LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2018, 07:19 PM   #31
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,551

Rep: Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569

https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post4660942

 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-03-2018, 08:50 PM   #32
glorsplitz
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Distribution: slackware!
Posts: 655

Rep: Reputation: 130Reputation: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuangTzu View Post
Stable, consistent, boring, gets the job done
+1 this
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 01:28 AM   #33
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys for decades while testing others to keep up
Posts: 2,016

Rep: Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911
Hazel, I have a suggestion that may help you, and I hope, considerably. Most distros are distributed with some sort of Live setup but also most of them are very barebones, just basically a pale cover for a GUI installer. Slack Live, OTOH, is a rather Full System and is a great way to get a feel for how much culture shock you may or may not be in for. The images are easy to install on Optical or Thumbdrives and require not one single permanent change. Highly recommended.

You can find a selection of images sporting different Desktops, including Plasma but versions with Mate or Xfce are also here ====>>>

http://bear.alienbase.nl/mirrors/slackware-live/1.3.0/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 12:02 PM   #34
hazel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: Debian, Crux, LFS, AntiX
Posts: 2,465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan View Post
Hmm! I'm not sure I want to associate myself with a load of 2nd amendment freaks and hillbillies. I'm eccentric but not that sort of eccentric.
 
Old 12-04-2018, 12:07 PM   #35
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 5,613

Rep: Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660Reputation: 1660
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
Hmm! I'm not sure I want to associate myself with a load of 2nd amendment freaks and hillbillies. I'm eccentric but not that sort of eccentric.
Alan Hicks is not a freak or a hillbilly. Hes a Slackware contributor who wrote the Slackbook.
 
4 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 12:12 PM   #36
enorbet
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Virginia
Distribution: Slackware = Main OpSys for decades while testing others to keep up
Posts: 2,016

Rep: Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911Reputation: 1911
Hazel I do hope you noted Dugan's winky. On the linked page he also mentions Eric S. Raymond to whom ALL Linux is indebted. Despite his being a bona fide FREAK! he at least did have a few moments of clarity when he wrote The Cathedral and The Bazaar. If you've ever watched the film Revolution OS you get a glimpse of how eccentric many of the first creators and proponents for Linux were but then again I suppose there are some people in the world who will never visit the amazing Sistine Chapel simply because it was created by "some all-fired flaming faggot! whom God has surely condemned to eternal screaming in the hubs of Hell"

Hopefully for a good chuckle check out this tongue-firmly-in-cheek song regarding Hillbillies/Rednecks

--- Randy Newman - My Old Kentucky Home ---

Last edited by enorbet; 12-04-2018 at 12:27 PM.
 
Old 12-04-2018, 12:16 PM   #37
birdboy
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2018
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
OP, take a look at Void Linux, might be exactly what you're looking for.
 
Old 12-04-2018, 12:32 PM   #38
hazel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: Debian, Crux, LFS, AntiX
Posts: 2,465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by birdboy View Post
OP, take a look at Void Linux, might be exactly what you're looking for.
Mmm. Installation and configuration look very Slacky. On the other hand it's a rolling release, so probably less stable. There doesn't seem to be a USP here.
 
Old 12-04-2018, 12:44 PM   #39
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,522

Rep: Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267Reputation: 3267
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
Hmm! I'm not sure I want to associate myself with a load of 2nd amendment freaks and hillbillies. I'm eccentric but not that sort of eccentric.
Not all Slackware users fall into that category. I tended to focus more on:

Quote:
Slackware that appeals to the self-supportive, independent people of this world
This, I think, does sum up Slackware users pretty well. We don't run Slackware because it's popular. We run it because it fits our needs and we don't need validation from others for our choices.

Slackware is a great distro, but I will be the first to admit, it certainly isn't for everyone.

As for one of your sentences in your first post:

Quote:
Debian never uses one package where five will do!
If this is a big complaint, then Slackware may not be the distro for you (which is totally fine!). Pat long ago decided that he didn't want to dictate what software people use. This is why he tends to ship many different packages for the same task. For editors you have vim, emacs, nano, pico, ed, joe, kate, kwrite, and possibly more I don't remember. For WMs/DEs there's kde, xfce, fluxbox, blackbox, windowmaker, fvvm2, and twm. For video players, there's xine, mplayer, and kplayer. For browsers there's firefox, seamonkey, and konqueror with a google-chrome SlackBuild in extra/. Even with bootloaders, there's lilo, elilo, grub, and syslinux.

Slackware tends to use the (almost) everything but the kitchen sink method, which works for a lot of users because it makes it more likely that their preferred choice is going to be available. But some users are going to be unhappy because it's either too much (bloat) or not enough (my preferred whatever isn't available).

If you prefer the "one app per task" style, there is Salix (which has probably been mentioned already, but I'm too lazy to go back and look), which is based on Slackware and is binary compatible with Slackware.
 
Old 12-04-2018, 12:51 PM   #40
dugan
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,551

Rep: Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569Reputation: 3569
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
Hmm! I'm not sure I want to associate myself with a load of 2nd amendment freaks and hillbillies. I'm eccentric but not that sort of eccentric.
How about Europeans then?

Last edited by dugan; 12-04-2018 at 02:56 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 12:58 PM   #41
1337_powerslacker
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 664
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
We don't run Slackware because it's popular. We run it because it fits our needs and we don't need validation from others for our choices.

Slackware is a great distro, but I will be the first to admit, it certainly isn't for everyone.
This sums up exactly why I use it. I have reached the point in my life where I don't give a rat's a** about who thinks what about what choices I make for myself. It really doesn't affect anyone else's life one way or another. Live and let live, I say!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 01:59 PM   #42
hazel
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2016
Location: Harrow, UK
Distribution: Debian, Crux, LFS, AntiX
Posts: 2,465

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182Reputation: 1182
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
If this is a big complaint, then Slackware may not be the distro for you (which is totally fine!). Pat long ago decided that he didn't want to dictate what software people use. This is why he tends to ship many different packages for the same task.
No, that's not what I meant. Maybe I expressed myself badly. Having a lot of alternatives is a good thing. Even Crux, which has a very limited officially supported repository, has a lot of private ones where you can get non-KISS software like gnome and KDE. What I meant about Debian (and it's a long-standing beef of mine) is the way they fragment packages. They often take out bits of upstream packages and package them separately, and I don't just mean the runtime/development library thing (which Red Hat distros do too and which does make a sort of sense). It makes for more complexity and more dependencies. Slackware seems more like LFS in this respect: a package contains what upstream says it ought to contain.

Last edited by hazel; 12-04-2018 at 02:19 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 03:03 PM   #43
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 14.2
Posts: 3,094

Rep: Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472Reputation: 1472
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
Hmm! I'm not sure I want to associate myself with a load of 2nd amendment freaks and hillbillies. I'm eccentric but not that sort of eccentric.
Can we please keep this in the technical arena and away from the political one?
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-04-2018, 04:30 PM   #44
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix, Devuan, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,084

Rep: Reputation: 852Reputation: 852Reputation: 852Reputation: 852Reputation: 852Reputation: 852Reputation: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by hazel View Post
Hmm! I'm not sure I want to associate myself with a load of 2nd amendment freaks and hillbillies. I'm eccentric but not that sort of eccentric.
Slack might not be for you after-all. Actually seems like *̶b̶u̶n̶t̶u̶̶/antiX thinking, I had high hopes for you hazel.
 
Old 12-04-2018, 05:07 PM   #45
upnort
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Distribution: Slackware, Proxmox, Debian, CentOS, Ubuntu MATE
Posts: 768

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
What I meant about Debian (and it's a long-standing beef of mine) is the way they fragment packages. They often take out bits of upstream packages and package them separately, and I don't just mean the runtime/development library thing (which Red Hat distros do too and which does make a sort of sense). It makes for more complexity and more dependencies.
Those who are comfortable wearing those well-worn Slackware jeans do tend to get miffed by this difference. Myself included. That said, the split package design somewhat makes sense from an end-user perspective. No need to install development support when most users just use the base app and do not do development work. Pretty much a tom-ay-to and to-mah-to difference, although annoying to some of us.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
any advice on how to persuade my school against Linux-proof browsers? newbiesforever Linux - General 27 02-23-2018 09:20 PM
LXer: DevOps: How to Persuade Your Boss to Buy In LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-19-2016 04:58 PM
[SOLVED] I can't persuade LinuxMint Olivia/Cinammon to relate to Logitech webcam C270 mlplatt Linux - Newbie 10 11-12-2013 12:17 PM
Dedicated Slackware users persuade me Synesthesia Slackware 32 08-20-2008 08:39 AM
Kpilot doesn't sync to KDE addressbook? How to persuade it? furryspider Linux - Software 0 12-10-2005 04:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration