LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2017, 02:16 PM   #166
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,212

Rep: Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998

You need to added your mirror testing directory in your /etc/slackpkg/mirrors

Last edited by gmgf; 12-05-2017 at 02:27 PM.
 
Old 12-05-2017, 02:21 PM   #167
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,212

Rep: Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998
sorry double post
 
Old 12-05-2017, 02:23 PM   #168
nobodino
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Near Bordeaux in France
Distribution: slackware, slackware from scratch, LFS, slackware [arm], linux Mint...
Posts: 1,564

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892
tested kernel-4.14.4, not convincing, segfaults as usual (on first boot).
 
Old 12-05-2017, 03:09 PM   #169
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olek View Post
Did You notice that I entered "install testing"?
Code:
slackpkg install testing
Considering that I wrote "testing" why I got packages from slackware/a directory?
It is because of the PRIORITY setting in your /etc/slackpkg/slackpkg.conf file. This sets the order in which it will look for packages. The default is set to patches, %PKGMAIN (which is the original packages in the slackware or slackware64 directory), extra, pasture, and finally testing.

If you want the testing kernels through slackpkg, you'd need to move testing to a higher priority than %PKGMAIN (since patches aren't being used in -current, that option does nothing right now).

Code:
PRIORITY=( testing patches %PKGMAIN extra pasture )
Keep in mind, this will prioritize all of the testing/ packages above the normal install, so in addition to the kernels, you'll also get php-7.2 and efibootmgr-0.6.0. Both of the existing php and efibootmgr packages will be upgraded to the testing versions unless you blacklist them (and then you'll need to keep up with them manually).

And efibootmgr has been in there since the 14.1 development cycle:

Code:
Thu Sep 19 06:48:59 UTC 2013
a/efibootmgr-0.5.4-x86_64-1.txz:  Upgraded.
  Well, reverted to an older version really.  :)  It was reported that
  efibootmgr-0.6.0 was silently failing to actually write the new variables
  to EFI, but that 0.5.4 works.  I'm currently unable to test this here as I'm
  still using DUET UEFI, and changes to the UEFI variables do not persist
  between boots.  I also added a few patches from Fedora's repo that seem
  reasonable to include.  The old (newer) version was moved to /testing in
  case it might work better for someone.
  Thanks to John Yost for the bug report.
 
Old 12-05-2017, 03:40 PM   #170
brobr
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: uk
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 974

Rep: Reputation: 238Reputation: 238Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
Your laptop computer is similar with my mini-PC, which has a Intel Core2 Duo Mobile P8400 and other laptop-like hardware, but in a very small desktop case.

And in that mini-PC the single stable kernels are the 3.9.x series.

P8400 supports virtualisation
and is 64 bit
 
Old 12-05-2017, 03:56 PM   #171
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Thanks you, I know.

But I have only 4GB memory, then I considered better to use 32 bits, to minimize memory consumption.

Not really sure if it is true 100%, but I have the bias that enter more things in the memory of a 32 bits, when you have (less than or) 4GB.

In other hand, I am a 32 bit die-harder, more than you imagine. And saying "die-harder", it is just some soft word to describe.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 12-05-2017 at 04:01 PM.
 
Old 12-05-2017, 04:02 PM   #172
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by nobodino View Post
tested kernel-4.14.4, not convincing, segfaults as usual (on first boot).
I am curious just try next time to do a cold reboot. There is a reason for this. Not a restart but a "shutdown -h now" .

This would point me in a direction.

Reason I say this I could reproduce on a old intel duo. I drug out of the closet. But doing a cold reboot after upgrade did not cause this issue.
let me know.
Waiting for it to freeze pushing it.
 
Old 12-05-2017, 04:05 PM   #173
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Put it in a boot loop.

I mean: leave it to bring up the desktop, then after several minutes, via an script ran on startup by desktop, order a reboot.

I think is the best way to test if your PC is stable or affected by this issue(s).
 
Old 12-05-2017, 07:12 PM   #174
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,661

Rep: Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784
Just found this post about 4.14 regressions: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/15/65
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-05-2017, 11:45 PM   #175
nobodino
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Near Bordeaux in France
Distribution: slackware, slackware from scratch, LFS, slackware [arm], linux Mint...
Posts: 1,564

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892
I tested what suggested Drakeo: cold reboot.
I halted the system.
Cold boot one: ok
Halt the system.
Cold boot two: see the photos, something new
- stall a long time on : [drm] RC6 on
- stall a long time on USB: disconnect
- then segfaulted

There is no improvement since kernel-4.14.0, in my humble opinion, it's even getting worse (?).

nota1: sent from slackware-14.2 with kernel-4.9.67 (rock stable).
nota2: filed a bug on bugzilla.kernel.org: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198091
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_063149-1.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	196.6 KB
ID:	26485   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20171206_063323-2.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	175.5 KB
ID:	26486  

Last edited by nobodino; 12-06-2017 at 12:44 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-06-2017, 03:05 AM   #176
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Worry not, I feel that everything will be fixed until x.y.10, which usually was adopted in the past.

I wonder why...

I propose to all you guys, up to our BDFL: lets take a break and to leave the Kernel guys to do their job, until at least the 4.14.10 is released. You know, just like was in the past.

We can test other things meantime, you know?

Last edited by Darth Vader; 12-06-2017 at 03:24 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-06-2017, 04:40 AM   #177
RadicalDreamer
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64-Current
Posts: 1,816

Rep: Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981Reputation: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
We can test other things meantime, you know?
Like Plasma 5
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-06-2017, 04:44 AM   #178
chrisVV
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2010
Posts: 548

Rep: Reputation: 370Reputation: 370Reputation: 370Reputation: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Vader View Post
But I have only 4GB memory, then I considered better to use 32 bits, to minimize memory consumption.

Not really sure if it is true 100%, but I have the bias that enter more things in the memory of a 32 bits, when you have (less than or) 4GB.
The linux kernel will need to use PAE to address more than about 3GB of memory in practice (try running 'free' with PAE turned off and you will see some of your 4GB disappear). That doesn't mean that a binary with 32-bit pointers might not run faster than a binary of the same program with 64-bit pointers, but using 4GB as your cut-off is somewhat arbitrary.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-06-2017, 04:52 AM   #179
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,212

Rep: Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998Reputation: 998
When kernel-4.9 has ready i have posted:

https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post5651338

the problem was fixed when version 4.9.7 is out

https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post5663540

Last edited by gmgf; 12-06-2017 at 04:58 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-06-2017, 05:26 AM   #180
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadicalDreamer View Post
Like Plasma 5
Ha ha! Why not?

BTW, I plan for this weekend to switch to Plasma5 in one of my computers, then to seriously try to add back enough KDE4 support for, well... I think there is no one who missed for what.

Last edited by Darth Vader; 12-06-2017 at 05:28 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Strange behavior battles Linux - Newbie 5 07-10-2014 08:59 AM
dcgui-qt's strange behavior harken Linux - Software 2 02-24-2005 02:10 PM
Very Strange Behavior raysr Mandriva 4 08-31-2004 02:06 PM
Strange Behavior andrewb758 Linux - Hardware 5 08-31-2003 02:42 PM
strange behavior abhijit Linux - General 3 07-09-2003 11:25 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration