LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-21-2005, 11:46 PM   #1
cry0x
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Archlinux 0.7
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
Upgraded to 2.6.9


I've been running slack 10.1 for about a week now... I've recompiled the default kernel a few times to learn about how it works and such (new to linux.) Yesterday I decided to upgrade to the 2.6.9 kernel, just to see (and because I wanted nice SATA suppport.)

So I follow the directions from the sticky on this page. Everything is fine, and I can boot. I install my nvidia drivers, and viola, pretty gdm screen. But a few problems:


1) My USB Mouse is not working
2) My hard drives are not DMA
3) NTFS "not supported by kernel" --?? It's clearly in the filesystem options... Should I make it a module instead of built-in?


And just a few questions: When I compile the kernel with my sound card driver (emu10k) as a module, ALSAconf sees it fine, and all is well.
But when I compile the kernel with emu10k built in, ALSA cannot see the card. Is there something I need to change somewhere?


As for the 1,2, and 3 above, can someone tell me the correct kernel options I need to activate to get these things to work?


I know I can just roll back to the 2.4.26 kernel and wash my hands of 2.6, but I'd like to figure this out and get it working, THEN I can roll back kernels (if I so desire.)

Any help is GREATLY appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Old 02-22-2005, 04:30 AM   #2
keefaz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 6,552

Rep: Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872Reputation: 872
Maybe a tip :

- Run make menuconfig, then type : "/" followed by <enter>
- In the search field, type "mouse" then <enter>,
- after that type "dma" then <enter>

For the 3) I would think it is better to compile it as module
 
Old 02-22-2005, 05:43 AM   #3
egag
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,721

Rep: Reputation: 53
some time ago it was adviced on the alsa website, to build alsa as modules
rather than compile them into the kernel. (...all kinds of bugs could appear )
i don't know if that's still valid but reading your story i think it is.
anyway, i always build it as modules.

and the same for the ntfs. try to make it modular.
and it's always a good advice to solve the prob's, so you know how to handle those things.

egag
 
Old 02-22-2005, 12:20 PM   #4
cry0x
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Archlinux 0.7
Posts: 24

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thanks guys.


I'll try that later tomorrow night, when I get a chance.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just upgraded to Slack 10.1... digitalhead General 9 03-31-2005 11:15 PM
Just upgraded to 9 and... Finlay Slackware 2 05-28-2003 11:58 AM
Upgraded kernel to 2.4.13 jeremy LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 11-17-2001 09:38 PM
Upgraded kernel to 2.4.10 jeremy LQ Suggestions & Feedback 1 09-25-2001 12:08 PM
Kernel upgraded to 2.4.7 jeremy LQ Suggestions & Feedback 2 08-01-2001 03:23 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration