SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I know this is a forum focused on Slackware, but what is much???
I truly have to wonder what you expected when you clicked on the link. You're allowed to yell Yay Bruce a few times How 'bout giving us..... dare I say it..... ummm... well... a little ........................consideration? Yeah, that's it.
That wasn't released until Nov '95, and 0.93R5 in March '95 is probably the first one that we would recognise as being 'debian' as we know it. From the horses mouth: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/p...tailed.en.html
A deliverable debian 'product' came a good while after Slackware's first release -- not that this detracts from debian in any way. Even a year or so after Slackware is still a long time ago, and should be respected as an achievement in its own right.
Anyway, Congrats to Slackware on not dying for yet another year!
One comment says "The oldest surviving distribution, and yet it never lost its identity and its core values". However, it is perhaps more remarkable that the identity and core values were there from the start.
That wasn't released until Nov '95, and 0.93R5 in March '95 is probably the first one that we would recognise as being 'debian' as we know it. From the horses mouth: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/p...tailed.en.html
Ah, a misleading release number, that 0.93. That was the earliest I could find from a quick websearch.
Tonight I did a presentation at the local LUG entitled "Slackware Linux: 21 years and still not tried it? What are you waiting for?"
The slides are here, for anyone that might find it interesting or useful.
Thank you, Eric (Hameleers), Robby (Workman), and many other folks in the Slackware community who have given of their time and effort to add a bit of icing to the cake Pat has baked for us.
Thanks to Jeremy for putting up with all the Slackers hanging around his forums.
Thank you Patrick, Eric, and all slackware community!
it was beautiful distro - distro which who i started my way in linux around 2000 year and slackware 4.0
Tonight I did a presentation at the local LUG entitled "Slackware Linux: 21 years and still not tried it? What are you waiting for?"
The slides are here, for anyone that might find it interesting or useful.
Nice job. How was it received by the audience? Any converts?
No, I doubt there will be converts, but maybe they don't think I'm crazy any more. Or if they do still think I'm crazy, hopefully they won't blame that on Slackware.
Tonight I did a presentation at the local LUG entitled "Slackware Linux: 21 years and still not tried it? What are you waiting for?"
The slides are here, for anyone that might find it interesting or useful.
thanks for sharing this David, I really enjoyed it (fun)!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.