Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
03-28-2006, 08:19 PM
|
#16
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 18
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cathectic
The problem with upgrading aaa*, is that the upgrade notes assume you are going from one release to the next (e.g. 10.1 to 10.2).
In this case, aaa* is not a problem, since you will upgrade it, and then overwrite all the files it installs with the proper libraries.
However, if you are tracking -current, installing aaa* will overwrite all those nice libraries you have and won't get overwritten since you are not upgrading/ reinstalling every package. Hence the warning is in the -current ChangeLog, but not in UPGRADE.TXT
|
thanks cathectic that explains some of it for me,although isn't aaa_elflibs the only one he states shouldn't be upgraded? aaa-base just say's that it should never be uninstalled..or am i missing something.last time i upgraded aaa.elflibs was the last time he had it for upgrade in current..which was feb 9..which reads like so
a/aaa_elflibs-10.2.0-i486-4.tgz: Added /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 ->
/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 symlink, needed by Oracle 10g RAC support.
Thanks to Luigi Genoni.
Upgraded various other libraries.
so if he upgraded various other libraries along with adding the libgcc-s.so.1 symlink..wouldn't they be the newest version of said libraries?just wondering how it could downgrade libraries if the package is newer ..
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 01:29 PM
|
#17
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606
Rep:
|
Making a list like this doesn't really help anybody. It's just a little bit pretentious.
You're posting your personal experiences as if they are the greatest possible to people who could have very different needs than you.
Also, You recommend Gware and Freerock without providing ANY reasons. I guarantee that you have not used all three, so it is a little bit, jackass like, to recommend a gnome provider WITHOUT providing any rational reasons behind it, other than elitist reasons of, "I use it so it is the best."
If you used Dropline as much as Freerock you would clearly see why so many people use it. It's stupid to assume that everybody has the exact same needs as you.
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 02:08 PM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 150
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
Making a list like this doesn't really help anybody. It's just a little bit pretentious.
|
It is not very kind to burn down someone's good work like this.
The part you seem to have the most problems is:
Quote:
6. If you want to use GNOME, try Freerock GNOME or GWARE. There is also Dropline GNOME which is very nice, but I tend to use Freerock.
|
Seems very reasonable and well-intentioned to me. It just points out the options that are available to newcomers, without being unfair to one of the projects. I don't see much pretentiousness.
Last edited by danieldk; 03-29-2006 at 02:09 PM.
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 02:15 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware and OpenBSD
Posts: 740
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by liquidtenmilion
Making a list like this doesn't really help anybody. It's just a little bit pretentious.
|
 It is? That sure as heck wasn't the intent. I was just trying to be helpful. So many people here in the Slackware LQ forums have helped me directly and indirectly that I was trying to return the favor. If you knew me, and of course you don't, then you'd know that I am one of the least pretentious people around. But, if it came across that way, then I apologize.
Quote:
You're posting your personal experiences as if they are the greatest possible to people who could have very different needs than you.
|
Well, sure. They are _my_ tips. And they are just "tips," nothing more, nothing less. YMMV.
Quote:
Also, You recommend Gware and Freerock without providing ANY reasons. I guarantee that you have not used all three, so it is a little bit, jackass like, to recommend a gnome provider WITHOUT providing any rational reasons behind it, other than elitist reasons of, "I use it so it is the best."
|
In keeping with the "tips" idea, they were supposed to be just little nuggets. I have used all three GNOME variants, actually, notwithstanding your guarantee. In fact, I think I said that only "tend" to use Freerock. I have Freerock on one box and Dropline on another box. As to my reasoning, Freerock is just a little easier to uninstall if someone wants to do so. So when I've set up other Slackware boxes, unless someone is a diehard GNOME fan, I "tend" to install Freerock. But not always. It ain't like it's my religion or anything.
Quote:
If you used Dropline as much as Freerock you would clearly see why so many people use it. It's stupid to assume that everybody has the exact same needs as you.
|
Hmmm... I don't recall making any such assumption. They're just _my_ tips based on my experience.
I welcome discussion on the substantive points themselves -- that was why I posted it -- to elicit feedback; however, I do not appreciate the "stupid" characterization.
Last edited by chess; 03-29-2006 at 10:19 PM.
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 07:15 PM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,348
|
Quote:
Upgrade packages from -current on a very selective or as-needed basis,
|
I might actually amend this statement to read "if you want to run anything from -current, run all of current". Piecemeal updates will cause problems eventually.
I realize "very selective" may cover this.
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 09:19 PM
|
#21
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware and OpenBSD
Posts: 740
Original Poster
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franklin
I might actually amend this statement to read "if you want to run anything from -current, run all of current". Piecemeal updates will cause problems eventually.
I realize "very selective" may cover this.
|
That's a good point -- thanks! I'll edit it and add that.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|