Latest LQ Deal: Linux Power User Bundle
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.


  Search this Thread
Old 08-22-2008, 06:51 PM   #16
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Roc City (Rochester-NY)
Distribution: Slacker 4 Life
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 15

I don't have a installkernel executable on my machine, yet "make install" has never failed me. "make help" also says it will install to $INSTALL_PATH if no installkernel exists. From the Makefile:

# INSTALL_PATH specifies where to place the updated kernel and system map
# images. Default is /boot, but you can set it to other values
export  INSTALL_PATH ?= /boot
So again, it seems "make install" just does the copying for me without the issue of fat finger problems. Unless I'm missing something.
Old 08-22-2008, 07:07 PM   #17
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 4,431
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888Reputation: 1888
If I remember rightly, the idea behind make install was that you have a /boot/vmlinuz and a /boot/vmlinuz.old image setup in you /etc/lilo.conf and make install would manage them for you. That would allow you to go back to the previous kernel if you new kernel failed to boot. The only problem with it is if something goes wrong and you run make install a second time without thinking it'll overwrite the vmlinuz.old with the bad one. I used to do it that way back in the old days. But now, I just keep a static entry for the shipped/default huge kernel as my backup boot option.
Old 08-22-2008, 07:59 PM   #18
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,390

Rep: Reputation: 409Reputation: 409Reputation: 409Reputation: 409Reputation: 409
nothing wrong with make install, but I prefer to copy the 2 files by hand, like treating them with care and love, not handled by a cold automated script I use grub bootloader anyway, so not interested by the lilo update....
Old 08-22-2008, 08:04 PM   #19
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Portland,ME.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 102

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15

ok i got everything sorted out.lastime i used make install i got a bunch of errors,but then again im new at this!
thanks for all the input!


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can't compile kernel ERROR: no /sbin/init found on rootdev tommcd Slackware 18 11-24-2007 09:32 PM
# /sbin/lilo returns incorrect error message Bruce Hill Slackware 5 11-24-2004 02:29 PM
Upgraded kernel, lilo.conf, didn't run /sbin/lilo dtashima Linux - Newbie 4 10-18-2004 11:21 AM
SuSE kernel update /sbin/lilo hindenbergbaby Linux - Newbie 3 12-05-2003 12:11 PM
new kernel causes lilo crash; /sbin/lilo = Warning: device 0x0305 exceeds 1024 cylind dandysf Linux - Software 0 08-26-2003 04:50 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration