Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
08-05-2006, 11:29 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: India
Distribution: Slackware, Back|track, Fedora, ubuntu
Posts: 167
Rep:
|
transition to slack for a newbie
Hi, i'm a newbie using slackware 10.2, this is the 1st time i tried slack, & i noticed its very different frm other distros (i've tried ubuntu,RH9,fedora in the past)
the 1st thing i noticed is there isn't any logo or a wallpaper or an icon not even a name in the loader(lilo) that mentions slackware!
i've seen many fans of slack in this website, what is abt it that stands out?
|
|
|
08-05-2006, 11:38 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: In my house.
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 64bit, Slackware 13.1 64-bit
Posts: 2,649
Rep:
|
Wow. Loaded question.
The short answer: You.
You make Slackware what it is. It is maintain by a individual ("All Hail Pat!") but you change it into what you want.
Have you noticed that it does not even start X as a default? You have to configure it, and start it.
EVERYTHING in Slackware is customizable, all the way to making it unusable.
Toy with it. Change it. Make it yours.
Then try one of your old distros. You'll be saying "Why can't I..." or "Hey, I can do...". Slackware shows you how Linux works, shows you the guts of the OS, and makes you dig in elbows deep in the muck and the mire.
As I said, You are what this distro is about. Make it yours.
|
|
|
08-05-2006, 11:53 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Rep:
|
Slackware is different. Depending on your own personal tastes, you might find this either good or bad. I would say that it doesn't matter whether you use Slackware or Fedora so long as you're comfortable with the OS.
Slackware is popular because of the simplicity of the default init scripts and the way the configuration files are laid out to make editing by hand easy. Other distros tend to write their own scripts to generate conf files while Slackware leaves everything to the user. It makes adminning a system much easier when you know what goes where and it's very easy to customize the boot sequence on Slackware to leave out unwanted stuff (just make the particular rc.<whatever> script unexecutable).
On the other hand, unless you're willing to risk compiling from source (and believe me while it works 90% of the time, there are some software that will fail to compile on your system for a variety of reasons which might be fixable or not) or use third-party packages, you might find the selection of software on the main distribution a bit thin compared to other major distros. There's also no auto dependency checking so you deal with installing dependencies by hand as well.
|
|
|
08-06-2006, 01:10 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharathg786
the 1st thing i noticed is there isn't any logo or a wallpaper or an icon not even a name in the loader(lilo) that mentions slackware!
|
That's because Pat loves simplicity, too, and leaves things the
way their creators made them. (well, there's a couple of sanity
patches for software that is no longer maintained by their owner).
Cheers,
Tink
|
|
|
08-06-2006, 01:19 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300
Rep:
|
In a nutshell pretty much every Slack system is more or less a custom system. It's up to the user to set things up the way they want it to be.
Except for a couple of neccessary patches, Slack is a vanilla distro, leaving it up to the user to make whatever changes they want to make to get it to the system they want.
Simplicity is a beautiful thing.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|