SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
[OT]
I am not even commenting on the Gnome and KDE figures. But XFCE, 290 MB for the lightweight desktop... Is it XFCE? CentOS?
The more it goes, the more I admire what Windows 95 could do on a PC with at least 4MB RAM.
There is some mystery here. What 286 MB bought us?
[/OT]
[OT] Ummm yeah it was DOS with a shell. If you admire that you would be in complete gob-smacked awe had you used OS/2 an actual 32 bit Multitasking,
PreEmptive bottom-to-top system by 1991. Maybe you remember actually trying to utilize anything more than 1MB RAM with Win95. Did you buy and use QEMM?
OS/2 directly mapped orders of magnitude more RAM with no such problematic Extended Memory shenanigans. By 1996 it was fully SMP capable, came with (built
in, at no additional cost) Internet capable networking including a built-in browser, Java, Lotus Notes, Voice command and recognition, and a complete Office
suite and still ran on 4MB RAM, partly because it was written almost entirely in Assembly. Incidentally by 1999 one could compile Unix apps and run an
Enlightenment Linux DE. It's a crime IBM didn't have Billy and the Boys' marketing savvy or, conversely, that MS didn't have IBM's high standards and
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.