LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2006, 09:40 AM   #421
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 7,442

Rep: Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867Reputation: 3867
Smile


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinaman

It's really quite a disservice to compare Slackware to Windoze.

One is a stable operating system developed by a man who wants
to provide a good service and hopes for a similar return.

The other is a piece of junk operating system developed by a
lousy thief who wants to rule the world, and could not care
LESS about anyone who buys his POS.
Well-said. Winders is indeed a POS operating system. I am very much looking forward to Pat's newest creation.
Slackware rules!
 
Old 07-26-2006, 09:51 AM   #422
The_Outlander
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 235

Rep: Reputation: 30
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinaman
Since this is just a free-for-all thread, and my previous
post didn't because of my sorry Chinese internet service:

While you still have the choice ...

It's really quite a disservice to compare Slackware to Windoze.

One is a stable operating system developed by a man who wants
to provide a good service and hopes for a similar return.

The other is a piece of junk operating system developed by a
lousy thief who wants to rule the world, and could not care
LESS about anyone who buys his POS.
I guess that this thread has become a "free for all". It's origin is however related to the release of Slackware 11.0.
The Windoze vs Linux debate has been done to death, is an emotional topic and always manages to push a few buttons. Let's stay on track.
I am going back to "0 replies", to see if I can offer assistance to a linux convert, and hopefully prevent them from returning to the clutches of the lousy thief that you refer to.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 09:55 AM   #423
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Arch, Gentoo
Posts: 6,941

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
This thread is a merged bunch of junk, because they got tired of all the whinning and new threads about when Slackware will be released. It should be put in General so that it doesn't elevate post counts.

The reason Pat has Slackware-current is for people who want to help him test packages to go in the next stable release. It's therefore available for others who want to run more up-to-date software, but cannot or will not compile from source for themselves.

I find it quite interesting that Slackware is the only distribution whose followers drool at the mouth waiting for the next stable release.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 11:37 AM   #424
drlouis
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Ne
Distribution: slackware 12 on Dell XPS m1710
Posts: 90

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinaman
Excuse me, but there is absolutely NO comparison to make.

It's not like apples to oranges, it's like watermelon to cow manure.

Your choice ...
o_O I wasn't comparing the OS's, just the costs.

Edit: your link still doesn't work for me.

Last edited by drlouis; 07-26-2006 at 11:40 AM.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 06:36 PM   #425
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,839

Rep: Reputation: 242Reputation: 242Reputation: 242
What's OCD standing for?

Hi,

it may be a bit off-topic, but can anyone tell me, as a non-native English speaker, what "OCD" is standing for?

From the Changelog for Slackware-current as of 2006-07-26: "l/libpng-1.2.12-i486-1.tgz: Upgraded to libpng-1.2.12. The libpng.so has gone .3 -> .0 -> .3. I'll see what I can do about getting everything that's linked to .0 relinked with .3, as that's the major library number Slackware 10.2's libpng.so is using. There is a .0 symlink to keep any code that was compiled while that was the number working just fine, but I will recompile a bunch of things mostly for the sake not using this link. It works either way, but I have an OCD about silly things like this. ;-)"

Thanks! ;-)

gargamel

Last edited by gargamel; 07-26-2006 at 06:38 PM.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 06:43 PM   #426
PsychoticDude85
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Slackware -current - KDE 3.5.10
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 15
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder? As in he feels he has to simplify it? That's my interpretation anyways.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 06:48 PM   #427
guzzi
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Lawrence, KS
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 315

Rep: Reputation: 42
Ocd

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder is the one I suscribe to.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 07:38 PM   #428
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
yeah, it's obsessive compulsive disorder IMHO also.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 07:50 PM   #429
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Arch, Gentoo
Posts: 6,941

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by drlouis
your link still doesn't work for me.
Try it again now. I have the worst ISP in China. I switched
from a static IP to a dynamic IP, and they sometimes assign
me a Class A private IP, so DnyDNS doesn't get the proper
address.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 07:58 PM   #430
zetabill
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Xubuntu
Posts: 348

Rep: Reputation: 32
It's Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. I used to have it when I was younger. I used to wash my hands all the time even if it wasn't necessary. My rationale is that stinky hands would make everything I touched stink as well.

I'm glad that phase of life is over... but I'm still prone to "thoroughness" when it comes to seemingly trivial things.

Sometimes people with OCD provide a vital service in society because they can't live with themselves if things aren't done properly... which makes for exceptional service or products.

Pat's "OCD" reference is that he would rather compile every piece of software in the system and have it use the right library rather than keep the .0 symlink "just to be safe." As he said, the .0 symlink would work just fine but his gut is telling him evil things about it. This is probably why he's so good at making a fine-tuned solid distro.

It's a good thing...

unless you want Slackware 11 tomorrow...
 
Old 07-26-2006, 09:24 PM   #431
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Rep: Reputation: 63
Quote:
I find it quite interesting that Slackware is the only distribution whose followers drool at the mouth waiting for the next stable release
I'd say a good portion of the drooling syndrome occurance is that Pat runs Slack so different than many other distro's.

First off, Pat's ruined gnu/linux for so many by making us Slack junkies out of us.

Secondly, not a week goes bye that you don't have the news-wires or distrowatch amongs other's spamming RSS feeds the universe over that there's a new release candidate out for SuSe, ubuntu, kubuntu, edubuntu or newbuntu. (newbuntu is pronounced newb-buntu, copyright Old_Fogie, LT)

Distrowatch: the ubuntu team is pleased to announce the latest release candidate of newbuntu. According to the changelog, the team has changed the color in the upper half of the desktop blotter icon from blue to off-blue, promissing it to be the best new distro ever and ends world hunger at the same time. This new release candidate is sure to please all who aint gotta clue. According to the to-do list: next week's release candidate will change it back according to inside sources. Don't forget we'll have 18 impartial reviews (actually same guy just 'aliasing') demonstrating it's superiority to any other distro out there.

In other news : debian to release a 64 bit distro sometime when they get arround to it in Decemeber ROFL......or so we hear; and it's gonna be tops!

Whereas Pat releases the 1 to 2 final issues for Slack per year. But his release candidate is allways available, and us Slacker's dont need a web-site, or someone to package it for us.

For me I'd just like to see something else in the news for God's sake.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 09:39 PM   #432
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 32
I don't even understand what you're trying to say. Debian releases are few and far between for a reason, and Slackware doesn't even have ANY official x64 packages, and easy to use != bad.

Windowmaker is easy to use, icewm is easy to use, Gnome is easy to use, Firefox is easy to use, mplayer is easy to use,

Easy to use means it works and works as it is intended and expected to.

And I don't see any "newbuntu" as you say, but I expect that is a joke though, but you're taking a stab at ubuntu by criticizing it for doing things that it actually doesn't do at all.


Quote:
Whereas Pat releases the 1 to 2 final issues for Slack per year. But his release candidate is allways available, and us Slacker's dont need a web-site, or someone to package it for us.
So you're saying that Slackware is better because we have current? If so, you are aware that Mandrake/Ubuntu/Debian/Arch/Gentoo/Suse/FreeBSD/every single distro i've ever used also provide an "unstable"/"current"/"testing" branch too, often much more active than slackware's.

Not to mention that Mandrake is averaging 1 release per year, and Ubuntu is about one every 8 months or so now, and yes, they both have unstable branches for you to use.



I'm not saying anything bad about slackware, I just don't like seeing people bash other distros using incorrect stereotypes.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 09:50 PM   #433
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519

Rep: Reputation: 63
@ liquidtenmilion

LOL internet!!

You entirely missed the whole point of the post. In fact you added to it, mixed it up and threw it in a blender. Please, Please read it in a light-hearted, and "giddy" mind-set.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 09:53 PM   #434
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Fogie
@ liquidtenmilion

LOL internet!!

You entirely missed the whole point of the post. In fact you added to it, mixed it up and threw it in a blender. Please, Please read it in a light-hearted, and "giddy" mind-set.
I know now. I read/responded to an email I got from one of my debian friends right before I saw that post, so my "mindset" so to say was still there.
 
Old 07-26-2006, 10:58 PM   #435
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,816

Rep: Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889Reputation: 1889
to those who runs -current, please take a look on the changelog. Pat has given a lot of updates to -current. Mostly are recompiled packages, due to updates to libpng (one of major library in Slack).

Doh.... it will probably takes 2 days for me to grab all of them because of the slow Internet connection in Indonesia
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
advice, chat, far, general, upgrade


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slack 10.2 slack 10.2 ran xserver after all on sata with via board devafree LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 5 05-31-2006 12:54 AM
Frozen-Bubble(from slack 8.2) Not Running in slack 9 bongski55 Slackware 8 01-02-2006 05:10 PM
Slack 10.1 will a Slack 10 Wine pkg work? acummings Slackware 1 03-25-2005 05:55 AM
Using Slack 10's 2.6.7 kernel packages on Slack 10.1? SocialEngineer Slackware 1 03-05-2005 12:53 PM
cd rom error on installation media (With both slack 9,1 and slack 10) busbarn Slackware - Installation 6 07-15-2004 04:03 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration