LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-09-2010, 08:48 AM   #46
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225

I'll upgrade my gateway to 13.1 (32 bit) today. I run an ntpd service there for my local network. I'll let you know how it goes.
 
Old 07-09-2010, 09:43 PM   #47
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
This is working (so far) on my machine:

Code:
restrict default notrust nomodify noquery
restrict 172.16.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 nomodify
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
server pool.ntp.org iburst
server pool.ntp.org iburst
server pool.ntp.org iburst
server 127.127.1.0
restrict pool.ntp.org nomodify
restrict pool.ntp.org nomodify
restrict pool.ntp.org nomodify
restrict 127.0.0.1
driftfile /etc/ntp/ntp.drift
logfile /var/log/ntp.log
Adding more than 3 "server pool.ntp.org iburst" line won't do you any good.

My internal network uses the 172.16.0.0 address space instead of the 192.168.x.x one.
 
Old 07-10-2010, 11:49 AM   #48
tennis_slacker
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
For some reason ntpd seems to be working for everyone else besides me. Just my luck!

I reinstalled 13.1 ... same problem.

Unless someone has a suggestion and quick, I'm 5 seconds from typing 'reboot' and putting a different distribution on. I thought Slackware was going to be a rock and I've enjoyed using it, but I just don't know what to do to get ntpd working correctly. Even according to http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/NTPPoolServers a minimal ntp.conf is:

Code:
driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift
server 0.pool.ntp.org
server 1.pool.ntp.org
server 2.pool.ntp.org
server 3.pool.ntp.org
Which looks pretty close to what I have:

Code:
server  127.127.1.0     # local clock
fudge   127.127.1.0 stratum 10
server 0.us.pool.ntp.org
server 1.us.pool.ntp.org
server 2.us.pool.ntp.org
server 3.us.pool.ntp.org

driftfile /etc/ntp/drift
 
Old 07-10-2010, 03:51 PM   #49
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
When I tried using a sub pool as you have above, the servers given to me would never sync up. Their refid was always .INIT. .

Did you try my configuration file? It should work for you too.

However, my offset values appear to be increasing. I don't remember the earlier values, so I'll post the output of ntpq -p here so I can compare and post later.

Code:
     remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
+153.16.4.136    129.6.15.29      2 u  926 1024  377  154.652   42.061   3.950
*bindcat.fhsu.ed 132.163.4.102    2 u  278 1024  377   36.894  -14.729   1.457
+triangle.kansas 128.252.19.1     2 u  900 1024  363   24.186  -11.746   3.413
 LOCAL(0)        .LOCL.          10 l  18h   64    0    0.000    0.000   0.000
 
Old 07-10-2010, 05:21 PM   #50
tennis_slacker
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Sorry, I didn't try your ntp.conf. I did try various servers, but always with the same result of ntpd failing. The server setup I used is what is recommended at the ntp website using public pool servers. From the times I've posted my ntpq -p output I never had an issue with the 'refid'.

I had reached my frustration tipping point and just couldn't take it anymore. I've switched distributions, currently all is running well.

I definitely am curious if you have continued success with ntpd. Thanks!
 
Old 07-10-2010, 06:21 PM   #51
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
What version of ntpd is your new distribution using?

I'll wait a day or so before I re-post on this topic, unless my ntpd process dies (in which case I will post shortly after I find out about it). I don't think that it shall, but you never know.
 
Old 07-10-2010, 08:57 PM   #52
tennis_slacker
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
It's ntp 4.2.4p8. So far so good.
 
Old 07-11-2010, 12:13 PM   #53
tennis_slacker
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Well ... I knew in my gut that this was not a Slackware problem. I know Slackware is a rock, that's why I put it on my server and I'll be putting in back on today hopefully.

ntpd crashed on the new distribution.

I think this is a hwclock drift issue. The hwclock is currently 15 minutes in the future which is probably why ntpd crashed. I did recently replace the ethernet card, but I don't know why that would affect the hwclock.

Any ideas or should I post a new thread after I do some research, since this doesn't seem to be an ntp problem?
 
Old 07-11-2010, 03:07 PM   #54
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
Hmm. Dang nab it, I read a thread that may have some bearing on your problem...

OK, see if this has any bearing on your problem. (The link, as I understand it, claims that if your hardware clock drifts too much, then ntpd will eventually give up and exit.)

My gateway has been running ntpd since 9:36pm on 2010-07-09 with no issues.
 
Old 07-11-2010, 05:49 PM   #55
tennis_slacker
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
Wow ... that's a lot of information to try to learn. I don't think I found any real issues or solutions. I did find this:

Quote:
Can I use my system clock as reference clock?

In short: You can, but you should not. See also What is LCL, the Local Clock?.

Warning

Using the free-running system clock means that your NTP server announces that time as reference time to any client, no matter how wrong it is. Especially when connected to the Internet this can cause severe confusion.

A recent survey[2] discovered that about 95% of bad stratum-1 servers had configured LCL, the local clock, as time reference. So please don't make the same mistake after having read this!
Slackware has the LCL clock configured as a time server by default:

Code:
server 127.127.1.0     # local clock
fudge  127.127.1.0 stratum 10
But this doesn't seem to be causing any trouble in your configuration.

Just thinking out loud here ... maybe the hwclock drifted or the local clock drifted, then the local clock was used as a time server and ntpd couldn't adjust to the large difference and crashed. Maybe something like that???

I need to research the relationship between the hwclock and local clock.

Anyway, I'm back on Slackware now. I've commented out the local clock lines and we'll see how it goes. It's been running for 4 hours now. Crossing my fingers. Thanks!
 
Old 07-11-2010, 07:45 PM   #56
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
Yeah, but that would mean that there was something goofy with your motherboard's hardware clock. I think (but do not know for sure) that if you turn off your local clock that ntpd may simply barf off if you had to reboot after a sufficient period of time.

You could Google "USB hardware clocks" to see what comes up, but it might be cheaper to simply get a new motherboard.

*shakes head* Dude (*frowns* or whatever the female form of "Dude" would be), I wish that I could provide more specific help, but I think that the clock on your motherboard is failing.
 
Old 07-13-2010, 08:14 AM   #57
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
Not that it really matters, but ntpd has been working for around 3 days now with no problems.
 
Old 07-13-2010, 09:54 AM   #58
catkin
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Tamil Nadu, India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 8,578
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208Reputation: 1208
If the theory that the problem is caused by a "bad" hardware clock is correct -- and it sounds credible -- then a workaround might be to set the hardware clock from the system clock as often as is necessary, say every 15 minutes ... ?
 
Old 07-13-2010, 12:45 PM   #59
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,691

Rep: Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894
From what I have read ntp will update the hardware clock every 11 minutes. AFIK besides the 11 minute update mode the only other time the hardware clock is read or written is boot up and shut down. The hardware clock could be bad...


Could be a similar problem to this thread except that your does not seem to be off by a fixed 23 seconds...
http://fixunix.com/ntp/68135-system-...e-hwclock.html
 
Old 07-13-2010, 01:10 PM   #60
tennis_slacker
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: Idaho
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 92

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 17
After commenting out the Local server lines in ntp.conf, it has been running for 2 days now.

My "theory" is that "somehow" the hwclock messed up the local clock. The local clock was then acting as a server and conflicting with the other servers, ntp couldn't navigate the discrepancies between servers and gave up.

Though I realize I really have no clue ... and my theory may be completely wrong ... and ntp may crash in the next ten minutes.

Only time (ha ha) will tell. I'll wait a few days to see if it continues to run.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NTP time sync with windows 2000 AD time csghosh Linux - Enterprise 7 02-24-2012 03:46 PM
NTP sync time issue... smartyshan Linux - Server 5 06-23-2009 02:37 AM
NTP sync up time sidra Linux - Networking 1 09-27-2007 09:07 PM
Sync KDE/System Time w/ NTP carlosinfl Linux - General 6 03-15-2006 03:37 PM
ntp time sync eyewittness Linux - Networking 2 08-11-2004 09:18 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration