LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2003, 01:17 AM   #1
contrasutra
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: New Jersey
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 1,445

Rep: Reputation: 47
supermount


Supermount is a kernel module, right? So it can be added to Slackware? Where can I find the module and is it known to work fine with Slack9.

I love Supermount, I can never remember to mount and umount stuff, and its very frustrating to try to eject a CD and not remember why its not working.

Thanks.
 
Old 04-06-2003, 01:40 AM   #2
carlywarly
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sunny Southport, again.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 0.93 and 0.92, Vector sometimes
Posts: 825

Rep: Reputation: 30
You could try modprobe supermount in a console as root, and see if it initialises. If it does, add it to your init scripts.
 
Old 04-09-2003, 09:13 PM   #3
afunke
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Curitiba - Brazil
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
Please ignore the original content of this message (quoted below). I found out that you can install supermount with non-mandrake kernels too:

1. get latest supermount *patch file for your kernel version
2. copy the file to /usr/src/linux-version
3. run
patch -p1 <supermount.version.patch
4. Configure and turn on "supermount" support under filesystems sections
5. Compile and install the new kernel with supermount support
(read the supermount README to learn how to edit /etc/fstab file and activate supermount after booting the new kernel).

Quote:
AFAIK, supermount is specific to the Mandrake distribution kernel. Even if Mandrake comes with, say, 2.4.21 kernel, it is a "mdk" modified kernel, including the supermount module, which is not available if I download 2.4.21 kernel source from www.kernel.org. Therefore, supermount can not be compiled from any unmodified kernel sources except for kernel sources modified by Mandrake. If you cannot compile it, it is unlikely that it will work with any other distribution (and just copying over kernel modules from another kernel to your system is not a good idea, because of unresolved symbols - remember the DLL nightmare in MS world...).

To tell the truth, even though I use Mandrake 9.0, I decided to uninstall supermount, because it didn't work really well. Lets wait until ML 9.1 users report substantial improvements on supermount performance/stability, so that it can be widely recomended. I think supermount should be an option available at every Linux distribution wanting to seriously compete with that dominant OS on the Desktop market... (it is not easy to reinvent the wheel all the time...)
Andreas

Last edited by afunke; 08-05-2003 at 10:41 AM.
 
Old 07-06-2003, 08:30 PM   #4
gbburkhardt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
You can find the source code for supermount here:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/supermount-ng

It reputes to be platform independent.
 
Old 07-06-2003, 09:20 PM   #5
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Supermount is evil :) ... particularly with
floppies.

As for cd's, do like I, make it a habit to
use
Code:
eject
from a command-line. It either spits out the
CD/DVD or tells you why it won't ;)

Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 07-06-2003, 10:16 PM   #6
gbburkhardt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
I've never had any trouble with supermount, even when Mandrake said it was broken in their 8.1 release. It's one of the main
reasons I prefer Mandrake, and I don't understand why other
distributions haven't seen the light.

I wouldn't be without it, given the choice. The whole 'mount',
'umount' stuff is just too time consuming, and user un-friendly.
 
Old 07-07-2003, 08:46 AM   #7
galad
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Rome, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
It may look user un-friendly but it gives you complete control to what's happening on your machine.
By default only root can mount and umount cd-roms, you can make it easier by editing
/etc/fstab
and adding to the cd-rom line (tipically /dev/cdrom or /dev/hdc) the options:
defaults, umask=022
to make every user able to mount/umount.

Once again, sorry if I wrote something obvious,
greetings
 
Old 07-07-2003, 09:54 AM   #8
tipaul
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Laval, Quebec, Canada
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 15
Cool Easy Mount/Eject of CDROM

I've always used DroplineGnome with my Slack 9...

Just right-clicked on the background and select my drive to mount...

Then when I wish to eject (and unmount) my CD, I just right-click my CD-drive icon and select EJECT...

This is real-easy for me...
 
Old 07-07-2003, 12:27 PM   #9
gbburkhardt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
> It may look user un-friendly but it gives you complete control to > what's happening on your machine.

Having supermount doesn't prevent you from doing this. I can't imagine what "complete control" means with respect to
CDROMs, anyway. With CDROMs, I just want to put the
disc in the drive and use it.

Floppies are a little more complicated, but for an already
formatted floppy, supermount is great. Just put it in and use it.

> By default only root can mount and umount cd-roms, you can
> make it easier by editing /etc/fstab

You can also use the 'user' option in the fstab file.
 
Old 07-07-2003, 01:54 PM   #10
rol1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Any opinions about devfs and devfsd?
 
Old 07-07-2003, 02:59 PM   #11
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Quote:
Any opinions about devfs and devfsd?
How about a fresh thread for that?

Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 07-08-2003, 02:04 AM   #12
moses
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Arizona, US, Earth
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
Posts: 1,152

Rep: Reputation: 50
I use automount. When I do a
Code:
 ls /cdrom
, it mounts /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 at /cdrom and gives me the directory listing. After a couple of minutes of non-use, it umounts /cdrom. Works great with floppies and compact flash cards too. =-}
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
supermount on debian ? Creak Debian 7 01-18-2005 11:15 PM
Supermount vs Submount AxelFendersson Slackware 2 07-15-2004 11:41 PM
Kernel 2.6.6 and Supermount jmw83 Linux - Newbie 2 06-14-2004 06:24 PM
supermount echodoross Linux - Newbie 7 11-05-2003 10:10 PM
supermount and now what? demmylls Linux - General 5 10-13-2003 05:00 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration