, moving to 64-bit as the only offering eliminates Slackware as an option for such a side business.

There also remains a handful of apps that don't run in 64-bit or are not properly packaged for 64-bit. Multilibs is not a solution for all people and many don't want the overhead. Possibly if multilibs was part of the stock 64-bit Slackware that could change. Yet as Eric noted, a 32-bit system is needed to create the multilibs package.

Thanks for asking.
 
Old 02-04-2013, 02:44 PM   #47
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, SLAX, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,585

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
Three out of my six machines have 32-bit CPUs, two of them are older Toshiba laptops. Although my two main machines are 64-bit, I therefore do have a need for 32-bit Slackware.

gargamel
 
Old 02-04-2013, 02:47 PM   #48
jamesf
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware 12 and higher
Posts: 207

Rep: Reputation: 40
3 Dell C810s, one Dell C840, some Dell GX240s, and a Dell 420SC. I have no 64-bit hardware available to me.
 
Old 02-04-2013, 03:13 PM   #49
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,112

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I have n Asus Eeepc 1000h netbook which will run 32-bit Slackware forever. I run a 32-bit Slackware virtual machine because my Half-Life Dedicated Server requires a 32-bit OS. I use multilib on my laptop and desktop because of the Steam game platform, Skype and Citrix Receiver I use every day. Who says 32-bit Slackware is going away?

Eric
 
Old 02-04-2013, 09:23 PM   #50
Paulo2
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Distribution: Slackware current(32) (started with 13.37(32))
Posts: 86

Rep: Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
Coincidentally, we discussed this topic internally, this week. The general consensus was that 32-bit Slackware is not yet going away.

Eric
Another big thank you! My desktop is a Sempron circa 2004 running very smooth with XFCE.
 
Old 02-04-2013, 10:29 PM   #51
vivanguarda
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Location: RJ-Brazil
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 166

Rep: Reputation: 4
Sorry for later! I am using seven machines on 13.37 / 32 bits system and tde 3.5. Asus A8v and k8n motherboards.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 03:12 AM   #52
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware14.1 x64(Workstation), Antix MX-14 x32(Netbook), CentOS5/6 (Servers)
Posts: 650

Rep: Reputation: 78
Voices from southern region of the Asian continent:- Even if I'll purchase another powerful machine with more than 4GB of RAM and a modern CPU for a 64 bit OS, I'll keep using 32-bit on my old machines with lesser RAMs and slow CPUs as long as it's out there in the wild. Practicality, you see.
Thanks guys for taking the feedback from users. Hail Slackware.

Regards.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 05:27 AM   #53
Slax-Dude
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Valadares, Portugal
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 214

Rep: Reputation: 58
Except for servers (at home and at work) all my computers run 32bit.
They don't have that recent hardware, have less than 4Gb RAM and run some software that is only available in 32bit.
Although some of them have 64bit capable CPUs, I don't see the point in having multilib on them (low RAM).
 
Old 02-05-2013, 06:50 AM   #54
yars
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2012
Location: Russia
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 120

Rep: Reputation: 11
My primary desktop is Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz, 512 Mb RAM, Gigabyte GA-81PE1000, NVIDIA GeForce FX5200, HDD 160 Gb SATA Seagate ST3160812AS. I use Slackware 14 with Xfce.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 10:10 AM   #55
n1x4
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2013
Distribution: Salckware
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Custom build (main): AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE w/ 16gb RAM == 64bit + XFCE
Dell Dimension 8110 Desktop (secondary): Pentium 4 3.06 Ghz CPU+HT w/ 2gb RAM == 32bit + XFCE
HP Pavilion XT858 Desktop (home server): Pentium 3 (coppermine) 1Ghz CPU w/ 384mb RAM == 32bit
Sony VAIO PCG-GRT390z Laptop (pen-tester): Pentium 4 2.66 Ghz CPU w/ 1.5 gb RAM == 32 bit + DWM

Short answer. Some of my hardware is only 32bit.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 10:21 AM   #56
TSquaredF
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: "The South Coast of Texas"
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 488
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 55
Why does everyone seem to think that if Slackware-NEW is 64-bit only that all support for 32 bits in Slackware will disappear? The old hardware "in the world" will not get upgraded any more, so why the OS? Slackware32-14 works well, so those who need it should use it. That may require a long commitment by Pat to security updates, but that has been routine for ever.
Regards,
Bill
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-05-2013, 11:18 AM   #57
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,231

Rep: Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828Reputation: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
Who says 32-bit Slackware is going away?

Eric
Er... You did, or at least suggested it was under consideration:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob View Post
The problem is: when we asked who still uses 32-bit Slackware the silence was deafening. Now that I talk about possible farewell to 32-bit Slackware everybody starts telling they still use 32-bit Slackware/

People if you still need it, you need to make yourself heard when we ask for your opinions!

Eric

I give up. This place is getting a little too surreal for me.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 11:42 AM   #58
larrybpsu
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Uniontown PA, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 25

Rep: Reputation: 7
I was never aware of the original question about letting 32-bit Slack.

If Pat or the group has a serious question for the masses, PLEASE ask the Slackware subscription folks via email. I've been a loyal Slacker for many, many years, and this issue makes me shake my head....

DO NOT EXPECT a Twitter comment to get valuable or significant responses. Talk 'to' people, not 'at' them.

Yes. I still use 32-bit Slackware. Installed 14.0 on my old Pentium Pro SMP box. Works damn well, and used the stock CD kernel. No problems. I have a total of 12 running systems that are 32-bit only. I have another 6 systems that are AMD and running 64-bit Slack.

If some issue out there would cause the passing of either version of Slackware....Linux (not just Slackware) is in big trouble.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-05-2013, 12:00 PM   #59
tuubaaku
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Slackware, Scientific Linux
Posts: 103

Rep: Reputation: 15
Another user here running on 32-bit. I guess it's because I want to still be able to run Skype & Wine, and I'm not real familiar with the multi-lib setup and haven't tested things on 64-bit.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 12:47 PM   #60
ottavio
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 312

Rep: Reputation: 46
I would like to see more attention given to the ARM branch and to small devices (tablets, smartphones). In my view the ARM branch should be the main platform for any given Linux distro and the Intel 32/64 should follow suit.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KRDC not allowing vnc sessions with 32 bit Slackware 14.0. OK on 64 bit vdemuth Slackware 1 10-06-2012 03:13 AM
Slackware 13.1 32 & 64 bit Post-Install issues in VMWARE Slackn00ber Linux - Newbie 8 09-09-2012 06:30 PM
Wine 32 bit on Slackware 13 64 bit problems: configure can't find some libraries ozanbaba Slackware 28 11-26-2010 02:42 PM
[SOLVED] ati driver 32-bit compatibility for Slackware 64-bit multilib? vik Slackware 25 02-16-2010 07:06 PM
LXer: Microsoft! needs! Yahoo! developers! developers! developers! LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-01-2008 11:40 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration